Comments on: He predicted it would happen

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:54:57 +0000

It wasn’t meant to be.

By: actus

actus — Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:04:16 +0000

“So? If not that, they’d have found something else.”

The idea that he says other objectionable things isn’t really a saving grace.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:27:53 +0000

So? If not that, they’d have found something else.

By: actus

actus — Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:19:16 +0000

“I sincerely doubt that. ”

Seeing as how his problem is that he called islam a terrorist organization . . . .

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:19:10 +0000

I sincerely doubt that.

By: actus

actus — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:05:58 +0000

” We’ll keep targeting our anger and frustration on where it needs to be (radical Islam)”

Michael Graham would have been much better off if he stuck to talking about radical islam instead of islam in general.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:08:38 +0000

Sure it is, actus. Again, you guys keep strange bed fellows these days. That’s ok, though. We’ll keep targeting our anger and frustration on where it needs to be (radical Islam) while you guys focus on doing things like comparing our soldiers actions to the gulag, etc.

It’s a shame you guys can’t direct your anger at the right targets but then again, it’s not surprising, seeing as you can’t seem to channel that anger into election victories, either.

By: actus

actus — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:03:23 +0000

“Why don’t you tell us if it’s about him being’hateful’ Actus? Is that what it’s about to you guys?”

I thikn its about the idiocy that he said, which is hateful. I’m sure he’ll be welcome on the internet though.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:53:47 +0000

Why don’t you tell us if it’s about him being’hateful’ Actus? Is that what it’s about to you guys? The left sure is taking stranger and stranger bed partners these days (CAIR). You completely missed my point, but I’m starting to get used to it.

By: actus

actus — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:15:52 +0000

“But then again to the people out there who support CAIR’s push for MG to be pulled off the air, it’s not really about what he said so much as it is wanting to get a â€˜hateful right winger’ off the air, right?”

If its about him being hateful then its about what he says. Maybe they’ll make a classical station, DC needs more of those.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 01:53:08 +0000

You’re dang right the rightwing ‘mobosphere’ (cute – as if there’s not one on the left) will be giving Michael Graham a lot more attn. Attn. he deserves. But it’s not because of being silenced by the “MSM” it’s because he’s been targeted by an organization who puts up a front about its desires for a ‘harmonious’ relationship between Muslims and people of other faiths but who won’t tell you that they are backed by the same people who support Palestinian suicide bombers. The stench of hypocrisy is almost overwhelming. I think they (CAIR) need to worry about their own backyard instead of monitoring a talk radio host’s every word. After all, he’s not the one out there killing people in the name of Allah. That’s what you should be concerned about, actus. But then again to the people out there who support CAIR’s push for MG to be pulled off the air, it’s not really about what he said so much as it is wanting to get a ‘hateful right winger’ off the air, right?

By: actus

actus — Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:43:33 +0000

Correction: dude has a blog and a domain name:

http://www.michaelgraham.com/

Expect lashawnbarber, michelle malkin, and the general right-wing mobosphere to link to his very nice website. And expect all this attention to point out how he is somehow being silenced by the MSM that is talk AM radio.

By: actus

actus — Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:48:26 +0000

” So because you think the comments are stupid you don’t think the man should have been given a chance to defend himself? Interesting.”

He has a chance to defend himself. Tell him to start a blog.

By: mark

mark — Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:59:43 +0000

Here’s a link to an MP3 of his Friday morning show on WMAL, with a guest host –

mms://abcrad.wmod.llnwd.net/a49/external/0102cABAAHQAAAAcDle6yKhvE1c0LnEJnNwFajD8QD92LOnSD/
wmal/aud_archive/MG050729.mp3

http://wmal.com/listingsEntry.asp?ID=323805&PT=630%20WMAL%20On%20Demand

Mark, thanks for the link – for anyone interested in the first link, please copy the first line into your browser, then copy and paste what is right below it beside what you just copied in your browser and hit ‘enter.’ I had to make the link into two lines as it was causing the blog to scroll. –ST

By: actus

actus — Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:51:58 +0000

“It’s a shame that instead of letting him stick around to defend his comments, the station he worked for saw fit to handle this issue in the manner they did.”

What kind of defense besides the moronic do you expect?