Weekend Open Thread

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 21, 2009 at 8:43 am

I’m getting ready to go meet my sis and we’ll be headed to the movie theater to see if we can catch the New Moon movie this morning before the crowds pick up in the afternoon. Yes – I’m a Twilight fan. :">

I understand the Senate will have a “test vote” tonight on healthcare, a vote that will determine if Senators can begin debating the monstrous healthcare bill on the floor. Lord willing and I don’t faint from seeing Edward Cullen on the big screen, I should be around to blog about it. :D

Catch y’all later.

 

Global warming alarmists exposed?

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 20, 2009 at 2:00 pm

Blockbuster news (via MM):

If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at Hadley CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:

Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.

One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:

“In an odd way this is cheering news.”

But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.

Ed Morrissey’s posted some of the emails, in particular a few in which the contents look pretty damaging. Make sure to read his post in full.

A few things that go without saying: 1) Hacking into someone’s emails and private files is obviously wrong, and it should be prosecuted. 2) In spite of the title of this email, I’m well aware – as are those who read this blog – that global warming alarmists have been exposed as fearmongering chicken little liars (not to mention hypocrites) for decades, but rarely has it been on a level where you actually have “scientists” and their associates caught on paper attempting to suppress data that is contra to their pre-desired result. And the few times these “scientists” have been clearly exposed, the MSM – predictably – engages in a cover-up of their own.

But this scandal has the potential to eclipse past agw scandals, to the point where the MSM will have no choice but to report on it. That said, when – if – the reports start filtering in, expect the angle on the stories not to be about the damaging information in the emails – information that, to my layman’s eyes, appears to show “scientists” trying to hide data that would hinder their pro-alarmist agenda, but instead about how it was an “invasion of privacy” with quotes from “scientists” and those in related fields expressing “outrage” that the hard work of their colleagues has been “compromised.” The same MSM – and many of the same lefties – who yawned back when Sarah Palin’s personal email account was hacked into last year, will rise up in favor of stonger laws that would allow for tougher punishment for hackers.

As they say, this story is developing – so hold on to your hats.

 

Bad news for Democrats: Americans are shifting blame for economy from the GOP to Dems

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 20, 2009 at 11:23 am

If these numbers are to be believed, then all of Obama’s talk about how this economy is “Bush’s fault” is falling on deaf ears:

Washington (CNN) – Nearly two years into the recession, opinion about which political party is responsible for the severe economic downturn is shifting, according to a new national poll.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Friday morning indicates that 38 percent of the public blames Republicans for the country’s current economic problems. That’s down 15 points from May, when 53 percent blamed the GOP. According to the poll 27 percent now blame the Democrats for the recession, up 6 points from May. Twenty-seven percent now say both parties are responsible for the economic mess.

“The bad news for the Democrats is that the number of Americans who hold the GOP exclusively responsible for the recession has been steadily falling by about two to three points per month,” says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. “At that rate, only a handful of voters will blame the economy on the Republicans by the time next year’s midterm elections roll around.”

That’s music to my ears.

Related reading:

 

Pat Leahy: We wouldn’t need to “interrogate” OBL if we caught him

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 19, 2009 at 8:14 pm

Another Keystone cop strikes again:

If the U.S. captures Osama bin Laden, there’s no need to interrogate him, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Thursday.

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the chairman of that committee, said that arguments raised by Republican senators about whether bin Laden would be afforded Miranda rights if he were captured amount to a “red herring.”

“The red herring that my friend [Sen.] Lindsey Graham [R-S.C.] was covering is not realistic,” Leahy said during an appearance on “Washington Journal” on C-SPAN.

“For one thing, capturing Osama bin Laden — we’ve had enough on him, we don’t need to interrogate him,” Leahy added.

Graham had grilled Attorney General Eric Holder during a hearing on Capitol Hill on Wednesday on whether bin Laden should be afforded due process in courts if he were captured.

“The big problem I have is you’re criminalizing the war, that if we caught bin Laden tomorrow, we have mixed theories and couldn’t turn him over to the CIA, the FBI, military intelligence for an interrogation on the battlefield, because now you’re saying he’s subject to criminal court in the United States and you’re confusing the people fighting this war,” Graham said.

A senior Republican aide criticized Leahy, saying “it’s a good thing they kicked him off the intel committee in the late 80’s.”

I’ll say.

For all of Lindsey Graham’s faults – and there are many – major props for cornering Holder on this issue yesterday.

But back to Leahy, he’s defending Holder’s decison:

“We’re going to bring [KSM and other detainees] back to New York and prosecute them,” he said. “I think we ought to stand up and applaud that.”

No. “We” won’t be applauding this farce. They will.

 

Dolphins at the Panthers (UPDATE: PANTHERS LOSE 24-17)

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 19, 2009 at 7:49 pm

Panthers logoYahoo! A Thursday night, primetime game for the Cats here at home in lovely, slightly chilly Charlotte. Let’s hope they put on their best faces for the cameras :) Both teams are hoping to get to 5-5, and a good way to get there will be for the Panters to neutralize the “wildcat offense.” Will Delhomme and the gang continue to use the “no huddle” strategy, which worked out well for them this past Sunday?

Stay tuned.

Game time is at 8:20 ET and it will be broadcast on the NFL Network. For those of you like me who don’t have that channel, you can watch the game online here.

Update – 8:11 PM: Thanks to a tip from ST reader Anthony, I found out that NFL network games are shown in local markets. Charlotte area Panthers fans can watch the game on cable channel 10.

Update 2: Thank goodness it’s over. The Panthers lose in primetime 24-17.

 

Goracle: Interior of the earth is hotter than the sun

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 19, 2009 at 1:45 pm

Comedy gold, ladies and gents. Comedy gold. ;))

 

MSDNC grills 13 y/o Palin supporter on bailouts; Media Matters cheers

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 19, 2009 at 12:44 pm

Need any more proof of MSDNC’s slavish devotion to the Democrat party?

I wonder if they would have done the same grilling on any of the young kids who have been coached at schools all across the country to sing Obama’s praises? “You do know President Obama doesn’t support gay marriage, right?”

Yeah – I know. That’s expecting way too much from these classless acts at the KeithO network. :-w

 

Andrew Sullivan’s blog NOT “going silent” as promised

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 19, 2009 at 10:12 am

Damn. I should have known that this was too good to be true.

Jules Crittenden sums up:

With its feverishness, weird syntax and promise to be “up half the night” obsessing, this is a masterful depiction of a mental breakdown in progress.

I am really starting to develop a deep appreciation for what Andrew Sullivan does. That guy needs a special Blog Award category to accommodate the hefty blogging girth he’s been swinging around this year. “Most Bat-Sh*t.” ”Best Crazytown Blog.” “Lifetime Wack-Achievement Award.” Something like that. “Best Unhinged Fantastist Palin Conspiracy Theorist Blog” is more focused and probably worth considering, though people might think that was rigged a little too far in Sullivan’s favor.

Well, in Sully’s defense, he does seem to be doing a darned fine job of emulating his hero. He’s sure as heck got the flip-flopping down pat.

Sigh … and the beat goes on.

 

Holder: If KSM somehow is not convicted, he will still not be released – may be sent to Bagram

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 18, 2009 at 10:49 pm

So much for trying to demonstrate to the world the “fairness” of our justice system:

Facing a wave of critics warning of the risks of putting Mr. Mohammed on trial, Mr. Holder bluntly asserted that “failure isn’t a option” when asked during a Congressional hearing whether Mr. Mohammed and other key terrorist suspects will be convicted. Acquittals, claims of asylum and even judicial orders freeing them won’t result in releases, he asserted.

“If there is not a successful conclusion to this trial, that would not mean that this person would be released,” Mr. Holder bluntly told the Congressional hearing, referring to Mr. Mohammed – the self-proclaimed planner of the Sept 11, 2001, suicide hijackings.

“What if a federal judge orders the Department of Justice to release Khalid Sheikh Mohammed?” Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn asked. “Will you defy that order?”

Mr. Holder made it clear that by moving Mr. Mohammed to a prison offshore – such as Bagram in Afghanistan, where hundreds of detainees are held – a release order could be circumvented.

“We have taken the view that the judiciary does not have the ability necessarily to certainly require us to, with people who are held overseas, to release them,” he said. “It’s hard for me to imagine a set of circumstances, given the other things that we could do with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed” that would result in him being freed,” the Attorney-General said.

“Under the regime we are contemplating … the ability to detain under laws of war, we would retain that ability,” Mr. Holder added, meaning anyone freed by the courts could simply be returned as an enemy combatant to indefinite military detention.

Mr. Obama, a former law professor, denied he was interfering with Mr. Mohammed’s right to a fair trial. “I’m not prejudging it,” he said in a televised NBC interview. “I’m not going to be in that courtroom. That’s the job of the prosecutors, the judge and the jury,” he said.

Like I said this morning, this so-called “trial for justice for the 9-11 victims” is a pretense for this administration. If their whole point in this trial is to demonstrate to the world that we have a “fair and just” system, then proclaiming KSM guilty and deciding his punishment before he’s had a trial – and suggesting that even if he isn’t found guilty that he will still be held and possibly sent to Bagram is certainly unlike any “fair and just” system I’ve ever heard of. Essentially, Holder is saying, “If we don’t like the verdict, we still have options for keeping him in custody.” Huh??

All the options he put on the table in the event of a not guilty verdict for KSM are options he should have taken advantage of instead of going the route he’s chosen to with this farcical show trial.

Really. Wake me up when amateur hour is over in this WH!

 

VIDEO: *Senator* Obama expresses support for KSM military tribunal

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 18, 2009 at 7:43 pm

Via Andrew Malcolm:

Speaking of military tribunals, we went back into the video archives and found this C-SPAN tape below. Holder might want to watch it.

It contains his boss, Barack Obama, a brief member of that same Senate, in 2006 stating that a military tribunal was a perfectly fine way of handling such dangerous individuals as Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.

Obama said the fight against terrorism was “an extraordinarily difficult war” where terrorists could plot undetected from within our own borders.

The freshman Illinois senator was defending a legislative amendment and pointed out that a military tribunal for Mohammed seemed just fine to him.

“The irony of the underlying bill as it’s written is that someone like Khalid Shaikh Mohammed is going to get basically a full military trial with all the bells and whistles. He’s gonna have counsel. He’s gonna be able to present evidence to rebut the government’s case…. I think we will convict him. And I think justice will be carried out.”

Here’s the video:

Apparently, now that he has more “experience,” he believes otherwise. 8-|