Comments on: The award for most likely to suppress voters in 2004 goes to? http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/ Don't dis or dismiss this miss! Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: pst314 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15824 pst314 Sat, 06 Aug 2005 17:31:37 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15824 Back when liberals were pushing "motor voter" and other measures, any critics who pointed out that these measures would vote fraud much easier were called racists and oppressors. Back when liberals were pushing “motor voter” and other measures, any critics who pointed out that these measures would vote fraud much easier were called racists and oppressors.

]]> By: Sister Toldjah http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15668 Sister Toldjah Fri, 05 Aug 2005 18:25:56 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15668 NY, there were some questions as to how accurate this report is considering many in the group who compiled the info were members of the GOP. That said, I do think there were far more incidents of Dem's attempting to intimidate/suppress voters than Repubs. Bill Hobbs (who I linked to in my post) has an excellent roundup of links about this. NY, there were some questions as to how accurate this report is considering many in the group who compiled the info were members of the GOP.

That said, I do think there were far more incidents of Dem’s attempting to intimidate/suppress voters than Repubs. Bill Hobbs (who I linked to in my post) has an excellent roundup of links about this.

]]> By: NYgirl http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15658 NYgirl Fri, 05 Aug 2005 18:00:14 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15658 How awful. This is of course on top of all the cars with Bush & pro-life bumper stickers getting keyed. & Lawn signs being ripped out & graffitied. How awful. This is of course on top of all the cars with Bush & pro-life bumper stickers getting keyed. & Lawn signs being ripped out & graffitied.

]]> By: Sister Toldjah http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15376 Sister Toldjah Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:21:48 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15376 <strong>Actus:</strong> Indeed, they do :) <strong>Cliff:</strong> Yeah, it's interesting how the Dems are spinning this into a victory. I guess now a loss is not really a loss nor is a win a win? Those definitions just keep a' changin' ;) Actus: Indeed, they do :)

Cliff: Yeah, it’s interesting how the Dems are spinning this into a victory. I guess now a loss is not really a loss nor is a win a win? Those definitions just keep a’ changin’ ;)

]]> By: Cliff Hughes http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15371 Cliff Hughes Wed, 03 Aug 2005 17:03:49 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15371 Isn't it just a little ironic that a democrat posing as a hawk cannot fool all of the people any of the time and still calls it a victory. Where is the truth hiding in the democrat lexicon. Isn’t it just a little ironic that a democrat posing as a hawk cannot fool all of the people any of the time and still calls it a victory. Where is the truth hiding in the democrat lexicon.

]]> By: actus http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15369 actus Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:03:06 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15369 "Guess ya gotta grab those ‘wins' where you can these days, actus " Bellwethers toll whether you ignore them or not. “Guess ya gotta grab those ‘wins’ where you can these days, actus ”

Bellwethers toll whether you ignore them or not.

]]> By: Sister Toldjah http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15367 Sister Toldjah Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:37:05 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15367 Guess ya gotta grab those 'wins' where you can these days, actus :wink: Guess ya gotta grab those ‘wins’ where you can these days, actus :wink:

]]> By: actus http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15366 actus Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:35:01 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15366 "Is the "reality-based" version of events that election losses are labeled as victories?" Do you really have a hard time understanding how a 46% gain is a win, even if it didn't lead to grabbing a seat in a special election? “Is the “reality-based” version of events that election losses are labeled as victories?”

Do you really have a hard time understanding how a 46% gain is a win, even if it didn’t lead to grabbing a seat in a special election?

]]> By: Joe http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15365 Joe Wed, 03 Aug 2005 12:07:17 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15365 "A 4% loss is a major victory for democrats." Is the "reality-based" version of events that election losses are labeled as victories? “A 4% loss is a major victory for democrats.”

Is the “reality-based” version of events that election losses are labeled as victories?

]]> By: actus http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15363 actus Wed, 03 Aug 2005 11:37:47 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15363 "Expect shrill cries from the left of "stolen!" and other additional nonsense. " I doubt it. This disctrict was one which the GOP wins with 50% margins. A 4% loss is a major victory for democrats. “Expect shrill cries from the left of “stolen!” and other additional nonsense. ”

I doubt it. This disctrict was one which the GOP wins with 50% margins. A 4% loss is a major victory for democrats.

]]> By: Wizbang http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15362 Wizbang Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:30:36 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15362 <strong>So Much for the "Stolen Elections" Theory</strong> I wrote several times before the November election that Democrats were doing all they could to steal the election while complaining about Republican "voter intimidation" to cover their tracks. We all remember the slashed tires on Republican vans and ... So Much for the “Stolen Elections” Theory

I wrote several times before the November election that Democrats were doing all they could to steal the election while complaining about Republican “voter intimidation” to cover their tracks. We all remember the slashed tires on Republican vans and …

]]> By: Iowa Voice http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/comment-page-1/#comment-15361 Iowa Voice Wed, 03 Aug 2005 05:21:34 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/03/and-the-award-for-most-likely-to-suppress-voters-in-2004-goes-to/#comment-15361 <strong>John Hawkins And I Were Right</strong> John Hawkins had a prediction regarding the Ohio Special Election: That Paul Hackett would lose. I said that I agreed. We were correct. Here's the results: 753 precincts of 753 reporting JEAN SCHMIDT 57,974 52% PAUL HACKETT 54,401 48%However ... John Hawkins And I Were Right

John Hawkins had a prediction regarding the Ohio Special Election: That Paul Hackett would lose. I said that I agreed. We were correct. Here’s the results:

753 precincts of 753 reporting
JEAN SCHMIDT 57,974 52%
PAUL HACKETT 54,401 48%However …

]]>