<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOW: losing its potency?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:30:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/comment-page-1/#comment-16201</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 21:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/#comment-16201</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stephanie:&lt;/strong&gt; thanks for visiting.  I would like to think that the dwindling support for NOW and NARAL is not due to there not being any issues to fight, but due to the possibilty that less people support abortion now than used to, but that&#039;s just me :grin:

&lt;strong&gt;Dell:&lt;/strong&gt; Howdy! Good to see you here, Dell. This is actually a custom design from Lisa at Elegant Webscapes.  In fact, all three of my skins are.  I&#039;d keep them, but each of them have certain problems being viewed in certain browsers and/or screen resolutions, so I&#039;m having a new one designed.  If you&#039;re on the greenish looking &quot;Geek Girl&quot; blog skin, that&#039;s the one that works well with most browsers and screen resolutions, but my favorite of the three I have now is the one called &quot;Sister Toldjah&quot; and of course that seems to be the one that other browers/resolutions have the most problems with LOL.  I view my pages through IE 5, screen resolution 1024x768.

BTW, for any of you who haven&#039;t visited Dell&#039;s blog - please check it out! He&#039;s one well spoken gent. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stephanie:</strong> thanks for visiting.  I would like to think that the dwindling support for NOW and NARAL is not due to there not being any issues to fight, but due to the possibilty that less people support abortion now than used to, but that&#8217;s just me <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Dell:</strong> Howdy! Good to see you here, Dell. This is actually a custom design from Lisa at Elegant Webscapes.  In fact, all three of my skins are.  I&#8217;d keep them, but each of them have certain problems being viewed in certain browsers and/or screen resolutions, so I&#8217;m having a new one designed.  If you&#8217;re on the greenish looking &#8220;Geek Girl&#8221; blog skin, that&#8217;s the one that works well with most browsers and screen resolutions, but my favorite of the three I have now is the one called &#8220;Sister Toldjah&#8221; and of course that seems to be the one that other browers/resolutions have the most problems with LOL.  I view my pages through IE 5, screen resolution 1024&#215;768.</p>
<p>BTW, for any of you who haven&#8217;t visited Dell&#8217;s blog &#8211; please check it out! He&#8217;s one well spoken gent. <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_smiley.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dell Gines</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/comment-page-1/#comment-16188</link>
		<dc:creator>Dell Gines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 20:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/#comment-16188</guid>
		<description>Like the look of the blog. Wordpress three column?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the look of the blog. Wordpress three column?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie wendelken</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/comment-page-1/#comment-16149</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie wendelken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/#comment-16149</guid>
		<description>I thinkt he groups are losing support in large part b/c there&#039;s not a battle to be fought yet.  Most woemn i know don&#039;t really feel choice tis threatened, so they&#039;re more involved in other aspects of politics- I think there may be a significant change in those numbers if the situation changed.  Other things the current feminists have fought for and been successful- holding men accountable for children they&#039;ve fathered.  Sure, there are still abandoned children- but not as much as 25 years ago, when I was one.  If you know that the state will try and force the guy to support the child, you&#039;ve got more of a choice, don&#039;t you?  25 years ago, all the responsibility fell on the women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thinkt he groups are losing support in large part b/c there&#8217;s not a battle to be fought yet.  Most woemn i know don&#8217;t really feel choice tis threatened, so they&#8217;re more involved in other aspects of politics- I think there may be a significant change in those numbers if the situation changed.  Other things the current feminists have fought for and been successful- holding men accountable for children they&#8217;ve fathered.  Sure, there are still abandoned children- but not as much as 25 years ago, when I was one.  If you know that the state will try and force the guy to support the child, you&#8217;ve got more of a choice, don&#8217;t you?  25 years ago, all the responsibility fell on the women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/comment-page-1/#comment-16019</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/#comment-16019</guid>
		<description>Believe me, not of that happened as a result of the *current* feminist movement.  I credit the early feminist movement for *some* of the advances women have made throughout the years but I largely credit women in general with making great strides in the work force, etc, that NOW deserves no credit for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe me, not of that happened as a result of the *current* feminist movement.  I credit the early feminist movement for *some* of the advances women have made throughout the years but I largely credit women in general with making great strides in the work force, etc, that NOW deserves no credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/comment-page-1/#comment-16014</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/07/nowlosingitspotency/#comment-16014</guid>
		<description>I make it a rule to have feminists out of my life BUT
When the current feminst movement started there were zero female news people, no good roles in either movies or TV, women had a hell of a time getting credit on their own, and they had to put out on the first date.  Now that those things are far in the past the current feminsts have no meaning.  Mission Accomplished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make it a rule to have feminists out of my life BUT<br />
When the current feminst movement started there were zero female news people, no good roles in either movies or TV, women had a hell of a time getting credit on their own, and they had to put out on the first date.  Now that those things are far in the past the current feminsts have no meaning.  Mission Accomplished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
