Cross Posted From: Stop The ACLU Ian at Expose the Left has the video Via NY Times Senator Russell D. Feingold said Sunday that he would introduce a measure in the Senate to censure President Bush over the domestic…

- On another note. Al Sadr, the firebrand cleric finally came out today, after yesterdays attacks on civilians, and blamed said attacks on al Qaeda, which is a new one for him. He also urged calm on the part of his militia, although four men were discovered hung from some power line towers by Iraqi police.

- Officials say the men had explosives strapped to their bodies, and two had granade launchers. The police believe the men may have been al Qaeda, since two were from Syria, and said they think they were killed by Al Sadr’s men. If the various Iraqi groups begin to hunt down and dispatch al Qaeda insurgents, the whole situation on the ground could change in a hurry.

- Bang

Do you think you can figure out why your party doesn’t vote the way you want them to? It’s because your position is not attractive Steve. And not based on truth.

  Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold (d) is calling for a censure of President Bush over the NSA Wiretaps.  The Lefties are delighting in the prospect of this proposal. Jay at Stop The ACLU has a better idea: censure Feingold:I think this…

Yep. I’ve heard them. One inaccurate accusation after another. I feel like a broken record .

- Problem is its not the “nuanced” approach the Dems have been trying to achieve, tip-toeing through the backlash landmines that they can step on, and end up looking even weaker on the WOT.

The Dems feel they made some political hay on the UAE port dustup, and Feingolds manuevers could offset that quickly, and even worse put some of the hopefuls like Hillery in a bad situation. If she backs him with this idiocy, and it peoves unpopular with the electorate, she gets hurt, ect.

- Reids comments, the usual “we all need to be assured blah blah blah”, but not supporting Feingolds move may be some more visability into the ongoing fight between the Deaniacs and Clintonista’s within the party.

- McCauliffe was just on FOX, and watching him you see the problem the Dems have in a nutshell. The gal interviewing him asked four times what the Dems plan was and each time he repeated the same meme’s about Bush, you’ve heard them all before.

- The Dem message continues to be, threaten the Iraqui’s and if they don’t get it together pull out all the troops now. No idea of what to do when and if we did that and al Qaeda/Iran/Syria responded by over-running the country with masses of Insurgent incursions and doing everything they could without us there to instigate all out civil war. Then the country would be right in the hands of Iran and the Jihadists, and still the Dems have no alternatives, other than “Bush bad”.

- Lets see. the Dems in the past three years have:

- Called for an announced time table, to be sure the mad Mullahs would know exactly how long they had to wait to move in.

- Called for an immediate pullout, leaving the whole situation to collapse, and making all the gains we’ve made useless.

- Called for threats followed by withdrawal, again leaving a mess with absolutely no alternatives, so somewhere down the line we’ll get to do it all over again at even higher cost in money and lives.

- The Dems don’t have a clue. Turn the operation of things over to people with no plan and these sort of ideas? Only if we’re as crazy as they are.

- Bang

Mah fellow progressives, now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of the party. I don’t know about you, but I have had it with the D.C. Democrats, had it with the DLC Democrats, had it with every calculating, equivocating, triangulating, straddling, hair-splitting son of a bitch up there, and that includes Hillary Rodham Clinton.

I will not be supporting Senator Clinton because: a) she has no clear stand on the war and b) Terri Schiavo and flag-burning are not issues where you reach out to the other side and try to split the difference. You want to talk about lowering abortion rates through cooperation on sex education and contraception, fine, but don’t jack with stuff that is pure rightwing firewater.

I can’t see a damn soul in D.C. except Russ Feingold who is even worth considering for President. The rest of them seem to me so poisonously in hock to this system of legalized bribery they can’t even see straight.

Here here Molly! GOod luck with that one! I’d be happy to see the Democrats nominate Russ. Prepare for a trouncing…

If you’re a Democratic hopeful for 2008, do you want to come out censuring the President for an action that he took with the advice of his legal advisers and which he informed Senate leaders about? An action that a great many people throughout the country support? Most Americans don’t seem to upset at the idea of listening in on conversations between someone in this country that is communicating with an Al Qaeda operative outside the country. And, from what this lay person has gathered from reading about it, the legal opinion is not as clearcut that this is a “high crime and misdemeanor” as Feingold would have us believe. In 2002, the special review court for FISA said in its opinion in In Re Sealed Case No. 02-001,

The Truong court, as did all the other courts to have decided the issue, held that the President did have inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches to obtain foreign intelligence information.

Bold emphasis is mine..

Then later in your post you talk about poor marketing.

I know you are new to politics and let me suggest to you that you the sources of information you are reading are the sources or information marketing that HAD YOU BELIEVING that Bush or NSA was violating the constitution. The problem is that the Democrats/liberals have a serious problem with inaccurate accusations and false allegations.

It’s up to you Raj on who you want to believe. The liberal/Democrat marketing plan which continues to mischaracterize conservatives or people who are more interested in ideas/solutions/facts/common sense. I’m generalizing here of course. And Republicans aren’t but 50% conservative so it’s hard to try to sway you on anything with regards to party affiliation.

But when you go around talking about someone violating the constitution you are either a constitutional expert or repeating what you’ve heard.

Another commont trait of liberals is to do like the 8:11 poster Tommy and in every post offer a laundry list of accusations. It’s like a machine gun style approach to debating but only shows one thing and that is that Tommy hates Bush and can’t stick to the topic at hand. There is never any real engaging debate with Tommy. If you try to focus and discuss an issue it is impossible.

There are good articles out there. I’ve linked to them in past discussions here at ST’s. ST conveniently posted her past posts above so you can easily browse through them to see some of these articles.

It’s up to you. You can take the lazy way out and continue with misinformation or do the due diligence.

I’ll wait and see.

Via NY Times
Senator Russell D. Feingold said Sunday that he would introduce a measure in the Senate to censure President Bush over the domestic eavesdropping program.
“What the president did by consciously and intentionally violating the C…