<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congressional probe of NSA surveillance may not happen afterall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:59:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: benning</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-79251</link>
		<dc:creator>benning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/#comment-79251</guid>
		<description>If the Dems ever can wrap their heads around the idea that Americans have a loathing for Traitors, they may actually regain some power, if not their sanity.

The taps had to do with suspected terrorists and their sympathizers here. Tap the bas**ards!

Clinton and Carter did it. I&#039;m sure Reagan and Bush the Elder did it. No problem, no story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Dems ever can wrap their heads around the idea that Americans have a loathing for Traitors, they may actually regain some power, if not their sanity.</p>
<p>The taps had to do with suspected terrorists and their sympathizers here. Tap the bas**ards!</p>
<p>Clinton and Carter did it. I&#8217;m sure Reagan and Bush the Elder did it. No problem, no story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-79188</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/#comment-79188</guid>
		<description>The NSA &quot;scandal&quot; will disappear completely as soon as it sinks into the Democrats and their MSM supporter&#039;s heads that it&#039;s a losing proposition for them. Don&#039;t expect it to get any real attention after that until the &#039;06 and &#039;08 elections, when the Republicans will bring it up again as convincing proof that the Democrats aren&#039;t serious about national security, at which point the Dems and their MSM shills, who were so eager to jump all over this when they thought it&#039;d be to their advantage, will wail that bring it up is just a way to question their already doubtful patriotism. 

Feh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NSA &#8220;scandal&#8221; will disappear completely as soon as it sinks into the Democrats and their MSM supporter&#8217;s heads that it&#8217;s a losing proposition for them. Don&#8217;t expect it to get any real attention after that until the &#8216;06 and &#8216;08 elections, when the Republicans will bring it up again as convincing proof that the Democrats aren&#8217;t serious about national security, at which point the Dems and their MSM shills, who were so eager to jump all over this when they thought it&#8217;d be to their advantage, will wail that bring it up is just a way to question their already doubtful patriotism. </p>
<p>Feh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-79107</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/#comment-79107</guid>
		<description>The story today is Cheney and Chertoff. Tomorrow maybe Libby or the doubling of the debt under bush, or why 435,000 people are under surviellance by the NSA. There are so many problems and areas of incompetence that they are difficult to discuss daily.  The NSA scandal is not going away. Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story today is Cheney and Chertoff. Tomorrow maybe Libby or the doubling of the debt under bush, or why 435,000 people are under surviellance by the NSA. There are so many problems and areas of incompetence that they are difficult to discuss daily.  The NSA scandal is not going away. Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-79091</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/#comment-79091</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NSA Investigation May Be Dead In The Water&lt;/strong&gt;

From the Washington Post:

Congress appeared ready to launch an investigation into the Bush administration&#039;s warrantless domestic surveillance program last week, but an all-out White House lobbying campaign has dramatically slowed the effort and may...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NSA Investigation May Be Dead In The Water</strong></p>
<p>From the Washington Post:</p>
<p>Congress appeared ready to launch an investigation into the Bush administration&#8217;s warrantless domestic surveillance program last week, but an all-out White House lobbying campaign has dramatically slowed the effort and may&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-79086</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/02/15/congressional-probe-of-nsa-surveillance-may-not-happen-afterall/#comment-79086</guid>
		<description>Olympia Snowe &lt;em&gt;was among two Republicans and two Democrats who signed a letter expressing &quot;our profound concern about recent revelations that the United States Government may have engaged in &lt;strong&gt;domestic&lt;/strong&gt; electronic surveillance without appropriate legal authority.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

The way I see it is that letter was shown to be factually incorrect. I&#039;m not sure why the letter was written in the first place. Maybe it was due to the way some people (like the media) characterized the program. Whatever the reason, I hope Olymnpia has changed her sources of information so she isn&#039;t duped like this anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympia Snowe <em>was among two Republicans and two Democrats who signed a letter expressing &#8220;our profound concern about recent revelations that the United States Government may have engaged in <strong>domestic</strong> electronic surveillance without appropriate legal authority.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The way I see it is that letter was shown to be factually incorrect. I&#8217;m not sure why the letter was written in the first place. Maybe it was due to the way some people (like the media) characterized the program. Whatever the reason, I hope Olymnpia has changed her sources of information so she isn&#8217;t duped like this anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
