Comments on: The Carl Levin-Jack Abramoff connection

By: andrew

andrew — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:03:53 +0000

Is what levin did illegal.

By: PCD

PCD — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:34:29 +0000

Andrew, say goodbye to Carl Levin, then. I hope you have a very warm heart as he isn’t the only donkey going down.

By: andrew

andrew — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:21:58 +0000

“Andrew, when a Democrat goes down as one of the bribed, will you be alright? ”

The bipartisanship will be heartwarming.

By: PCD

PCD — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:18:16 +0000

Andrew, when a Democrat goes down as one of the bribed, will you be alright? you won’t commit suicide or hurt yourself in any way, will you?

By: andrew

andrew — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:07:47 +0000

“Andrew, you are hopeless. You can’t see that, can you?”

It is hopeless isn’t it? Of course Abramoff was doing illegal things with people he couldn’t trust.

By: PCD

PCD — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:57:22 +0000

Again, you psychotically do a Kerry. Andrew, you are hopeless. You can’t see that, can you?

By: andrew

andrew — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:48:02 +0000

“andrew, you just dismissed that any bribes, especally to Democrats like Harry Reid were illegal. ”

I said its likely he did illegal things with people he could trust. And for the poster boy of the young republicans and the regan revolution, would that be democrats or GOP?

By: PCD

PCD — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:15:16 +0000

andrew, you just dismissed that any bribes, especally to Democrats like Harry Reid were illegal. You only said monies to the GOP was illegal, only a few pennies would you admit may have been legal.

By: andrew

andrew — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:00:46 +0000

“That post right there Andrew. ”

But that post just means that were bribes went was likely the GOP. Not that all the money the GOP got was illegal.

By: Baklava

Baklava — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:38:19 +0000

That post right there Andrew.

By: andrew

andrew — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:08:50 +0000

“andrew, your previous posts make it quite clear that you consider money from Abrahamoff to the GOP to be bribes, but money from Abrahamoff to the DNC, and to Democrat members to Congess to be clean donations.”

Which posts? I highly doubt all the money he passed around was tainted. I guess though, that if he were to do dirty things, it would be with people he could trust. Would that be the GOP or the dems?

By: PCD

PCD — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 19:32:04 +0000

AT, I disagree with the view of what Andrew is asking. He’s playing like Ronnie Earle in texas, in that Abramoff donations to GOP is dirty or illegal, but show a Democrat, like Earle, taking money from the same Abramoff in the same fashion/method, andrew is silent or defends it as clean donation.

By: ArizonaTeach

ArizonaTeach — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 18:57:54 +0000

While I agree with your sentiment, PCD, what Andrew asks IS an important question (I understand that a lot of the money being reported as “from Abramoff” is actually from his clients), but granted, the insistence of liberals to crucify the right on the barest suggestion of wrongness never seems to equate to the “get out of anything free” card they give to themselves.

By: PCD

PCD — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:33:12 +0000

andrew, your previous posts make it quite clear that you consider money from Abrahamoff to the GOP to be bribes, but money from Abrahamoff to the DNC, and to Democrat members to Congess to be clean donations.

We know your are partisan and wish to smear the GOP while not holding the Donkeys to the same standard.

By: andrew

andrew — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:18:43 +0000

“andrew, in your eyes GOP geting donations is a bribe, but Donkeys getting money from the same source is honest donations.”

I don’t think everyone that abramoff gave to got the money improperly. Was it? and who are you to see through my eyes?