Comments on: Just how was Al Gore’s US slam in Saudi Arabia funded?

By: Baklava

Baklava — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:04:12 +0000

Cool. We don’t need conservatives who generalize about “Arabs”.

BTW, the sale was from a British company to a UAE company. Bush didn’t sell (inaccurate accusation) and according to him he didn’t even know about the sale. It was approved (as Time Magazine wrote) by “evaluation by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, an inter-agency body that assesses the security implications of foreign acquisitions of major U.S. infrastructure assets”

By: PCD

PCD — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:03:10 +0000

Tamara, You want to explain your reasoning? Bush doesn’t own the ports nor is he receiving any money from the UAE.

Also, Tammy, I don’t believe you were ever a conservative.

By: Tamara

Tamara — Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:54:35 +0000

Forget about Al Gore, President Bush is selling our seaports to the Arabs,
Ex-conservative

By: Lorica

Lorica — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:06:49 +0000

We (the world) May never know how many licks it takes to get the center of a tootsie pop either. Just playin’ with ya J Rob. You do have a point tho. Is OBL faxing Al or is Al faxing OBL??? – Lorica

By: J Rob

J Rob — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:31:12 +0000

This is the chicken-or-the-egg argument:
Are Dems reciting alQueda talking points, or is alQueda reciting Dem talking points?
The worls may never know.

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:49:55 +0000

Lorica – Its Mohammud al-Gore….

- Bang

By: kevin

kevin — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:53:48 +0000

ST, I’ve got your story linked here;

http://amboytimes.blogspot.com/2006/02/al-gore-and-al-quaeda.html

By: steve

steve — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:10:21 +0000

Check out the Carlyle group and the Bush family’s connection to the Royal family of Saudi Arabia, if you’re really interested in who sold the US out. Actually, we’re not interested in the King of SA anyway, because he’s(they) not the threat. The threat comes from the Wahhabists. Peace

By: kevin

kevin — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:57:43 +0000

ST,
nice little expose’ on al-Gore, I’m going to have to link this one

By: benning

benning — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:24:23 +0000

Gore is a reprehensible traitor to truth and liberty.

By: andrew

andrew — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:58:10 +0000

“You accuse people all the time about bring Clintons name into discussions and you are doing the sane thing by metioning Bush when Gore is the subject.”

Who mentioned Bush? I mentioned saudi wealth in general. If that brings up Bush in your head, thats your fault. Not mine.

But If you want, I’d be for a general rule against business with the Saudis.

By: Justin Thibault

Justin Thibault — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:58:34 +0000

Thank God for the Electoral College

By: Jim M

Jim M — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:34:13 +0000

Andrew what does “Petrol-dollars” have to do with Al Gore being paid for his tear down America speech in Saudi Arabia partly paid for by the Bin Laden family. You accuse people all the time about bring Clintons name into discussions and you are doing the sane thing by metioning Bush when Gore is the subject.

By: andrew

andrew — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:01:01 +0000

“And I wonder what all the usual suspects, who routinely charge Bush with “coddling” the Saudis, think about this?”

Everybody gets some petro-dollars.

By: California Conservative

California Conservative — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:54:25 +0000

Al Gore’s Arab Pander: For Money or Ambition?

Just call him “Oily Al”
“Al Gore, the Vice President under President Bill Clinton and the losing 2000 Democratic Party presidential candidate, last Sunday was in Saudi Arabia, bad-mouthing the United States. Was Gore’s motive mone…