<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About those fake uranium documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:23:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-45246</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/#comment-45246</guid>
		<description>LOL FT ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL FT <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_wink.gif' alt='&#59;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#59;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Tone</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-45196</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Tone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/#comment-45196</guid>
		<description>I was over at the CaliforniaConservative. He had a nice rebuttal in a letter to Chris Matthews that I, for one, believe Matthews doesn&#039;t have the integrity to read, let alone answer.

http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1282 

Comment by PCD @ 10/26/2005 - 3:33 pm 



Wow, that email dropped the show on Hackthews...I mean Matthews.  Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was over at the CaliforniaConservative. He had a nice rebuttal in a letter to Chris Matthews that I, for one, believe Matthews doesn&#8217;t have the integrity to read, let alone answer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1282" rel="nofollow">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1282</a> </p>
<p>Comment by PCD @ 10/26/2005 &#8211; 3:33 pm </p>
<p>Wow, that email dropped the show on Hackthews&#8230;I mean Matthews.  Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-45171</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/#comment-45171</guid>
		<description>It sounds too clever for me. France didn&#039;t want war so they created documents to support the case for war?
 
Yet the French wanted the false documents to be discredited (thus impeding the US, et al) but they didn&#039;t keep strong proof handy and blast that all over the world as we prepared for war?

And with little more effort they could have made it look as if the US had falsified the papers to begin with. But they didn&#039;t do that either?

Even so, sometimes the spies come up with the damnest schemes. And this may have been one. Think how well the idea of killing the Pope worked. Or the French sabotage of the GreenPeace boat. Or killing the priest in Poland just as the Iron Curtain was wobbling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds too clever for me. France didn&#8217;t want war so they created documents to support the case for war?</p>
<p>Yet the French wanted the false documents to be discredited (thus impeding the US, et al) but they didn&#8217;t keep strong proof handy and blast that all over the world as we prepared for war?</p>
<p>And with little more effort they could have made it look as if the US had falsified the papers to begin with. But they didn&#8217;t do that either?</p>
<p>Even so, sometimes the spies come up with the damnest schemes. And this may have been one. Think how well the idea of killing the Pope worked. Or the French sabotage of the GreenPeace boat. Or killing the priest in Poland just as the Iron Curtain was wobbling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-45147</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/#comment-45147</guid>
		<description>Walter, not only that, but the Able Danger group identified both the 9/11 threat and the threat to the USS Cole.  The warnings were stiffled by Jaime Gorelick aides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter, not only that, but the Able Danger group identified both the 9/11 threat and the threat to the USS Cole.  The warnings were stiffled by Jaime Gorelick aides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-45146</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/#comment-45146</guid>
		<description>I was over at the CaliforniaConservative.  He had a nice rebuttal in a letter to Chris Matthews that I, for one, believe Matthews doesn&#039;t have the integrity to read, let alone answer.

http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1282</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was over at the CaliforniaConservative.  He had a nice rebuttal in a letter to Chris Matthews that I, for one, believe Matthews doesn&#8217;t have the integrity to read, let alone answer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1282" rel="nofollow">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1282</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter E. Wallis</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-45145</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter E. Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/#comment-45145</guid>
		<description>The predominance of evidence determined the need to oust Saddam. You use that rule for making decisions because no decision would ever be made in a timely manner if we insisted on 100% on every indicator. Look at the crap that came down when someone said that, some time before 9/11, a briefing had mentioned the possibility that pople might fly airplanes into buildings, yet we didn&#039;t order airplane proof fences around all buildings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The predominance of evidence determined the need to oust Saddam. You use that rule for making decisions because no decision would ever be made in a timely manner if we insisted on 100% on every indicator. Look at the crap that came down when someone said that, some time before 9/11, a briefing had mentioned the possibility that pople might fly airplanes into buildings, yet we didn&#8217;t order airplane proof fences around all buildings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-45142</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/#comment-45142</guid>
		<description>Fat Tone, They didn&#039;t want the world to find out the degree of French arms sold to Saddam after Gulf War I, nor did Chirac want the world to find out about  Chirac&#039;s role in helping Saddam build the reactor that Israel bombed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fat Tone, They didn&#8217;t want the world to find out the degree of French arms sold to Saddam after Gulf War I, nor did Chirac want the world to find out about  Chirac&#8217;s role in helping Saddam build the reactor that Israel bombed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Tone</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-45135</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Tone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/26/about-those-fake-uranium-documents/#comment-45135</guid>
		<description>The Frogs....knee deep in oil for food, and knee deep in manufactured intel......how about they just stick to Brie and wine ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Frogs&#8230;.knee deep in oil for food, and knee deep in manufactured intel&#8230;&#8230;how about they just stick to Brie and wine ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
