<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too much time on their hands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2004/10/06/too-much-time-on-their-hands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2004/10/06/too-much-time-on-their-hands/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2004/10/06/too-much-time-on-their-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 02:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=375#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Kathy, I&#039;m not sure where you&#039;re getting the idea that &quot;nobody&quot; is discussing the holes in our current voting system (I&#039;ve linked up to some here).

Again, you imply that what is going in FL is some type of GOP conspiracy.  There are relaxations of voter registration rules/investigations of voter registration fraud in various states across the country where Democrats are involved.  Should I conclude it&#039;s nothing but a DNC conspiracy? 

As far as Internet polling, I don&#039;t trust it and never will again.  Every single one should be taken with a grain of salt.  Why any party would want to spam an online poll is beyond me.  It&#039;s meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathy, I&#8217;m not sure where you&#8217;re getting the idea that &#8220;nobody&#8221; is discussing the holes in our current voting system (I&#8217;ve linked up to some here).</p>
<p>Again, you imply that what is going in FL is some type of GOP conspiracy.  There are relaxations of voter registration rules/investigations of voter registration fraud in various states across the country where Democrats are involved.  Should I conclude it&#8217;s nothing but a DNC conspiracy? </p>
<p>As far as Internet polling, I don&#8217;t trust it and never will again.  Every single one should be taken with a grain of salt.  Why any party would want to spam an online poll is beyond me.  It&#8217;s meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2004/10/06/too-much-time-on-their-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=375#comment-148</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t trust on-line polls how can you put your faith in the new touch screen machines in Florida and elsewhere?  If you are so concerned about fairness in polling why isn&#039;t anybody discussing the holes you can drive a truck through in our current voting system.  Is that because the GOP has been able to manipulate those loopholed to a real advantage rather than just the perceived one that the Dem&#039;s were able to accomplish this week with a little spin control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t trust on-line polls how can you put your faith in the new touch screen machines in Florida and elsewhere?  If you are so concerned about fairness in polling why isn&#8217;t anybody discussing the holes you can drive a truck through in our current voting system.  Is that because the GOP has been able to manipulate those loopholed to a real advantage rather than just the perceived one that the Dem&#8217;s were able to accomplish this week with a little spin control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2004/10/06/too-much-time-on-their-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=375#comment-141</guid>
		<description>You wanna trust Internet polling, Kathy? Be my guest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wanna trust Internet polling, Kathy? Be my guest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2004/10/06/too-much-time-on-their-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=375#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Just to set the record straight... the MSNBC poll only allowed one vote per computer and Edwards still came out WAY ahead.  Sounds like a lot of sour grapes from the GOP since Karl Rove appears to have lost his control on the post debate spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to set the record straight&#8230; the MSNBC poll only allowed one vote per computer and Edwards still came out WAY ahead.  Sounds like a lot of sour grapes from the GOP since Karl Rove appears to have lost his control on the post debate spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2004/10/06/too-much-time-on-their-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 02:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=375#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Indeed, Cool ... not that those online polls were very trustworthy before, to be sure ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Cool &#8230; not that those online polls were very trustworthy before, to be sure <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_wink.gif' alt='&#59;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#59;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool Tester</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2004/10/06/too-much-time-on-their-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=375#comment-130</guid>
		<description>PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER

Edwards = 99%
Cheney = 1%

It&#039;s like an Iraqi election under Saddam Hussein.  It&#039;s interesting that the Democrats think that spamming online poll sites will actually do any good.  If anything, it will dishearten them when Bush wins the election (which he will most likely do).  All the Dems have managed to do is reduce public trust in online polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER</p>
<p>Edwards = 99%<br />
Cheney = 1%</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like an Iraqi election under Saddam Hussein.  It&#8217;s interesting that the Democrats think that spamming online poll sites will actually do any good.  If anything, it will dishearten them when Bush wins the election (which he will most likely do).  All the Dems have managed to do is reduce public trust in online polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2004/10/06/too-much-time-on-their-hands/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=375#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Here are my official blog poll numbers, based on one vote.  Can&#039;t be any less reliable than anyone else&#039;s results, right? :wink:

Who won last nights VP debate?
Cheney:  100%
Edwards:  0%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are my official blog poll numbers, based on one vote.  Can&#8217;t be any less reliable than anyone else&#8217;s results, right? <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Who won last nights VP debate?<br />
Cheney:  100%<br />
Edwards:  0%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
