<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on the &#8216;whiny conservatives survey&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-96432</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-96432</guid>
		<description>=))  Steve You are the one who needs to read the Constitution.  Here is the Preamble:

&lt;em&gt;WE, the PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, &lt;strong&gt;promote the general welfare&lt;/strong&gt;, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.&lt;/em&gt; 

It says promote the general welfare, not create a granny state that will take care of you from cradle to grave.  =))  You should know that the Founding Fathers did not have a welfare state in mind, if they did then why didn&#039;t they create it 200 years earlier??   - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' />  Steve You are the one who needs to read the Constitution.  Here is the Preamble:</p>
<p><em>WE, the PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, <strong>promote the general welfare</strong>, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.</em> </p>
<p>It says promote the general welfare, not create a granny state that will take care of you from cradle to grave.  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' />  You should know that the Founding Fathers did not have a welfare state in mind, if they did then why didn&#8217;t they create it 200 years earlier??   &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-96379</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-96379</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s referred to as the &quot;general welfare&quot; in the Constitution. It&#039;s in the Preamble. You know all of you Rightwingers should actually read the Constitution and not just pretend you know what&#039;s in it. Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s referred to as the &#8220;general welfare&#8221; in the Constitution. It&#8217;s in the Preamble. You know all of you Rightwingers should actually read the Constitution and not just pretend you know what&#8217;s in it. Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim M</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-96149</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-96149</guid>
		<description>My God Sanity if they cut those give away programs Steve(FN) would be put out of the nut house and on the street again could you imagine?  Walking around with not one logical thought,  OOHHhh wait he is doing that now sorry things would not change.  Just think how the economy in this country would grow if we could reduce the Imperial Federal Governments budget by 55% which is what we give away every year to leaches.  I still challenge any liberal to show me in the United States Constitution where our government has the right to take money that I have earned (At the point of a gun) and give it to someone that will not work.  Besides eminent domain the welfare programs are one of my pet peeves both are a travesty and the American public just sits and takes it except for a few of us.  Liberals like Steve think this country is great because of the Government I believe this country is great because of individuals contributions the people of this country.  Even thought JFK had his faults I will always remember: &quot;Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country&quot;.
**==</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My God Sanity if they cut those give away programs Steve(FN) would be put out of the nut house and on the street again could you imagine?  Walking around with not one logical thought,  OOHHhh wait he is doing that now sorry things would not change.  Just think how the economy in this country would grow if we could reduce the Imperial Federal Governments budget by 55% which is what we give away every year to leaches.  I still challenge any liberal to show me in the United States Constitution where our government has the right to take money that I have earned (At the point of a gun) and give it to someone that will not work.  Besides eminent domain the welfare programs are one of my pet peeves both are a travesty and the American public just sits and takes it except for a few of us.  Liberals like Steve think this country is great because of the Government I believe this country is great because of individuals contributions the people of this country.  Even thought JFK had his faults I will always remember: &#8220;Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country&#8221;.<br />
<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_flag.gif' alt='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' class='wp-smiley' width='25' height='18' title='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-96061</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-96061</guid>
		<description>and so should all the give outs that teh Democrats support.

It is not up to the Government to take care of you, it is for hte Government ot Protect you, but not to take care of you.

So you better cut all these programs first before you cut the budget for protecting americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and so should all the give outs that teh Democrats support.</p>
<p>It is not up to the Government to take care of you, it is for hte Government ot Protect you, but not to take care of you.</p>
<p>So you better cut all these programs first before you cut the budget for protecting americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-96045</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-96045</guid>
		<description>sanity, and here is another: The Defense Budget should be cut by $225 billion in 2007. Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sanity, and here is another: The Defense Budget should be cut by $225 billion in 2007. Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-96032</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-96032</guid>
		<description>Remember Jim, they Always have your back, just look here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacredcowburgers.com/parodies/got_your_back.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;We got your back troops!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember Jim, they Always have your back, just look here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sacredcowburgers.com/parodies/got_your_back.jpg" rel="nofollow">We got your back troops!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim M</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-95890</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-95890</guid>
		<description>If you can&#039;t dazzle them with brilliance baffle them with &lt;strong&gt;B&lt;/strong&gt;arbra &lt;strong&gt;S&lt;/strong&gt;treisand.
:d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can&#8217;t dazzle them with brilliance baffle them with <strong>B</strong>arbra <strong>S</strong>treisand.<br />
<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_bigsmile.gif' alt='&#58;&#100;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#100;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-95886</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-95886</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, the left seems a bit whiny in themselves.

I followed a link back from someone who visited my blog on the saddam paper release and found they had used a link back to my post on the ABC story, and instead of actually discussing information of the release, they instead wnat to attack bloggers who comment on it. Talk about head in the sand.

If you want check it out &lt;a href=&quot;http://65.18.181.62/discus/messages/1/11790.html?1143222858&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;

Looks to be mainly a Left leaning area, like I posted on there, like hitting a ball up against a brickwall. I think the analogy was lost on some lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, the left seems a bit whiny in themselves.</p>
<p>I followed a link back from someone who visited my blog on the saddam paper release and found they had used a link back to my post on the ABC story, and instead of actually discussing information of the release, they instead wnat to attack bloggers who comment on it. Talk about head in the sand.</p>
<p>If you want check it out <a href="http://65.18.181.62/discus/messages/1/11790.html?1143222858" rel="nofollow">Here</a></p>
<p>Looks to be mainly a Left leaning area, like I posted on there, like hitting a ball up against a brickwall. I think the analogy was lost on some lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NC Cop</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-95878</link>
		<dc:creator>NC Cop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-95878</guid>
		<description>&quot;I was able to divine all these deep sociological insights by basically just bullshitting. There was no right or wrong, but it had to sound pretentious and serious.&quot;

Sounds like my four years in college!!!  I was a political science major, ya know!:d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I was able to divine all these deep sociological insights by basically just bullshitting. There was no right or wrong, but it had to sound pretentious and serious.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like my four years in college!!!  I was a political science major, ya know!<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_bigsmile.gif' alt='&#58;&#100;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#100;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-95870</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-95870</guid>
		<description>This is one of the prime reasons I have little to no respect for the &quot;soft&quot; sciences like psychology and sociology. Fuzzy thinking presented as if it were rigorous research. Subjective standards presented like they were hard and fast, provable quantification of facts.

When I was in college, I was dating a sociology major, who was minoring in psych. I remember one evening in her dorm room, she was working on some homework, and just couldn&#039;t make progress. She was burned out, too many classes, too little relaxation, she was way overloaded. I obviously wanted to get her finished so we could go out. She had to read 6 different articles and write up the sociological significance of each one. She&#039;d completed reading and writing a one or two paragraph article summary. I asked her if she wanted help. After her insulting me by saying physics majors only know how to stick numbers in equations (no dear, that&#039;s the engineers, the physicists use mathematics as the language of natural philosophy, we&#039;re taught how to think), she finally said why not, she was not going to be able to do it. So, I sat there, read her summaries, and dictated to her what to write. She turned them in, and got 4 excellents and 2 very goods on her papers, the highest she&#039;d ever gotten. She wouldn&#039;t speak to me for days. :d

I was able to divine all these deep sociological insights by basically just bullshitting. There was no right or wrong, but it had to sound pretentious and serious. Lost what little respect I had for sociology completely that day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the prime reasons I have little to no respect for the &#8220;soft&#8221; sciences like psychology and sociology. Fuzzy thinking presented as if it were rigorous research. Subjective standards presented like they were hard and fast, provable quantification of facts.</p>
<p>When I was in college, I was dating a sociology major, who was minoring in psych. I remember one evening in her dorm room, she was working on some homework, and just couldn&#8217;t make progress. She was burned out, too many classes, too little relaxation, she was way overloaded. I obviously wanted to get her finished so we could go out. She had to read 6 different articles and write up the sociological significance of each one. She&#8217;d completed reading and writing a one or two paragraph article summary. I asked her if she wanted help. After her insulting me by saying physics majors only know how to stick numbers in equations (no dear, that&#8217;s the engineers, the physicists use mathematics as the language of natural philosophy, we&#8217;re taught how to think), she finally said why not, she was not going to be able to do it. So, I sat there, read her summaries, and dictated to her what to write. She turned them in, and got 4 excellents and 2 very goods on her papers, the highest she&#8217;d ever gotten. She wouldn&#8217;t speak to me for days. <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_bigsmile.gif' alt='&#58;&#100;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#100;' /></p>
<p>I was able to divine all these deep sociological insights by basically just bullshitting. There was no right or wrong, but it had to sound pretentious and serious. Lost what little respect I had for sociology completely that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim M</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-95837</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-95837</guid>
		<description>Once again a study by Liberals is found to be a fallacy and all funded by our tax dollars and after all that wasted time and money we find out that liberals are still whinny. 
=))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again a study by Liberals is found to be a fallacy and all funded by our tax dollars and after all that wasted time and money we find out that liberals are still whinny.<br />
<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camojack</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-95549</link>
		<dc:creator>camojack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 02:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-95549</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t &quot;whiny conservatives&quot; an &lt;em&gt;oxymoron&lt;/em&gt;, anyway? :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t &#8220;whiny conservatives&#8221; an <em>oxymoron</em>, anyway? <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_laughloud.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-95544</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 02:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-95544</guid>
		<description>Survey Says????  Yes who knew all this time that Richard Dawson and the Family Feud was doing studies that equaled what is going on at UC Berkley.  I know Richard would be proud. :) - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Survey Says????  Yes who knew all this time that Richard Dawson and the Family Feud was doing studies that equaled what is going on at UC Berkley.  I know Richard would be proud. <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_smiley.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;' /> &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Tory</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-95540</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-95540</guid>
		<description>What &quot;scoop&quot;? This was right in the news article that I read the other week about this highly questionable study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8220;scoop&#8221;? This was right in the news article that I read the other week about this highly questionable study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stingray</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-95530</link>
		<dc:creator>Stingray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/23/update-on-the-whiny-conservatives-survey/#comment-95530</guid>
		<description>Michelle kindly posted the actual report on whiny kids grow up to be conservatives to her site last night. I read through every bit of it (it&#039;s social science garbage) and the bit that stuck out the most was that it described conservative boys are &quot;&lt;strong&gt;visibly deviant&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot;

&lt;strong&gt;Visibly deviant&lt;/strong&gt;? What the hell does that mean, especially in a place like Berkeley?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcculloughsite.net/stingray/2006/03/block_report_conservative_boys_are_visibly_deviant.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s my post on the subject&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcculloughsite.net/stingray/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stingray:  a blog for salty Christians&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle kindly posted the actual report on whiny kids grow up to be conservatives to her site last night. I read through every bit of it (it&#8217;s social science garbage) and the bit that stuck out the most was that it described conservative boys are &#8220;<strong>visibly deviant</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Visibly deviant</strong>? What the hell does that mean, especially in a place like Berkeley?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mcculloughsite.net/stingray/2006/03/block_report_conservative_boys_are_visibly_deviant.php" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s my post on the subject</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mcculloughsite.net/stingray/" rel="nofollow">Stingray:  a blog for salty Christians</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
