| CBS News | 0 | |
| WaPo | 0 | |
| Zogby | North Dakota Senator Byron Dorgan Trails in Potential 2010 Senate Match-up |
0 |
| SF Chron | 0 | |
| KDVR | 0 |
Audacity of Truth
Useful idiots
Yesterday the President gave a speech that contained details about a planned terrorist attack on LA back in 2002 that was foiled thanks to the hard work of US intelligence services working in harmony with other countries who are also taking part in the global war on terror.
As this article makes clear, the press has been pressing the President for details on this, as well as other foiled terrorist attacks, that he mentioned briefly in a speech back in October. No doubt in an effort to appease the press as well as Democrats who were skeptical of those claims, the President revealed details of the planned-but-foiled LA attack yesterday.
James Taranto outlines the Democratic reponse to the President’s discussion of the foiled 2002 attack. Once you read it, you’ll realize why I titled this post the way I did.
Hint: it includes a quote from our favorite Senator.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
10 Responses to “Useful idiots”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
Useful idiots, yes…but not to US.
Fantastic! Obviously it isn’t just me that thinks that the only way to satisfy a Democrat is allow another attack.
According to ex-CIA analyst Pillar, Rockefeller was correct. bush and Co. “cherry-picked” intelligence to support their invasion of Iraq. The invasion was put on “go” the day after the Towers were hit. So don’t you think it might be a good idea to warn certain heads of state that the explosions they will soon hear will be confined only to Iraq? Peace
Absolutely – You always want to be sure you pass the word around to give your enemies a heads up before you go to war.
- Bang
When is Rockerfeller scheduled to visit Iran btw? I think he’s got some valuable information for them…
The 10:52 poster really is off topic.
It does seem that Dem leadership will not be happy until we are attacked again. But if we are we will then be regaled with “What did he know and when did he know it” comments.
It never seems to be enough tho. There comes a time when too much rehetoric is grows tiresome. It just grows old. This is about keep us safe, not about nit picking on how it is done, or just how savage our enemy is. If you don’t know, I would suggest that you find some photos of the World Trade Center, and compare them to the hole that is there now. – Lorica
If bush is allowed to continue on his present course you can rest assured that we will be hit again. Here is a fact: no matter what bush does he is now damned. Peace
So you wish steve.
If we get hit again, I know EXACTLY where to place blame and that would be the Democrats.
The Democrats have no clue on how to protect the US.
The Democrats have no plan for the US, in economy, jobs, heath care (besides universal health care), nor do they have an inkling on National Security. Thier answer is let the UN deal with it…and we all know how well that corrupt organization does things.
You can jingle around in your bells and burn your bra steve but that will not help us be any safer, and people like you are a schizm in our society. You fail to realize what danger your in till your dead and you and people like you are more dangerous to the US than regular Democrats because at least THEY have sense to know they will lose elections if we are attacked again.
I would love it if both sides would quit playing politics with National Security and start taking this seriously. Yes, I know Republicans seem to be, but even there I have seen partisan politics, but nothing that comes close to the defeatist, surrender politics the Democrats wish to take the US down on that road.
Lets hear your conspiracy thories now steve. I mean we had NY hit and heard that LA was going to be hit but was thwarted. These, one could argue, are very LIBERAL places. Where is the consiracy theory that the Republicans are targeting Liberal cities? C’mon, I know you been thinking it.
Going with that thought, you would think Liberals would wise up since the attacks have been on Liberal Cities, yet they still wish to apologize to the Terrorists, and sympathize with them…we must understand why they are doing these things. We must realize what we have done and repent. Liberals, Useful idiots indeed.
Hating Bush is not a plan.
Have a plan, some direction, because people like you are what is going to drive the Democrat Party into extinction in my opinion.
1) Democrats accuse the President of raising false fears about further terrorist attacks.
2) President provides information about one instance in which a terrorist attack was foiled by collaboration with our international partners.
3) Democrats accuse the President of playing political games.
The only conclusion I can draw is that the Democrats have neither the fortitude nor the moral clarity to understand the full scope of the threat to us. Thank God we have a President who does.
Folks, we have to ensure that these clowns do not grasp the levers of power again in this country for a long time to come. We won’t do it their way — i.e., vandalizing Party headquarters and stealing computers, slashing tires on election workers’ cars and buses, getting physically abusive at rallies, and registering dead voters. We’ll do it by getting the truth out to people…through alternative media outlets, through blogs, whatever it takes…and letting them make up their own minds at the ballot box.
Sloan, you are a thinking American. You figured it out. Congratulations!
Now, your mission is to explain it all to steve, our troll. peace
Heheheeee!