Comments on: Pakistani man killed his daughters to salvage ‘honor’

By: Steve Skubinna

Steve Skubinna — Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:39:39 +0000

Fortunately for you, Steve, you shall never have to put your convictions to the test. There are plenty of people in need of mental counseling who nonetheless place themselves in harm’s way so you can safely sneer at them. Wallow in your cowardice, and continue to claim moral superiority.

If nothing is worth fighting for, then nothing is worth living for.

By: Baklava

Baklava — Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:48:32 +0000

Steve, your post of 8:05 gives a solution that would’ve led to more bloodbath. The children would’ve died as yourself.

You should apologize for your name calling and for stating that anyone who wants less bloodbath with better solutions than your needs mental counseling. Until that apology you will continue to be told you want bloodbath. ANd why do you want that Steve?

By: Improbulus Maximus

Improbulus Maximus — Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:21:03 +0000

Wow steve, spoken like a true, ineffectual, inconsequential wuss who would stand by and watch children be murdered while whining to the murderer about peace and love. You, as much as anyone else, are a prime example of why liberals should not even be allowed to live in America, much less vote.
I would have shoved the knife up his fourth point of contact and beaten him to death with my bare hands, whereas you would have offered him a hug and some Kool-Aid.

By: steve

steve — Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:05:42 +0000

I would not have killed the man but, I would have stopped him or died trying—unarmed. Any person who uses violence to redress any perceived problem needs serious mental counseling. Any person, including bush and the rest of the violent neo-cons. Peace

By: Baklava

Baklava — Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:22:52 +0000

Steve, How would you have stopped him within the seconds needed to stop him before he slit another throat.

2) He warned the woman that if she tried to stop him he’d kill her.

3) If you were in the woman’s shoes, I’d say the kids would’ve been killed because your policies lead to more bloodbath. You are for bloodbath? Why?

By: Steve Skubinna

Steve Skubinna — Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:28:25 +0000

Well, Steve, I would cheerfully have killed this two legged vermin. He’s not a human being, only a predator shaped like one, and he and those who believe as he does should not be metabolizing oxygen. You could not have “stopped” him, you could only have delayed his murder of a woman and innocent children for however long it took him to dispatch you first.

Try reasoning with the HIV virus.

Peace.

By: steve

steve — Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:04:07 +0000

I would not have killed the man but, I would have stopped him. Peace

By: Donna

Donna — Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:39:23 +0000

The love of many has grown cold…

By: Baklava

Baklava — Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:42:10 +0000

Steve, But what would you have done to stop the man if you were in the same room!?

The woman said she was asking him to spare the children….. Your stated idea didn’t work…

Results of policies means something. Look at the results.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:37:27 +0000

At last.

By: steve

steve — Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:11:11 +0000

I agree 100% with you on this one Sister. Peace