Comments on: 9-11 Commission Coverup?

By: Sloan

Sloan — Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:23:44 +0000

One more question: If the 9/11 Commission ignored and covered up the information about Able Danger during their “investigation,” what other information did they ignore or cover up?

Maybe we should have a commission to investigate the 9/11 Commission. This time, we’ll staff it with people who don’t have ties to the Clinton administration. I wish we could also keep out any Democrat members of Congress as well, but that’s probably not possible.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:23:47 +0000

AT & Bang: Agree completely. The Gorelick controversy was one conservatives should not have given in to the Dems on (one of many, actually).

Mike: Ya think?

By: Mike on Hilton Head Island

Mike on Hilton Head Island — Sat, 13 Aug 2005 03:46:57 +0000

I said basically the same thing as Orin two days ago…. You think she reads my blog? I should ask for royalty payments.

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Sat, 13 Aug 2005 03:25:19 +0000

- Absolutely ArizonaTeach….. poetic political justice of the fourth kind. I’ll write everyone I can think of in the Conservative leadership and subtly mention her name.

By: ArizonaTeach

ArizonaTeach — Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:54:29 +0000

Thing is, warning signs of Gorelick were around the first time, and the committee, even the conservatives, defended her tooth and nail. It’s gonna take a committee member coming forth and saying something, and I’m not 100% sure that’s gonna happen. Hope it does, because daaaaaaaayyyuuummm. I’d LOVE to get Gorelick sitting opposite the soapbox she used to question others and watch her get roasted.

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:08:18 +0000

- Surprise surprise. The lefties blogsites have gone all but camatos on this story. Yes. Discard any issue immeadiately if it doesn’t serve their agenda or purposes, or can’t be used in some sort of mis-information campaign. Even at a time when all this is beggining to surface, the left, ACLU, and all of the left wing, socialist, communist cabals continue to use lexiconal tricks and specious rehtoric to intermix the non-existant “rights” of Jihadist thugs with the proper and real rights of American citizens. (ie. anti-profiling, anti-transportation security/inspections, anti-law enforcement intervention in general). Its hard not to believe that those on the left have an outright death wish. For their part the ACLU reached a new level of mendacity recently by issuing a public statement that they are “fighting for the religious rights of all Americans”, when in fact everyone over the age of six knows they are obssesively intent on erasing every vestage of religious reference from American society. Losers. Its also notable that the Democrats, particularly gadflys like Kennedy, are suddenly mia….

By: La Shawn Barber's Corner

La Shawn Barber's Corner — Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:33:45 +0000

Blogospheric Conditions

Around the blogosphere:

Power Line here, Power Line there, Power Line everywhere! The lawyer bloggers decided to create a one-stop place to go for the latest headlines. As if they need more traffic, right? Visit Power Line News.

The New York Time…

By: Iowa Voice

Iowa Voice — Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:25:51 +0000

Able Danger And 9/11: Pt II

I’ve been reading and reading and reading just about anything on this story I can get my hands on, and I think I’ve got the basis of a picture, here. The 9/11 Commission was very harsh in it’s criticism of the Intelligence Community for not sharing…