Comments on: Conservative debate: when passion turns to poison

By: Sister Toldjah » What he said

Sister Toldjah » What he said — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 21:07:26 +0000

[...] This is yet another example of how sometimes conservative debate can turn from passion to poison. [...]

By: G Monster

G Monster — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:14:12 +0000

anne came to power as an answer to michael moore. although, i agree she does go way over the top, she is needed as a counterweight to barbara streisand, michael moore, al gore, john kerry, the list is just way too long on the left. but i am glad she is out there, giving the left a taste of thier own medicine.

By: reverse_vampyr

reverse_vampyr — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:59:30 +0000

Two tokes over the line

Ann Coulter is one of conservatism’s loudest voices. And unfortunately, she’s used it last Friday to behave like an ass (as in Democrat) while speaking at CPAC. I’m outraged with Lefty nuts make comments like that about President Bush. And I’m just…

By: Amy Proctor

Amy Proctor — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:43:01 +0000

In Defense of Ann Coulter?

I thought Ann Coulter was also speaking about “radical Islamists” who are “evildoers”, “bloody murderers” and “bastards” as well. And what about beloved free speech? Supporting Denmark’s free speech to criticize Mohammad and Islam, but not An…

By: A Hermit

A Hermit — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:58:22 +0000

Seems to me the really important part of this story, and the part most commentators are missing, is not that Anee “A little local fascism is a good thing” Coulter says stuff like this, it’s that she gets applause, and even standing ovations, from her conservative audiences when she says them…

It’s nice to see a few bloggers finally deciding it’s time to distance themselves from Crazy Annie, but it’s hard to deny the popularity of her violent rhetoric within the conservative movement.

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:54:20 +0000

PC whining and the continued efforts in re-inventing words is about as close to a complete waste of time as we might ever get apart from showing videos to a sightless, earless aliens that clearly lack any abilities for a comprehensive discussion for the distinct purposes of understanding say—–anything. No Steve, this is not about you.

Imagine if you will, 200 years from now, some archeologist sifting through the history, comes across things like the current ongoing cartoon joke and in doing so, discovers the term “raghead”. Was this admittedly derogatory term the reason behind the massive war and why there aren’t any “ragheads” left to answer the question? Or is it because of the historical evidence of an extreme hate filled evil bunch of jerks, that hijacked the Islam faith and brought the ire of all true peace loving people down upon them like mosquitoes on warm sunny day in the swamps of Africa?

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:26:42 +0000

- Amy I’m no expert but I think its a derogetary term, not racist. Something like when someone calls you a “fish eater” or a Jew a “heeb”. Derogetory names inflame people because they are direct attacks on you personally, generally inferring you are inferior in some way. In the case of Islamic Jahidists its unclear why anyone would see them as uncivilized or inferior just because they seem to still be living in the 5th century. Go figure…

- Bang

By: sanity

sanity — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:26:02 +0000

Stevie-wonder troll, hunting is not a war-like culture. Your broad stroke painting leave a trail of falsehoods and lies that just plain make what you say rediculous.

To equate what you say, is similiar to saying all Muslims are terrorists or all jews are bankers or all Democrats are idiots…..there is only a few not all.

Nice try though. No, not even a nice try.

By: Amy Proctor

Amy Proctor — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:52:10 +0000

I’m trying to figure this out. I’m a very conservative Catholic conservative. I have been called so many utterly disgusting names as a Catholic that I can’t understand the big to do about “raghead”. Maybe I don’t know what it means? Turbin head, right? Why is that bad? I think Ann Coulter speaks like people think, and that’s why there’s a problem in this PC world.

I’m surprised to see people turn against her. I mean, Michelle Malkin said on her site that she refers to extremist muslims as murderers, bastards….. so what’s so wrong with “ragheads”? I must be missing something.

By: steve

steve — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:50:24 +0000

Cheney proves just how warlike and violent the rightwing Christians are. See: Islamo-fascists. Peace

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:15:11 +0000

- Well from the current reports he wasn’t seriously injured thankfully, apparently no serious wounds, but more like having his “feathers ruffled”, so I suppose its permissible to chuckle a bit, particularly when as one TV wag put it, “…The late night shows are certainly going to have a “field day” with this one…”… *Heh*

- Bang

By: Iowa Voice

Iowa Voice — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:10:06 +0000

Ann Coulter Comments

I’ve avoided commenting on this in the last few days for two reasons: First, I wasn’t at the speech, nor have I read it online. Second, I’m not that big a fan of Ann Coulter anyway. Sure, she says some things that are right on the money when it co…

By: benning

benning — Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:36:29 +0000

Bang: Heheheeee! Notice, the victim was a lawyer. Is it legal to laugh at that?

Don’t care, laughing anyway!

ROFL!

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:51:04 +0000

- From the desk of the “Friendly advice man” -

- Try to stay away from hunting trips with the VP….

- Bang

By: damnum absque injuria » Ann “Raghead” Coulter

damnum absque injuria » Ann “Raghead” Coulter — Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:21:05 +0000

[...] What they said. [...]