<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US media will print Abu Ghraib photos but not controversial cartoons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Senor Valquez</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-79748</link>
		<dc:creator>Senor Valquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-79748</guid>
		<description>New article on leaked additional Abu Ghraib pictures now at the Irony Party of Australia electronic pamphlet:

US Concerned New Torture Pictures Could Give Wrong Impression 

A spokesman for the US State Department has described the broadcast of newly leaked pictures of the mistreatment of prisoners held by the Coalition in Iraq by as &#039;unnecessarily provocative and irresponsible&#039;, suggesting the screening of images of horrific abuse could create an impression the world&#039;s only superpower is less than scrupulously and fanatically fair and humane in its handling and interrogation of prisoners captured by necessity in the course of the Global War on Terror. 

http://www.ironyparty.org/newsfeed.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New article on leaked additional Abu Ghraib pictures now at the Irony Party of Australia electronic pamphlet:</p>
<p>US Concerned New Torture Pictures Could Give Wrong Impression </p>
<p>A spokesman for the US State Department has described the broadcast of newly leaked pictures of the mistreatment of prisoners held by the Coalition in Iraq by as &#8216;unnecessarily provocative and irresponsible&#8217;, suggesting the screening of images of horrific abuse could create an impression the world&#8217;s only superpower is less than scrupulously and fanatically fair and humane in its handling and interrogation of prisoners captured by necessity in the course of the Global War on Terror. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ironyparty.org/newsfeed.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ironyparty.org/newsfeed.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-76483</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-76483</guid>
		<description>Chirac &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060208/ap_on_re_mi_ea/prophet_drawings_125;_ylt=AjgmWxNozSN_h1ZdqlokkAjbEfQA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;slams media&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chirac <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060208/ap_on_re_mi_ea/prophet_drawings_125;_ylt=AjgmWxNozSN_h1ZdqlokkAjbEfQA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl" rel="nofollow">slams media</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogagog</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75853</link>
		<dc:creator>blogagog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75853</guid>
		<description>It is unimportant who can rightfully issue a fatwa.  It only matters if it is acted on.  If I issue a fatwa on Israel and a palestinian kills some Israelis, who cares if I had the right to issue it?

The same would go for a fatwa on terrorists.  I&#039;d be very happy to see some of these coming from the Muslim world, religiously legal or not.  I&#039;d be curious to see how many fatwas are issued that don&#039;t involve killing someone.  I&#039;m sure it happens once in a while so they can keep the &#039;religion of peace&#039; misnomer, but I&#039;d bet it&#039;s pretty rare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is unimportant who can rightfully issue a fatwa.  It only matters if it is acted on.  If I issue a fatwa on Israel and a palestinian kills some Israelis, who cares if I had the right to issue it?</p>
<p>The same would go for a fatwa on terrorists.  I&#8217;d be very happy to see some of these coming from the Muslim world, religiously legal or not.  I&#8217;d be curious to see how many fatwas are issued that don&#8217;t involve killing someone.  I&#8217;m sure it happens once in a while so they can keep the &#8216;religion of peace&#8217; misnomer, but I&#8217;d bet it&#8217;s pretty rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75745</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 04:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75745</guid>
		<description>&quot;Andrew you have mastered the lefts fine art of willful ignorance and totally missed the point as usual. &quot;

I agree. I am ignorant of who you want issuing fatwas. Since you know all about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Andrew you have mastered the lefts fine art of willful ignorance and totally missed the point as usual. &#8221;</p>
<p>I agree. I am ignorant of who you want issuing fatwas. Since you know all about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bang Hunter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75744</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bang Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 03:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75744</guid>
		<description>- Andrew you have mastered the lefts fine art of willful ignorance and totally missed the point as usual. Hopefully you&#039;ll all be just as adroit at falling on your Marxist faces at the ballot box in the future....

- Bang **==</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Andrew you have mastered the lefts fine art of willful ignorance and totally missed the point as usual. Hopefully you&#8217;ll all be just as adroit at falling on your Marxist faces at the ballot box in the future&#8230;.</p>
<p>- Bang <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_flag.gif' alt='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' class='wp-smiley' width='25' height='18' title='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75743</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 03:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75743</guid>
		<description>&quot; How many Fatwa&#039;s have you issued against the murdering heathans that are running around commiting heineous war crimes in the name of Allah?&quot;

Not everyone can issue fatwas. And not everyone who does it is doing it properly. Like bin laden? He&#039;s not supposed to be doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; How many Fatwa&#8217;s have you issued against the murdering heathans that are running around commiting heineous war crimes in the name of Allah?&#8221;</p>
<p>Not everyone can issue fatwas. And not everyone who does it is doing it properly. Like bin laden? He&#8217;s not supposed to be doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bang Hunter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75741</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bang Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 03:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75741</guid>
		<description>- I won&#039;t even respond to the moon-bats anymore. When a person can think themselves into enough of a pretzel to equate (angry debate and name calling/political cartoons) = (blowing up women and children/cutting off the heads of civilians/using IUD&#039;s in public places to achieve max carnage) I think they&#039;ve lost the capacity to rational thought. So why even bother.

Soooooooo my &quot;Moderate Islamic Clerics/Leaders&quot;. How many Fatwa&#039;s have you issued against the murdering heathans that are running around commiting heineous war crimes in the name of Allah?

- Bang **==</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- I won&#8217;t even respond to the moon-bats anymore. When a person can think themselves into enough of a pretzel to equate (angry debate and name calling/political cartoons) = (blowing up women and children/cutting off the heads of civilians/using IUD&#8217;s in public places to achieve max carnage) I think they&#8217;ve lost the capacity to rational thought. So why even bother.</p>
<p>Soooooooo my &#8220;Moderate Islamic Clerics/Leaders&#8221;. How many Fatwa&#8217;s have you issued against the murdering heathans that are running around commiting heineous war crimes in the name of Allah?</p>
<p>- Bang <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_flag.gif' alt='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' class='wp-smiley' width='25' height='18' title='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benning</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75711</link>
		<dc:creator>benning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 01:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75711</guid>
		<description>And CAIR has not been silent on this. As expected.

Andrew, the muslims have been showing these cartoons, plus the ones added by muslims, to muslims. That&#039;s how they incite the ignorant to fury.

tommy, you might look up the race riots in NYC during the Civil War. I think you&#039;ll find quite a few since then, too. Weren&#039;t there some with Al Sharpton&#039;s sanction? Y&#039;all ain&#039;t quite as pure as you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And CAIR has not been silent on this. As expected.</p>
<p>Andrew, the muslims have been showing these cartoons, plus the ones added by muslims, to muslims. That&#8217;s how they incite the ignorant to fury.</p>
<p>tommy, you might look up the race riots in NYC during the Civil War. I think you&#8217;ll find quite a few since then, too. Weren&#8217;t there some with Al Sharpton&#8217;s sanction? Y&#8217;all ain&#8217;t quite as pure as you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoisyRoom.net &#187; The media taking sides</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75691</link>
		<dc:creator>NoisyRoom.net &#187; The media taking sides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75691</guid>
		<description>[...] Sister Toldjah has an excellent post about the latest example of the MSM&#039;s ideologically driven reporting. In the last couple of days, most American media outlets have refrained from printing controversial political cartoons &quot;out of respect for Islam&quot;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sister Toldjah has an excellent post about the latest example of the MSM&#8217;s ideologically driven reporting. In the last couple of days, most American media outlets have refrained from printing controversial political cartoons &#8220;out of respect for Islam&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75673</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75673</guid>
		<description>steve, the Muslim population of the US has been too silent on many issues.  They should have been outraged by 9/11 and been very vocal in condemning Bin Laden and his followers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steve, the Muslim population of the US has been too silent on many issues.  They should have been outraged by 9/11 and been very vocal in condemning Bin Laden and his followers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75664</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75664</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75663</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75663</guid>
		<description>The interesting part of this story that nobody seems to mention is the fact that the large Muslim population in the United States has been very quiet on this entire episode. Maybe they are the enlightened ones? Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting part of this story that nobody seems to mention is the fact that the large Muslim population in the United States has been very quiet on this entire episode. Maybe they are the enlightened ones? Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The media taking sides &#187; 4thelittleguy.com</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75508</link>
		<dc:creator>The media taking sides &#187; 4thelittleguy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75508</guid>
		<description>[...] Sister Toldjah has an excellent post about the latest example of the MSM&#8217;s ideologically driven reporting. In the last couple of days, most American media outlets have refrained from printing controversial political cartoons &#8220;out of respect for Islam&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sister Toldjah has an excellent post about the latest example of the MSM&#8217;s ideologically driven reporting. In the last couple of days, most American media outlets have refrained from printing controversial political cartoons &#8220;out of respect for Islam&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75502</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75502</guid>
		<description>There was a piece on Drudge showing the timeline of the cartoons.  They were originally published in September.  So obviously there is something going on that these people are only now rioting over them.  I mean they can&#039;t possibly be so backward that it takes 5 months for a reaction.  

I also find it rich that Steve is scolding the author about taking things out of context.  Good Lord, what next, &quot;A&quot;s on Bart&#039;s report card??  =)) - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a piece on Drudge showing the timeline of the cartoons.  They were originally published in September.  So obviously there is something going on that these people are only now rioting over them.  I mean they can&#8217;t possibly be so backward that it takes 5 months for a reaction.  </p>
<p>I also find it rich that Steve is scolding the author about taking things out of context.  Good Lord, what next, &#8220;A&#8221;s on Bart&#8217;s report card??  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' /> &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-will-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/comment-page-1/#comment-75489</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/06/us-media-theyll-print-abu-ghraib-photos-but-not-controversial-cartoons/#comment-75489</guid>
		<description>MY understanding is fine, tommy.  It&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;you&lt;/strong&gt; who don&#039;t understand - in your quest to equate Christians with Islamofascists.  So many of your pals on the left love to do this in order to try and nullify the comments of Christians on issues relating to religious extremism.  &quot;Bbbbbbut ya&#039;ll do it too!&quot; seems to be the popular rallying cry from the usual suspects.  Sorry, but it&#039;s not going to work this time around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MY understanding is fine, tommy.  It&#8217;s <strong>you</strong> who don&#8217;t understand &#8211; in your quest to equate Christians with Islamofascists.  So many of your pals on the left love to do this in order to try and nullify the comments of Christians on issues relating to religious extremism.  &#8220;Bbbbbbut ya&#8217;ll do it too!&#8221; seems to be the popular rallying cry from the usual suspects.  Sorry, but it&#8217;s not going to work this time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
