<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN trumpets Iraq Body Count numbers-UPDATE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/07/26/cnn-trumpets-iraq-body-count-numbers-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/07/26/cnn-trumpets-iraq-body-count-numbers-update/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:15:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/07/26/cnn-trumpets-iraq-body-count-numbers-update/comment-page-1/#comment-14238</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=732#comment-14238</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never noticed that, Craig, but I&#039;ll be on the look out for it since you mentioned it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never noticed that, Craig, but I&#8217;ll be on the look out for it since you mentioned it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Lueschow</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/07/26/cnn-trumpets-iraq-body-count-numbers-update/comment-page-1/#comment-14236</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lueschow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=732#comment-14236</guid>
		<description>One fact that people seemed to miss is that the &#039;best&#039; this hard left organization could come up with is 25,000. as opposed to the oft-quoted 100,000. What is interesting, to me at least, is that the lefts choice of which count to use (25,000 or 100,000) is based soley on the potential audiance. When a consistiantly left-leaning audience is expected. The 100,000 count is used. When the audiance is expected to have mixed political leanings or a chance to show up on some conservatives radar (bloggers, for instancce) the less indictive 25,000 is used. Look at the news reports which contains casaulty realted info on the gulf war, and cross-referance with the intended audience. You will see a pattern.
CHOW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One fact that people seemed to miss is that the &#8216;best&#8217; this hard left organization could come up with is 25,000. as opposed to the oft-quoted 100,000. What is interesting, to me at least, is that the lefts choice of which count to use (25,000 or 100,000) is based soley on the potential audiance. When a consistiantly left-leaning audience is expected. The 100,000 count is used. When the audiance is expected to have mixed political leanings or a chance to show up on some conservatives radar (bloggers, for instancce) the less indictive 25,000 is used. Look at the news reports which contains casaulty realted info on the gulf war, and cross-referance with the intended audience. You will see a pattern.<br />
CHOW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
