Comments on: The consequences of losing in Iraq http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/ Don't dis or dismiss this miss! Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:28:30 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: steve http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-96050 steve Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:11:36 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-96050 I love the Jews, don't like Zionists much though. They so easily slide from Zionist to Jews to Israel to anti-semite, like those are all the same persons and things. No differentiation between Ashkenazi or Arab-semite. But, thats why the Zionists have been able to convience themselves that Palestine is really Israel. Or that black is white. They are morally bankrupt. Peace I love the Jews, don’t like Zionists much though. They so easily slide from Zionist to Jews to Israel to anti-semite, like those are all the same persons and things. No differentiation between Ashkenazi or Arab-semite. But, thats why the Zionists have been able to convience themselves that Palestine is really Israel. Or that black is white. They are morally bankrupt. Peace

]]> By: Severian http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95871 Severian Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:21:26 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95871 Yeah, damn those evil Joooos. They believe in hard work, education, family, saving money, all those evil disruptive things like that! Why, they move into an area, and pretty soon, people are wondering why they do so well! Can't be the hard work and education thing, or that we're stupid and lazy, must be something evil they're doing, the bastages! We hate anyone that makes us look bad! The Joooos left the noble Palestinians fully functional greenhouses that could be used to make tons of money growing vegetables and flowers, and then they forced the Palestinians to destroy them, evil I tell you, just evil!:-@ Yeah, damn those evil Joooos. They believe in hard work, education, family, saving money, all those evil disruptive things like that! Why, they move into an area, and pretty soon, people are wondering why they do so well! Can’t be the hard work and education thing, or that we’re stupid and lazy, must be something evil they’re doing, the bastages! We hate anyone that makes us look bad!

The Joooos left the noble Palestinians fully functional greenhouses that could be used to make tons of money growing vegetables and flowers, and then they forced the Palestinians to destroy them, evil I tell you, just evil!:-@

]]> By: Jim M http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95839 Jim M Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:33:56 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95839 NC Cop, no Steve(FN) won't wait until next week just give him a few minutes he'll spout something so unquestionably stupid it will amaze everyone. =)) NC Cop, no Steve(FN) won’t wait until next week just give him a few minutes he’ll spout something so unquestionably stupid it will amaze everyone.
=))

]]> By: NC Cop http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95554 NC Cop Fri, 24 Mar 2006 03:08:33 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95554 Hmmmmmm, what are you trying to say steve? That they deserved it? Your anti-Semitism is absolutely astounding. Hey, wanna claim that the holocaust was a fraud?! Maybe you'll save that for next week. Hmmmmmm, what are you trying to say steve? That they deserved it? Your anti-Semitism is absolutely astounding. Hey, wanna claim that the holocaust was a fraud?! Maybe you’ll save that for next week.

]]> By: steve http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95531 steve Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:30:52 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95531 Why does everyone dislike the Jews? Always being scattered and chased off? Peace Why does everyone dislike the Jews? Always being scattered and chased off? Peace

]]> By: PCD http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95489 PCD Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:43:56 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95489 steve(FN), why do you hate Israel so that you can't even get your facts straight? There were Askenazi and Shepardic Jews in the land that is Israel for all recorded history. The Arabs only occupied Israel after Rome and then the Ottoman Empire scattered the Jews. steve(FN), why do you hate Israel so that you can’t even get your facts straight? There were Askenazi and Shepardic Jews in the land that is Israel for all recorded history. The Arabs only occupied Israel after Rome and then the Ottoman Empire scattered the Jews.

]]> By: Jim M http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95326 Jim M Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:50:23 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95326 Found this on the <a href="http://www.pulse24.com/News/Top_Story/20060323-005/page.asp" rel="nofollow">Drudge Report</a> if this doesn't take the cake these peaceniks (moonbats) were freed by coalition forces and their families said they were freed no mention of the US and British solders on a raid the freed them. They can't even acknowledge that our troops freed them they make it sound as if the terrorist let them go so give them back to the terrorist the ungrateful idiots!:-w Found this on the Drudge Report if this doesn’t take the cake these peaceniks (moonbats) were freed by coalition forces and their families said they were freed no mention of the US and British solders on a raid the freed them. They can’t even acknowledge that our troops freed them they make it sound as if the terrorist let them go so give them back to the terrorist the ungrateful idiots!:-w

]]> By: Jim M http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95295 Jim M Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:36:18 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95295 There are people (Liberals) that could trip over WMD's and dead bodies and you could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Saddam was responsible, they still would say what WMD's and Bush is to blame for the dead. Their hatred for Bush is such that they are blinded and refuse to digest any facts or information that would shake their beliefs. These people believe there isn't any reason at all for War even when diplomacy has completely broken down. These same people would give up their freedoms and everyone elses wringing the hands and saying we just need to understand these people more as those same people goose step right over us. :-w There are people (Liberals) that could trip over WMD’s and dead bodies and you could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Saddam was responsible, they still would say what WMD’s and Bush is to blame for the dead. Their hatred for Bush is such that they are blinded and refuse to digest any facts or information that would shake their beliefs. These people believe there isn’t any reason at all for War even when diplomacy has completely broken down. These same people would give up their freedoms and everyone elses wringing the hands and saying we just need to understand these people more as those same people goose step right over us.
:-w

]]> By: CavalierX http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95050 CavalierX Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:48:50 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95050 In fact, I'll save you the trouble. Follow <a href="http://www.hrw.org/reports/1993/iraqanfal/" rel="nofollow">this link</a> to learn something of the Anfal campaign. In fact, I’ll save you the trouble. Follow this link to learn something of the Anfal campaign.

]]> By: CavalierX http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95045 CavalierX Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:46:19 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95045 >That would certainly would have been >true, had Saddam actually HAD any. I invite you to open the serch engine of your choice and type one word: Halabja. The dead are, oddly, far more eloquent than the living. >That would certainly would have been
>true, had Saddam actually HAD any.

I invite you to open the serch engine of your choice and type one word: Halabja. The dead are, oddly, far more eloquent than the living.

]]> By: CavalierX http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-95038 CavalierX Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:44:32 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-95038 >The reason Saddam thought the USA >wouldn't topple him was because he was a >CIA man. Right. Cause the CIA has a habit of toppling pro-western governments to install pro-Soviet fascist dictatorships. Seen "Syriana" one too many times, have you? The reason Saddam believed he was safe was his <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/MiddleEast/wm217.cfm" rel="nofollow">oil field exploitation deals</a> with France, Russia and China. He <i>bought</i> their Security Council votes, secure in the belief that the US was too weak to act without UN approval. Like you, he was a fool. >The reason Saddam thought the USA
>wouldn’t topple him was because he was a
>CIA man.

Right. Cause the CIA has a habit of toppling pro-western governments to install pro-Soviet fascist dictatorships. Seen “Syriana” one too many times, have you? The reason Saddam believed he was safe was his oil field exploitation deals with France, Russia and China. He bought their Security Council votes, secure in the belief that the US was too weak to act without UN approval. Like you, he was a fool.

]]> By: steve http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-94971 steve Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:37:25 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-94971 The reason Saddam thought the USA wouldn't topple him was because he was a CIA man. Then came bush, knowing nothing about foreign policy and listening to the Zionists, the Armageddonists and the neo-cons who all wanted a war in Iraq for their own reasons. And now, what a mess we have. The land that Israel sits on with all of it's Ashkenazi Zionists, is Arab land. Just because the United Nations gave it to the Zionists doesn't make it theirs. It is still Arab land. Peace The reason Saddam thought the USA wouldn’t topple him was because he was a CIA man. Then came bush, knowing nothing about foreign policy and listening to the Zionists, the Armageddonists and the neo-cons who all wanted a war in Iraq for their own reasons. And now, what a mess we have. The land that Israel sits on with all of it’s Ashkenazi Zionists, is Arab land. Just because the United Nations gave it to the Zionists doesn’t make it theirs. It is still Arab land. Peace

]]> By: Sisyphus http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-94969 Sisyphus Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:11:04 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-94969 "The U.S. would lose all credibility on weapons proliferation. One doesn't have to be a dreamy-eyed optimist about democracy to recognize that toppling Saddam Hussein was a milestone in slowing the spread of WMD." Please. That would certainly would have been true, had Saddam actually HAD any. And Bush is risking whatever credibility he still has on weapons proliferation with the recent changes in policy towards India (although I heartily approve of his cultivation of India). “The U.S. would lose all credibility on weapons proliferation. One doesn’t have to be a dreamy-eyed optimist about democracy to recognize that toppling Saddam Hussein was a milestone in slowing the spread of WMD.”

Please. That would certainly would have been true, had Saddam actually HAD any. And Bush is risking whatever credibility he still has on weapons proliferation with the recent changes in policy towards India (although I heartily approve of his cultivation of India).

]]> By: Baklava http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-94966 Baklava Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:04:59 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-94966 Good Lord what a powerful piece. You have quite the talent ST for finding people making overwhelmingly compelling arguments. And right on MikeW. Rewarding terrorists will only breed more terrorism. You can bank on that. If you want to try an expirement Steve, you can reward the first criminal you see and see how far it gets you with your theories. Establish full relations with your nearest burglar/murderer/snake Good Lord what a powerful piece. You have quite the talent ST for finding people making overwhelmingly compelling arguments.

And right on MikeW. Rewarding terrorists will only breed more terrorism. You can bank on that.

If you want to try an expirement Steve, you can reward the first criminal you see and see how far it gets you with your theories. Establish full relations with your nearest burglar/murderer/snake

]]> By: MIkeW http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-94871 MIkeW Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:04:27 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/22/the-consequences-of-losing-in-iraq/#comment-94871 Steve, I don't understand where you're coming from about the President's policy having already failed. From what I can glean from the evidence, there are two more countries in this world that aren't oppressed by dictators and or thoroughly repressive regimes. That is a consequence of that policy. Yes, both countries are in the infancy stage, but the issues they are working through (and struggling) sure as heck don't signify policy failure, nor do they signify failure on the part of the fledgling governments. As to your comment about Israel giving up the land in question, you couldn't be more wrong about what it would do to Hezbollah. Having lived and worked in that area of the world, I can tell you that the one overly important trait that Arabs understand is strength. It commands attention and respect. One has to look at the recent documents released concerning Iraq and Hussein. He pressed on with his "supposed" charade of having WMD (I still believe he did have them and programs to continue production), because he believed that the US (due to recent lack of reaction/response and other recent history of a lack of staying power as a result of negative popular support at home) would not commit to action. That is one of the main reasons (if not THE main reason) he thumbed his nose at the sanctions and the UN resolutions: he felt that the UN and member states would not call him on the issues. Therefore, Israel's return of these lands would give Hezbollah exactly what they want - a reason to tell the rest of the Arab and Muslim world that Israel capitulated to their demands and is a weakling in their eyes. If all of these factions felt enough strength to take on Israel, they would do so. They know that Israel is stronger than they are and won't directly engage them, because to lose to Israel would prove fatal in the world of both public and political opinion. Steve,
I don’t understand where you’re coming from about the President’s policy having already failed. From what I can glean from the evidence, there are two more countries in this world that aren’t oppressed by dictators and or thoroughly repressive regimes. That is a consequence of that policy. Yes, both countries are in the infancy stage, but the issues they are working through (and struggling) sure as heck don’t signify policy failure, nor do they signify failure on the part of the fledgling governments. As to your comment about Israel giving up the land in question, you couldn’t be more wrong about what it would do to Hezbollah. Having lived and worked in that area of the world, I can tell you that the one overly important trait that Arabs understand is strength. It commands attention and respect. One has to look at the recent documents released concerning Iraq and Hussein. He pressed on with his “supposed” charade of having WMD (I still believe he did have them and programs to continue production), because he believed that the US (due to recent lack of reaction/response and other recent history of a lack of staying power as a result of negative popular support at home) would not commit to action. That is one of the main reasons (if not THE main reason) he thumbed his nose at the sanctions and the UN resolutions: he felt that the UN and member states would not call him on the issues.
Therefore, Israel’s return of these lands would give Hezbollah exactly what they want – a reason to tell the rest of the Arab and Muslim world that Israel capitulated to their demands and is a weakling in their eyes. If all of these factions felt enough strength to take on Israel, they would do so. They know that Israel is stronger than they are and won’t directly engage them, because to lose to Israel would prove fatal in the world of both public and political opinion.

]]>