Sister Toldjah!
12/29/2003 - 6:03 pm

Let us hope there are many, many more like P. Amy MacKinnon:

When I was growing up, the family dinner was a tradition. Above the clatter of plates, my parents discussed the world around us from their perspectives at either end of the great oak table. Together, we’d review the news of the day put into context by the events of yesterday, and always we’d think about tomorrow. Politics was a main course, and being a working-class family from Massachusetts, we were fed a healthy serving of Democratic Party principles.

I carried those beliefs along with me when I worked for Democrats in both the US House of Representatives and the Massachusetts state legislature. More important, I’ve always carried them with me into the voting booth.

But I expect to break with that tradition. Come November, I’ll be casting my vote for George Bush. *snip*

I can’t rely on the contenders from my own party to follow Bush’s course. Only three of the nine running in Democratic primaries are viable candidates, and none is willing to risk political comfort to pledge a presidency to the messy business of routing terrorists and their sponsor nations. Howard Dean, Wesley Clark, and John Kerry are now all against the war in Iraq, though both General Clark and Senator Kerry supported it once, and may again. *snip*

Bravo!

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Politics
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |   

12/28/2003 - 6:45 pm

I do indeed believe that the media love affair with Howard Dean is over:

Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean has demanded release of secret deliberations of Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force. But as Vermont governor, Dean had an energy task force that met in secret and angered state lawmakers.

Dean’s group held one public hearing and after-the-fact volunteered the names of industry executives and liberal advocates it consulted in private, but the Vermont governor refused to open the task force’s closed-door deliberations.

In 1999, Dean offered the same argument the Bush administration uses today for keeping deliberations of a policy task force secret.

“The governor needs to receive advice from time to time in closed session. As every person in government knows, sometimes you get more open discussion when it’s not public,” Dean was quoted as saying.

Dean’s own dispute over the secrecy of a Vermont task force that devised a policy for restructuring the state’s near-bankrupt electric utilities has escaped national attention, even though he has attacked a similar arrangement used by President Bush.*snip*

Hhhhhhypocrite!

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Politics
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |   

12/18/2003 - 7:18 pm

I am hoping he doesn’t. The last thing we need is, after a W win, for someone to say he wouldn’t have won if it weren’t for Ralph Nader:

Ralph Nader, whose campaign for president in 2000 arguably tilted several close states — and victory — to George W. Bush, is considering another run.

In 2000, Nader ran as the Green Party nominee, winning about 3 percent of the popular vote, including 97,000 votes in Florida. Democrat Al Gore lost the election when Bush defeated him in Florida by 537 votes and the U.S. Supreme Court halted a recount. Nader, who thrives on controversy, bristles at the “spoiler” label, saying it is “offensive and a violation of my civil liberties” to tell him not to run.

And there are increasing signs he will run again, from the creation of an exploratory committee this month to constant meetings with Green Party members and longtime supporters nationwide.

“I’ll decide next month,” Nader said Wednesday, pushing back his earlier promise to decide by year-end.*snip*

Just keep the pies away from him til he decides.

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Goracle, Politics
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |   

12/18/2003 - 7:12 pm

… and the closer it gets to election time, the wackier they’re going to get. The Washington Times breaks it down for us:

Conspiracy theories continued to sprout among Democrats yesterday in the wake of the capture of Saddam Hussein. Some Democrats expressed alarm that the party was drifting out of the “mainstream.”

Madeleine Albright, the secretary of state in the Clinton administration, in a conversation with Morton Kondracke, executive editor of Roll Call and a Fox News Channel political analyst, suggested that Osama bin Laden has been captured by U.S. forces and will soon be produced to the public. “Do you suppose,” she asked, “that the Bush administration has Osama bin Laden hidden away somewhere and will bring him out before the election?”

Mrs. Albright said last night she was kidding. “She was not smiling when she said this,” Mr. Kondracke said. The disclosure of Mrs. Albright’s remark followed by a day the charge by Rep. Jim McDermott of Washington that the Bush administration could have captured Saddam “long ago if they wanted,” but held off until Mr. Bush could use it as a boost in his approval ratings.

“There’s too much by happenstance for it to be just a coincidental thing,” he said.

Earlier, Howard Dean, the former governor of Vermont, the presumed leader of the Democratic presidential candidates, spoke of “a theory,” which he later said he didn’t believe, that President Bush had prior knowledge of the September 11 attacks and did not take steps to prevent them. *snip*

Other Democrats have questioned the Bush administration’s motives in going to war in Iraq. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts said in September that the war was “made up in Texas.” The Bush administration “announced it in January to the Republican leadership that the war was going to take place and was going to be good politically,” Mr. Kennedy said. “The whole thing was a fraud.”

Rep. Robert T. Matsui, California Democrat and member of the House Armed Services Committee, said the war was waged “to an extent to take attention from the economy.” *snip*

Wonder if these people who made these statements believe in black helicopters, too?

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Politics
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |   

12/18/2003 - 7:04 pm

Real smooth, Terry. Real smooth:

Several city officials are furious over the Democratic National Committee chairman’s recent visit to Portsmouth High School, who they feel turned a social studies lesson into a one-sided bashing of President Bush.

After requesting to visit the school, Terry McAuliffe was allowed by Principal Forrest Ransdell to come to teach what the principal believed to be social studies classes on democracy and the political process. However, several city officials are livid over what they say turned into a biased Democratic view of Republican President Bush’s term of office.

During the presentation, McAuliffe told students that due to Bush’s mismanagement of the country, 70 percent of college graduates will not be able to find a job upon graduation. He also told students that if the war in Iraq continues as it has, there could be a reinstatement of the draft.

“He comes into the school and just says what he wants,” City Councilor Bill St. Laurent said. “At what point does he stop his politicking to the point of scare tactics? Saying that the draft may come back, and kids cant find jobs, those are scare tactics. He is out trying to get votes. This is taxpayers money, excuse me, but this is my tax dollar and I don’t want to use my tax dollar for his pulpit.”

St. Laurent said there should be a measure of checks and balances in such presentations, limiting speakers to a nonpartisan discussion.*snip*

Like, DUH! :-)

When are the Dems going to get rid of this clown?

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Politics
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |   

12/18/2003 - 6:58 pm

As usual, their ruling does not make any sense:

A federal appeals court ruled Thursday for the first time that prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base (search) in Cuba should have access to lawyers and the American court system.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ (search) 2-1 decision was a rebuke to the Bush Administration.

The administration maintains that because the 660 men held there were picked up overseas on suspicion of terrorism and are being held on foreign land, they may be detained indefinitely without charges or trial.

The Supreme Court last month acide whether the detainees, picked up in Afghanistan and Pakistan, should have access to the courts. The justices agreed to hear that case after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the prisoners had no rights to the American legal system.

The San Francisco appeals court, ruling Thursday on a petition from a relative of a Libyan the U.S. military captured in Afghanistan, said the Bush administration’s indefinite detention of the men runs contrary to American ideals.

“Even in times of national emergency — indeed, particularly in such times — it is the obligation of the Judicial Branch to ensure the preservation of our constitutional values and to prevent the Executive Branch from running roughshod over the rights of citizens and aliens alike,” Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote for the majority.*snip*

Hoookay. How do these guys get the same rights we do when they are not even Americans? I predict this will be overturned - IIRC, about 65% of the 9th Circus’ rulings are overturned. Any guesses as to why?

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Law/Judiciary, Politics
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |   

12/18/2003 - 6:38 pm

Wow - where do I start? Howard Dean is facing a major backlash within his own party. It would seem that even though he’s gotten the endorsement of “Mr. Establishment” himself, Al Gore, he’s still considered an outsider with the Dem candidates, and a few other lefty notables who you’ll read about in a bit. The inconsistencies in Dean’s statements are just now starting to get some play in the media. Notice how it seems that everytime Wes Clark or John Kerry flub up in their statements, it’s national news for days and weeks and the media really takes them to task? Dean has been Mr. Teflon in this area - but it seems times are a changin’. Let’s take a look at a piece from today’s WashPost:

Howard Dean’s penchant for flippant and sometimes false statements is generating increased criticism from his Democratic presidential rivals and raising new questions about his ability to emerge as a nominee who can withstand intense, sustained scrutiny and defeat President Bush.

Dean, for instance, recently spoke of a “most interesting theory” that Saudi Arabia had “warned” Bush about the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Although Dean said he does not believe Bush was tipped off about the assaults that killed nearly 3,000, he has made no apologies for raising the rumor.

“How is what I did different from what Dick Cheney or George Bush . . . did during the time of the buildup of the invasion of Iraq?” the former Vermont governor said Tuesday night aboard his campaign plane. “There were all these theories that they mentioned. Many of them turned out not to be true. The difference is that I acknowledged that I did not believe the theory I was putting out.”

Bush this week called the theory an “absurd insinuation.”

Dean’s remarks, his critics say, are in keeping with his history of making statements that are mean-spirited or misleading. He has distorted his past support for raising the retirement age for Social Security and slowing Medicare’s growth. He has falsely said he was the only Democratic presidential candidate talking about race before white audiences. And he made allegations — some during his years as governor — that turned out to be untrue.

After saying at his last gubernatorial news conference that he was sealing his official records to avoid political embarrassment, Dean now says he was joking and is not sure what is in the files.*snip*

MSNBC’s Political Affair’s Writer did this hit piece on Dean as well:

Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean has taken contrasting and sometimes conflicting stances on issues ranging from the war in Iraq to campaign finance to disposal of nuclear waste at the Yucca Mountain site in Nevada.

While some of his Democratic rivals have fired intermittent criticism at Dean for shifting his stands, none of them has yet wrapped all the issues into a comprehensive attack that questions Dean’s credibility.

In an interview last week about his foreign policy ideas, Dean said “it’s all about nuance” and indeed some of Dean’s shifts have been a matter of nuance.

But others, such as his switch on whether he’d abide by campaign spending limits, have been outright reversals of his previous commitments.*snip*

Not only is the media starting to question Howard Dean’s credibility (thank goodness!) but self-professed Bush hater Jonathan Chait doesn’t seem to be too high on Dean. He now calls himself a Deanophobe and has the blog to prove it:

It’s not entirely clear to me why I’ve taken such an intense dislike to Howard Dean. Yes, I find him arrogant and frequently dishonest. Yes, I’m certain his nomination would lead to a political disaster of historic, and possibly biblical, proportions. And, yes, I’m continuously dumbfounded that a number of highly intelligent people I know have convinced themselves that his nomination is a good thing, or at least that it’s not an unambiguously bad thing. But somehow the whole of my loathing for Dean is greater than the sum of its parts. So I’ve decided to start a blog on TNR’s website to indulge that loathing.*snip*

To all my conservative pals out there: do your best to keep these inconsistencies out there in the public eye. With any luck, his fellow Dems running against him and other Dems like John Chait will weaken his credibility to the point that once he wins the nomination, he’ll be too busy defending himself from his flip flops to handle anything else.

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Politics
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |   

12/15/2003 - 10:50 pm

Hmmmmm … a potentially interesting development:

France said Monday it will work with other nations to cancel billions of dollars in Iraqi debt and that Saddam Hussein’s capture will open the way toward mending relations with Washington.

Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin of France, one of the most persuasive and persistent critics of the U.S. decision to wage war in Iraq, said he hopes the capture will allow the international community to “regain its unity.”

France’s commitment toward reducing the outstanding debt came a day before U.S. special envoy James A. Baker was to arrive in Paris, one of five European capitals he will visit this week as part of an effort to encourage such moves. *snip*ink maybe France is tired of being on the wrong side of this war? Too bad Howard Dean isn’t. Oh wait, it’s good he held on to his anti-war position even after the capture of Saddam Hussein. He is walking, talking, breathing evidence of who we DON’T need in the WH next year.

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: International, War on Terror
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |   

12/15/2003 - 10:44 pm

Saw this headline at the Wall Street Journal Opinion Page:

Saddam used fear to rule Iraq

WOW! Really, now?

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Media Watch
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |   

12/15/2003 - 10:38 pm

I hate to keep harping on this but I’m going to anyway. The three examples posted below (courtesy of MediaResearch.orgerfect examples of liberal media bias in its most potent form. Honestly, I didn’t think there was a way ANYone could have spun this capture negatively. Guess I just underestimated the media (shame on me!). Won’t make that mistake again.

I’m making it part of my life’s work to alert the public to media bias … not in a way that Media Research would do it (they are awesome!) but in my own way, with my own .02 added to it. It’s there. It’s real. It’s overt. Thankfully, FoxNews and talk radio have interupted the liberal domination of the media. But we still have a LONG way to go.

Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Media Watch
Comments Off | Email This Post | Print This |