<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seattle Post Intelligencer gets Bush claim wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-47121</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 14:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-47121</guid>
		<description>Nice side step, h.garner.  We all see how partisan you are, and how you give a pass to fellow traveller leftists.

In case you haven&#039;t figured out what that means, let me tell you.  It means your charges will just go into the circular file as another bloody screaming leftie who isn&#039;t in power and will say and do anything to get power, except hold his/her fellow travellers to the same standards as those you criticize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice side step, h.garner.  We all see how partisan you are, and how you give a pass to fellow traveller leftists.</p>
<p>In case you haven&#8217;t figured out what that means, let me tell you.  It means your charges will just go into the circular file as another bloody screaming leftie who isn&#8217;t in power and will say and do anything to get power, except hold his/her fellow travellers to the same standards as those you criticize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h.garner</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-47120</link>
		<dc:creator>h.garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 14:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-47120</guid>
		<description>&quot;How convenient of a slip up. Notice mine?&quot;

Akin to the mixup of &quot;bush&quot; and &quot;bush administration,&quot; to some kind of minds.

&quot;She and Joe posed in Vanity Fair BEFORE she was supposedly &quot;outed&quot;&quot;

Oh boy.

&quot;Kerry committed Treason when he met with the VietCong in Paris and then advocated for them while he was still a commissioned Naval officer and while we were still at war with them.&quot;

Was he advocating for them or for us? Makes a difference.  Also hard to say there was material Aid and comfort. But thats just all legalese and &#039;technicalities&#039; like perjury, which we can safely ignore.

&quot;Pat Leahy got thrown off the Senate Intelligence Committee for leaking covert operations (and blowing the covers for the people on those operations).&quot;

How awful. Of course we&#039;ve run down how they weren&#039;t on magazine covers, etc... 

Maybe someone should out the rest of the CIA, like the stuff that hit the front pages of the Post this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How convenient of a slip up. Notice mine?&#8221;</p>
<p>Akin to the mixup of &#8220;bush&#8221; and &#8220;bush administration,&#8221; to some kind of minds.</p>
<p>&#8220;She and Joe posed in Vanity Fair BEFORE she was supposedly &#8220;outed&#8221;"</p>
<p>Oh boy.</p>
<p>&#8220;Kerry committed Treason when he met with the VietCong in Paris and then advocated for them while he was still a commissioned Naval officer and while we were still at war with them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Was he advocating for them or for us? Makes a difference.  Also hard to say there was material Aid and comfort. But thats just all legalese and &#8216;technicalities&#8217; like perjury, which we can safely ignore.</p>
<p>&#8220;Pat Leahy got thrown off the Senate Intelligence Committee for leaking covert operations (and blowing the covers for the people on those operations).&#8221;</p>
<p>How awful. Of course we&#8217;ve run down how they weren&#8217;t on magazine covers, etc&#8230; </p>
<p>Maybe someone should out the rest of the CIA, like the stuff that hit the front pages of the Post this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-47117</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-47117</guid>
		<description>h.garner.

Kerry committed Treason when he met with the VietCong in Paris and then advocated for them while he was still a commissioned Naval officer and while we were still at war with them.

Pat Leahy got thrown off the Senate Intelligence Committee for leaking covert operations (and blowing the covers for the people on those operations).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>h.garner.</p>
<p>Kerry committed Treason when he met with the VietCong in Paris and then advocated for them while he was still a commissioned Naval officer and while we were still at war with them.</p>
<p>Pat Leahy got thrown off the Senate Intelligence Committee for leaking covert operations (and blowing the covers for the people on those operations).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Rob</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-47111</link>
		<dc:creator>J Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-47111</guid>
		<description>I am continually amused by the repitition of the phrase, &quot;outing an undercover operative&quot; when she was in fact neither. She had not been undercover since she married Joe Wilson. She and Joe posed in &lt;i&gt;Vanity Fair&lt;/i&gt; BEFORE she was supposedly &quot;outed&quot;
I am tired of this post-&quot;Fitzmas&quot; I-didn&#039;t-get-what-I-wanted tantrum. One person indicted (for lying about a non-existant crime). As yet there is no conviction (at least not one that counts legally).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am continually amused by the repitition of the phrase, &#8220;outing an undercover operative&#8221; when she was in fact neither. She had not been undercover since she married Joe Wilson. She and Joe posed in <i>Vanity Fair</i> BEFORE she was supposedly &#8220;outed&#8221;<br />
I am tired of this post-&#8221;Fitzmas&#8221; I-didn&#8217;t-get-what-I-wanted tantrum. One person indicted (for lying about a non-existant crime). As yet there is no conviction (at least not one that counts legally).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46941</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 23:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46941</guid>
		<description>Interesting how an indictment of lying to a Grand Jury about where he heard of Plame translates into a threat to national security.  The indictment has absolutely nothing to do with the outing of a covert agent, which Plame was not (she was a fricking desk jocky).  He couldn&#039;t have outed her even if he wanted to.

There was no crime here outside of possible perjury (and it&#039;s just an indictment, it doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s guilty yet).  There is no threat to national security and no agent was outed.  Saying there is demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of the issue at hand.  It would be best for the Democrats to let this go and move one (if you&#039;ll forgive the expression).  Of course, they&#039;re to busy playing gotcha games to understand that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how an indictment of lying to a Grand Jury about where he heard of Plame translates into a threat to national security.  The indictment has absolutely nothing to do with the outing of a covert agent, which Plame was not (she was a fricking desk jocky).  He couldn&#8217;t have outed her even if he wanted to.</p>
<p>There was no crime here outside of possible perjury (and it&#8217;s just an indictment, it doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s guilty yet).  There is no threat to national security and no agent was outed.  Saying there is demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of the issue at hand.  It would be best for the Democrats to let this go and move one (if you&#8217;ll forgive the expression).  Of course, they&#8217;re to busy playing gotcha games to understand that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46937</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 22:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46937</guid>
		<description>harmer wrote, &quot;It looks like a slip-up.&quot;

How convenient of a slip up. Notice mine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>harmer wrote, &#8220;It looks like a slip-up.&#8221;</p>
<p>How convenient of a slip up. Notice mine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h.garner</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46927</link>
		<dc:creator>h.garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 21:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46927</guid>
		<description>&quot; When you come here and demand John Kerry and Pat Leahy be arrested and frog marched out of the senate for treason, then I&#039;ll believe you are ethical, until then, you are just a partisan hack.&quot;

Whats treasonous about them? And whats hackery about pointing out the administrations changing standards? 

&quot;Nope. But when the SPI writes they should write that Scott McClellan said as opposed to Bush saying.&quot;

It looks like a slip-up. Should just have said &#039;the administration&#039; or &#039;the bush administration.&#039;

&quot;And it would be nice to see the entire answer in context not just an interpretation of his answer as the SPI did.&quot;

Its not that much of an interpretation. Scottie said anyone involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; When you come here and demand John Kerry and Pat Leahy be arrested and frog marched out of the senate for treason, then I&#8217;ll believe you are ethical, until then, you are just a partisan hack.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whats treasonous about them? And whats hackery about pointing out the administrations changing standards? </p>
<p>&#8220;Nope. But when the SPI writes they should write that Scott McClellan said as opposed to Bush saying.&#8221;</p>
<p>It looks like a slip-up. Should just have said &#8216;the administration&#8217; or &#8216;the bush administration.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;And it would be nice to see the entire answer in context not just an interpretation of his answer as the SPI did.&#8221;</p>
<p>Its not that much of an interpretation. Scottie said anyone involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46904</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46904</guid>
		<description>h.garner wrote, &quot;If people want to tell me that Scottie is not to be believed when he speaks on admin policy, then fine.&quot;

Nope. But when the SPI writes they should write that Scott McClellan said as opposed to Bush saying. Would be nice to see the truth. And it would be nice to see the entire answer in context not just an interpretation of his answer as the SPI did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>h.garner wrote, &#8220;If people want to tell me that Scottie is not to be believed when he speaks on admin policy, then fine.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope. But when the SPI writes they should write that Scott McClellan said as opposed to Bush saying. Would be nice to see the truth. And it would be nice to see the entire answer in context not just an interpretation of his answer as the SPI did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46895</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46895</guid>
		<description>h,garner, I&#039;m taking you lack of ethics up with YOU.  When you come here and demand John Kerry and Pat Leahy be arrested and frog marched out of the senate for treason, then I&#039;ll believe you are ethical, until then, you are just a partisan hack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>h,garner, I&#8217;m taking you lack of ethics up with YOU.  When you come here and demand John Kerry and Pat Leahy be arrested and frog marched out of the senate for treason, then I&#8217;ll believe you are ethical, until then, you are just a partisan hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h.garner</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46890</link>
		<dc:creator>h.garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46890</guid>
		<description>&quot;I didn&#039;t know that Scott was Bush and Bush was Scott.&quot;

The guy is the spokesperson. If there is anyone that can be charged with speaking for administration policy, it is the spokesperson, right? 

If people want to tell me that Scottie is not to be believed when he speaks on admin policy, then fine. 

&quot;Also, to both you and h. garner, last I checked Scott McClellan wasn&#039;t the President. &quot;

He&#039;s the spokesperson. Does that mean nothing? Do his words mean nothing? Does he speak on policy?

&quot;Why do you and h.garner and the other liberals insist on holding the Bush administration to a higher standard than you yourselves practice?&quot;

What do you know about my ethics? I don&#039;t know what standard I&#039;m holding bush to. Just pointing that they have changed. If you think thats a bad thing, take it up with bush (or scottie).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I didn&#8217;t know that Scott was Bush and Bush was Scott.&#8221;</p>
<p>The guy is the spokesperson. If there is anyone that can be charged with speaking for administration policy, it is the spokesperson, right? </p>
<p>If people want to tell me that Scottie is not to be believed when he speaks on admin policy, then fine. </p>
<p>&#8220;Also, to both you and h. garner, last I checked Scott McClellan wasn&#8217;t the President. &#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s the spokesperson. Does that mean nothing? Do his words mean nothing? Does he speak on policy?</p>
<p>&#8220;Why do you and h.garner and the other liberals insist on holding the Bush administration to a higher standard than you yourselves practice?&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you know about my ethics? I don&#8217;t know what standard I&#8217;m holding bush to. Just pointing that they have changed. If you think thats a bad thing, take it up with bush (or scottie).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46889</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46889</guid>
		<description>Again, Elendril, like a true liberal attacks without acknowledging previous arguments.

What you going to do Elendril when Libby is found not guilty?  He&#039;s not indicted for outing Plame, and neither is anyone else, but Joe Wilson should be indicted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, Elendril, like a true liberal attacks without acknowledging previous arguments.</p>
<p>What you going to do Elendril when Libby is found not guilty?  He&#8217;s not indicted for outing Plame, and neither is anyone else, but Joe Wilson should be indicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46888</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46888</guid>
		<description>In denial?? GMAB.  And don&#039;t even go there with the &quot;scared&quot; stuff.  You guys were pitching fits Friday because Rove didn&#039;t get an indictment handed to him - and are scared yourselves once this is all said and done that he ... the guy you guys wanted marched out whether in handcuffs or whether it came from a resignation - won&#039;t get indicted at all.  Oh, and if this is about &quot;national security&quot; to most people pushing this on the left, then I&#039;m Martha Stewart.

To repeat: Scott McClellan isn&#039;t the President.  Your posting GHWB&#039;s comments about this is supposed to mean what exactly ...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In denial?? GMAB.  And don&#8217;t even go there with the &#8220;scared&#8221; stuff.  You guys were pitching fits Friday because Rove didn&#8217;t get an indictment handed to him &#8211; and are scared yourselves once this is all said and done that he &#8230; the guy you guys wanted marched out whether in handcuffs or whether it came from a resignation &#8211; won&#8217;t get indicted at all.  Oh, and if this is about &#8220;national security&#8221; to most people pushing this on the left, then I&#8217;m Martha Stewart.</p>
<p>To repeat: Scott McClellan isn&#8217;t the President.  Your posting GHWB&#8217;s comments about this is supposed to mean what exactly &#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elendril</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46884</link>
		<dc:creator>Elendril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46884</guid>
		<description>Twisting the president&#039;s words?  Man you guys are in denial.  Scared that &quot;the Architect&quot; might drop your president&#039;s leash?  Or that a sitting VP may have purposefully outed an undercover CIA operative?  Why don&#039;t you ask Georgie&#039;s dad what he thinks about naming CIA operatives.  

&lt;em&gt;Bush himself stated on September 30, 2003, that he would &quot;take appropriate action&quot; against &quot;anybody in my administration who leaked classified information.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&quot;If someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration,&quot; Mr. Bush said in response to a question, after declaring, &quot;I don&#039;t know all the facts; I want to know all the facts.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;


And btw, Scotty is the WH press secretary, and as such is a direct spokesperson for the WH and the president.  When Scott says something, it is common to report is as &quot;the White House has stated...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twisting the president&#8217;s words?  Man you guys are in denial.  Scared that &#8220;the Architect&#8221; might drop your president&#8217;s leash?  Or that a sitting VP may have purposefully outed an undercover CIA operative?  Why don&#8217;t you ask Georgie&#8217;s dad what he thinks about naming CIA operatives.  </p>
<p><em>Bush himself stated on September 30, 2003, that he would &#8220;take appropriate action&#8221; against &#8220;anybody in my administration who leaked classified information.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;If someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration,&#8221; Mr. Bush said in response to a question, after declaring, &#8220;I don&#8217;t know all the facts; I want to know all the facts.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>And btw, Scotty is the WH press secretary, and as such is a direct spokesperson for the WH and the president.  When Scott says something, it is common to report is as &#8220;the White House has stated&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46882</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46882</guid>
		<description>Baklava, not to mention selling the Chinese missle and nuclear weapons secrets for a few campaign donations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baklava, not to mention selling the Chinese missle and nuclear weapons secrets for a few campaign donations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theroxylandr</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-46880</link>
		<dc:creator>theroxylandr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/11/01/seattle-post-intelligencer-gets-bush-claim-wrong/#comment-46880</guid>
		<description>Actually WH press secretary said explicitly about firing anyone involved. I guess whatever he sais on morning briefings is just the movement of the air, nobody takes him seriously anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually WH press secretary said explicitly about firing anyone involved. I guess whatever he sais on morning briefings is just the movement of the air, nobody takes him seriously anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
