Comments on: Oh please

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 02:02:48 +0000

Moody Blues-In the beginning – Great song steve, check it out! That’ll give you something to do, between classes.

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:55:57 +0000

And what about that Kosmic crap in your Hookah!

By: sanity

sanity — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:44:37 +0000

Hmmm? Thats all? Bras?

How about flags?

How about slashing tires?

How about throwing blood all over offices?

How about defacing public and private property?

How about assualting individuals with things like pies?

How about burning effigies of the President?

Ah lets not forget those nice Molotov cocktail that get thrown also.

Let me help you in refreshing your memory:
Zombie Time

Only thing burned by Liberals is a Bra? That is an easily debunked lie.

Next?

By: Baklava

Baklava — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:22:19 +0000

See where this gets us? No where. How about talking solutions and then addressing what the results would be of said solutions (which you never do)?

By: Baklava

Baklava — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:21:20 +0000

and hundreds of oil wells (ala Saddam who is big government – which is to the left of center)

and houses in Maryland….

and SUV’s….

By: Baklava

Baklava — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:18:36 +0000

and flags…

By: steve

steve — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:16:37 +0000

The only thing that the Left has ever burned were bra’s. Peace

By: Lorica

Lorica — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 21:21:41 +0000

Since we have the broad brush out. Steve you liberals burn our churches. In fact I bet it is 100 to 1 church burnings to abortion clinic bombings. You hypocrite, why don’t you talk about that ever. – Lorica

By: steve

steve — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:59:01 +0000

Christians blow up abortion clinics and kill people, however. That is hypocrisy as well. So is putting people to death in the death chamber and dropping bombs on women and children. Look to the log in your own eye. Peace

By: Francis W. Porretto

Francis W. Porretto — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:35:04 +0000

“On the other hand” he continued, “we feel we can quite adequately convey the nature of the cartoons by describing them.”

However, “describing them” did not seem to be adequate in the case of Chris Ofili’s dung-encrusted Virgin Mary, which the Times felt compelled to reproduce graphically only a few days ago. Christians, we are all aware, don’t riot or issue fatwas over such things.

Hypocrisy, thy name is the New York Times…and Manhattan liberalism in general.

By: Dave in CO

Dave in CO — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 05:04:35 +0000

steve, by now you know that the UAE isn’t buying any ports. Why do you insist on spewing false statements? I’m less concerned about UAE reps running some terminals at US ports than I am the Doncs that people like you keep electing.

Anyone else catch Hildebeast on CNN STILL claiming that we are selling the ports? Is it possible for a Dem to see a TV camera and mic and NOT lie? Rhetorical question. We all know the answer. Peas and carrots

By: steve

steve — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 02:34:25 +0000

So, John, what do you think of the UAE buying our ports? And given the fact that the UAE doesn’t recognize Israel’s right to exist should we be doing business with them? What about Hamas? The Republicans seem to be getting bogged down with double standards. Peace

By: John Ewan

John Ewan — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:35:07 +0000

The thing that seems lost now is that the Danish Imams also faked three images that were definitely blasphemous and they should be punished under sharia law. No one is taking them to task for their blasphemy, but rioting against the cartoonists.

It needs to be remembered that there is no lie, no outrage, nothing that is not proper to commit against an infidel if it helps to bring about Islamic sovreignty. The Times is just getting its dhimmitude on early.

By: Mwalimu Daudi

Mwalimu Daudi — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:21:12 +0000

The New York Times - a mighty tower of Jell-O. You all realize that once the new democratic government in Iraq drives out the terrorists, the Times will try to swoop in and take all the credit. You think I exaggerate? Heck - they did it after the Cold War, which the Times tried their darndest to win for the Soviet Union. It's hard to respect a newspaper that bested Pravda in pro-Communist bloviating. Once the Berlin Wall came down, the Times tried to make it sound like they - and they alone - took on the Evil Empire and won single-handedly. They will do it again in Iraq.

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:02:51 +0000

I can imagine that should the head nit at NYT be compelled to face its disease and seeks out a local support group, the intro might proceed as follows. Mr. Keller walks into a room full of people and introduces himself. Hi I’m not sure if we’re in the right place but today my name is Mr. Keller. Hi Mr. Keller, Willy Nilly, lefty, dhimmi, out to lunch, steve, mark, actus, ……

No offense intended for those who’s name appears above, and who’s lifestyle is not befitting of similar psychosis as the NYT’s.