<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The war on Rummy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pirate's Cove</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-107656</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate's Cove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-107656</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WTW: Rummy&#8217;s All Good&lt;/strong&gt;


Good to see that W is a stand up guy, unlike others:
WASHINGTON (CNN) &#8212; President Bush sharply defended Donald Rumsfeld on Tuesday, saying the embattled Pentagon chief is doing a &#8220;fine job&#8221; despite calls for his resignation from six ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WTW: Rummy&#8217;s All Good</strong></p>
<p>Good to see that W is a stand up guy, unlike others:<br />
WASHINGTON (CNN) &#8212; President Bush sharply defended Donald Rumsfeld on Tuesday, saying the embattled Pentagon chief is doing a &#8220;fine job&#8221; despite calls for his resignation from six &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106620</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106620</guid>
		<description>&quot;The only thing I like Jimmy Carter about was the fact that he was the guy who really saw stealth technology as the way of the future and he made sure it was funded.&quot;

Knowing what I do about peanuthead, that had to be an accident. Either that, or he thought it would never work and would drain funds from more relevant weapon systems. He sabotaged the development of nuclear penetrators, and the enhanced radiation weapon, both of which would be quite nice to have to drop from our shiny new stealth aircraft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The only thing I like Jimmy Carter about was the fact that he was the guy who really saw stealth technology as the way of the future and he made sure it was funded.&#8221;</p>
<p>Knowing what I do about peanuthead, that had to be an accident. Either that, or he thought it would never work and would drain funds from more relevant weapon systems. He sabotaged the development of nuclear penetrators, and the enhanced radiation weapon, both of which would be quite nice to have to drop from our shiny new stealth aircraft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106613</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106613</guid>
		<description>I think if they were concerned about the military they would of complained the whole time the Clinton Administration was destroying it.  Steve where were you when the rangers were being killed in Somalia???  Where were these generals???  Did we hear about them complaining then???  Did you know that when Clinton was handing the CMH to one of the fathers whos son was killed in the Somalia debacle that father refused to shake his hand and told him he was unworthy to be Commander and Chief of his son???  No Steve you didn&#039;t know these things and you don&#039;t really care.  Clinton was your buddy, you switched to wearing boxers because you wanted to be just like him.  How about the illegal war in Kosovo??  Where do you stand on the illegal occupation of that country??  Where do you stand on the fact that the KLA still has not disarmed and is spreading islamic disent thru out the balkans???  Steve I am sorry but you are too uninformed for your opinion to really matter much at all.  When someone on your side can tell me what threat Slobo was to America, I might listen to you more.  But You are just stuck on stupid.  Thank you for your input, but you are just wrong, like always. - Lorica 

I agree with you Severian.  Rummy has stood up to alot of &quot;waste&quot; in the military.  I bring up the Paladin weapons system only as a point of referance.  I agree with Rummy&#039;s decision to get rid of it.  We have tons of self propelled artilery.  In 2000 our base was asked to store and maintain 36 of these bad boys.  They are cool to see moving around the base, but it was obvious that we have more than we need, so why continue to make more.  Rummy made the right decision.  Also there are some new ideas coming out in High engery laser systems, and sound also has become more important.  We shall see what happens.  The only thing I like Jimmy Carter about was the fact that he was the guy who really saw stealth technology as the way of the future and he made sure it was funded.  Now look at where we are with that.  The F22 Raptor I hear is pure heaven to fly.  - Lorica (again) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if they were concerned about the military they would of complained the whole time the Clinton Administration was destroying it.  Steve where were you when the rangers were being killed in Somalia???  Where were these generals???  Did we hear about them complaining then???  Did you know that when Clinton was handing the CMH to one of the fathers whos son was killed in the Somalia debacle that father refused to shake his hand and told him he was unworthy to be Commander and Chief of his son???  No Steve you didn&#8217;t know these things and you don&#8217;t really care.  Clinton was your buddy, you switched to wearing boxers because you wanted to be just like him.  How about the illegal war in Kosovo??  Where do you stand on the illegal occupation of that country??  Where do you stand on the fact that the KLA still has not disarmed and is spreading islamic disent thru out the balkans???  Steve I am sorry but you are too uninformed for your opinion to really matter much at all.  When someone on your side can tell me what threat Slobo was to America, I might listen to you more.  But You are just stuck on stupid.  Thank you for your input, but you are just wrong, like always. &#8211; Lorica </p>
<p>I agree with you Severian.  Rummy has stood up to alot of &#8220;waste&#8221; in the military.  I bring up the Paladin weapons system only as a point of referance.  I agree with Rummy&#8217;s decision to get rid of it.  We have tons of self propelled artilery.  In 2000 our base was asked to store and maintain 36 of these bad boys.  They are cool to see moving around the base, but it was obvious that we have more than we need, so why continue to make more.  Rummy made the right decision.  Also there are some new ideas coming out in High engery laser systems, and sound also has become more important.  We shall see what happens.  The only thing I like Jimmy Carter about was the fact that he was the guy who really saw stealth technology as the way of the future and he made sure it was funded.  Now look at where we are with that.  The F22 Raptor I hear is pure heaven to fly.  &#8211; Lorica (again) <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_smiley.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bang Hunter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106395</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bang Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 02:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106395</guid>
		<description>- Actually good old Steve(fn) has sucked you into another strawman phoney debate. The main premise behind the lefts loud endless screeching about Iraq, is that things have &quot;gone wrong&quot;. This is of course making an assumption only a child with no war experience would ever make, or worse an ideolog with an agenda.

- Whats laughable in this argument is the gact that it has to start with the stupid assumption that the enemy is going to just remain static. Nothing could be further from the truth, particularly when the enemy is already using terrorist tactics, since he can&#039;t hope to win in a linear, mano-el-mano battle, against the American forces. On those few occassions when they&#039;ve even tried they&#039;ve been slaughtered wholesale.

- In other words it wouldn&#039;t matter on some levels who the hell was in Rummys position. The enemy will adjust to avoid losses and thwart your plans, no matter how often you adjust. Add to that the &quot;sneak in attack and run&quot; tactics of the Jahidists, and you see the problem. Rummys a tough cookie, which is probably the best you can hope for in someone with his responsibilities.

I certainly didn&#039;t agree with all his deciusions, but I also know full well I don&#039;t see the whole picture, so I can&#039;t really judge him at the time, in the heat of the moment. Incidently, the enemy just loves this kind of Liberal ankle biting crap, but the Left is so hungery to regain power they could care less, so they&#039;ll pile on, even though its an empty, feckless gesture.

- Rummy has done about average in some regards, below average in others, and above average in still others. The cater-walling is pure sour grapes, and will continue as long as the DoJ is allowed to fight the changes that are needed in this type of warfare. 

- Lastly, the executive civilian government decides policy, not the military. Only an idiot with a wish for a runaway Totalitarian system would want it otherwise. A major part of the way our Constitution, and governmental strutures are setup, are teeming with safegaurds against the Military ever becoming its own regime. So when you see a handfull of retired generals playing President, you can pretty much disregard. They&#039;re wrong on all fronts, and probably interested in big speaking fee&#039;s and book sales.

- So much for the lefts/Steves(fn) strawman.

- Bang **==</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Actually good old Steve(fn) has sucked you into another strawman phoney debate. The main premise behind the lefts loud endless screeching about Iraq, is that things have &#8220;gone wrong&#8221;. This is of course making an assumption only a child with no war experience would ever make, or worse an ideolog with an agenda.</p>
<p>- Whats laughable in this argument is the gact that it has to start with the stupid assumption that the enemy is going to just remain static. Nothing could be further from the truth, particularly when the enemy is already using terrorist tactics, since he can&#8217;t hope to win in a linear, mano-el-mano battle, against the American forces. On those few occassions when they&#8217;ve even tried they&#8217;ve been slaughtered wholesale.</p>
<p>- In other words it wouldn&#8217;t matter on some levels who the hell was in Rummys position. The enemy will adjust to avoid losses and thwart your plans, no matter how often you adjust. Add to that the &#8220;sneak in attack and run&#8221; tactics of the Jahidists, and you see the problem. Rummys a tough cookie, which is probably the best you can hope for in someone with his responsibilities.</p>
<p>I certainly didn&#8217;t agree with all his deciusions, but I also know full well I don&#8217;t see the whole picture, so I can&#8217;t really judge him at the time, in the heat of the moment. Incidently, the enemy just loves this kind of Liberal ankle biting crap, but the Left is so hungery to regain power they could care less, so they&#8217;ll pile on, even though its an empty, feckless gesture.</p>
<p>- Rummy has done about average in some regards, below average in others, and above average in still others. The cater-walling is pure sour grapes, and will continue as long as the DoJ is allowed to fight the changes that are needed in this type of warfare. </p>
<p>- Lastly, the executive civilian government decides policy, not the military. Only an idiot with a wish for a runaway Totalitarian system would want it otherwise. A major part of the way our Constitution, and governmental strutures are setup, are teeming with safegaurds against the Military ever becoming its own regime. So when you see a handfull of retired generals playing President, you can pretty much disregard. They&#8217;re wrong on all fronts, and probably interested in big speaking fee&#8217;s and book sales.</p>
<p>- So much for the lefts/Steves(fn) strawman.</p>
<p>- Bang <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_flag.gif' alt='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' class='wp-smiley' width='25' height='18' title='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Center for Sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106391</link>
		<dc:creator>Center for Sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 02:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106391</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Putting 6 Retired Generals into Perspective&lt;/strong&gt;

First of all you have 6 generals, who out of there concern for our troops and military, waited YEARS till they retired to speak out. Do you KNOW how many generals there are in the Armed Forces? No?
Let me help you put this in the proper perspective ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Putting 6 Retired Generals into Perspective</strong></p>
<p>First of all you have 6 generals, who out of there concern for our troops and military, waited YEARS till they retired to speak out. Do you KNOW how many generals there are in the Armed Forces? No?<br />
Let me help you put this in the proper perspective &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106389</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 02:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106389</guid>
		<description>Ok, let&#039;s get some perspective on the 6 generals speaking out.

First of all you have 6 generals, who out of there concern for our troops and military, waited YEARS till they retired to speak out.

Do you &lt;b&gt;KNOW&lt;/b&gt; how many generals there are in the Armed Forces?

No?

Let me help you put this in the proper perspective then:

ARMY GENERALS: 12
ARMY LT GENERALS: 49
ARMY MAJ GENERALS: 97
ARMY BRIG GENERALS: 154

&lt;b&gt;TOTAL ARMY GENERALS: 312&lt;/b&gt;


MARINE GENERALS: 5
MARINE LT GENERALS: 15
MARINE MAJ GENERALS: 21
MARINE BRIG GENERALS: 41

&lt;b&gt;TOTAL MARINE GENERALS: 82&lt;/b&gt;


AIRFORCE GENERALS: 13
AIRFORCE LT GENERALS: 37
AIRFORCE MAJ GENERALS: 85
AIRFORCE BRIG GENERALS: 138

&lt;b&gt;TOTAL AIRFORCE GENERALS: 273&lt;/b&gt;


NAVY ADMIRAL (GENERALS): 9
NAVY VICE ADMIRAL (GENERALS): 31
NAVY REAR ADMIRAL (U) (GENERALS): 68
NAVY REAR ADMIRAL (L) (GENERALS): 106

&lt;b&gt;TOTAL NAVY ADMIRAL (GENERALS): 214&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;b&gt;TOTAL ARMED FORCES ACTIVE GENERALS: 881&lt;/b&gt;

Deptartment of Defense
Active Duty Military Personnel by rank/Grade
February 18, 2006.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dior.whs.mil/mmid/military/rg0602.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;

Out of that 881 Generals, you have 6 that retired, and are speaking out. Correct me if I am wrong, but that is approximately what, .6 percent of all generals on Active Duty? Less that one percent.

Out of the 881 Generals you have 6 retired generals that waited YEARS before retiring to speak out (out of concern for the troops and our military).

These 6 Generals are what the Media is holding up as proof that the Military doesn&#039;t suppose the President, that even the President&#039;s own Generals do not support him.

Also posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://centerforsanity.blogspot.com/2006/04/putting-6-retired-generals-into.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;, on my Blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let&#8217;s get some perspective on the 6 generals speaking out.</p>
<p>First of all you have 6 generals, who out of there concern for our troops and military, waited YEARS till they retired to speak out.</p>
<p>Do you <b>KNOW</b> how many generals there are in the Armed Forces?</p>
<p>No?</p>
<p>Let me help you put this in the proper perspective then:</p>
<p>ARMY GENERALS: 12<br />
ARMY LT GENERALS: 49<br />
ARMY MAJ GENERALS: 97<br />
ARMY BRIG GENERALS: 154</p>
<p><b>TOTAL ARMY GENERALS: 312</b></p>
<p>MARINE GENERALS: 5<br />
MARINE LT GENERALS: 15<br />
MARINE MAJ GENERALS: 21<br />
MARINE BRIG GENERALS: 41</p>
<p><b>TOTAL MARINE GENERALS: 82</b></p>
<p>AIRFORCE GENERALS: 13<br />
AIRFORCE LT GENERALS: 37<br />
AIRFORCE MAJ GENERALS: 85<br />
AIRFORCE BRIG GENERALS: 138</p>
<p><b>TOTAL AIRFORCE GENERALS: 273</b></p>
<p>NAVY ADMIRAL (GENERALS): 9<br />
NAVY VICE ADMIRAL (GENERALS): 31<br />
NAVY REAR ADMIRAL (U) (GENERALS): 68<br />
NAVY REAR ADMIRAL (L) (GENERALS): 106</p>
<p><b>TOTAL NAVY ADMIRAL (GENERALS): 214</b></p>
<p><b>TOTAL ARMED FORCES ACTIVE GENERALS: 881</b></p>
<p>Deptartment of Defense<br />
Active Duty Military Personnel by rank/Grade<br />
February 18, 2006.<br />
<a href="http://www.dior.whs.mil/mmid/military/rg0602.pdf" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>
<p>Out of that 881 Generals, you have 6 that retired, and are speaking out. Correct me if I am wrong, but that is approximately what, .6 percent of all generals on Active Duty? Less that one percent.</p>
<p>Out of the 881 Generals you have 6 retired generals that waited YEARS before retiring to speak out (out of concern for the troops and our military).</p>
<p>These 6 Generals are what the Media is holding up as proof that the Military doesn&#8217;t suppose the President, that even the President&#8217;s own Generals do not support him.</p>
<p>Also posted <a href="http://centerforsanity.blogspot.com/2006/04/putting-6-retired-generals-into.html" rel="nofollow">Here</a>, on my Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106367</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106367</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Don&#039;t you think that maybe these Generals are concerned about their military and Rummy&#039;s destruction of it? &lt;/b&gt;

Laughable statement, and obviously clueless.
IF, and I say IF, therse generals were truly concerned, they would not have waited years down the road for when they retire to say something so they can get on the talk show circuits.

The MSM would have had the same reaction and would have brought them on TV and interviewed them the same, but why, if the generals were so concerned, did they not speak out until years later and when they retired?

&lt;b&gt;Could it be that they are correct. &lt;/b&gt;

Possibly, but then again, what about the hundreds of other generals who say different? Who says they are not correct? You have 6 out of how many generals say negatives?

I will grant you that it is possible they can be correct, as long as you grant the same that they can be incorrect and doing this for possibly reasons that are not so benign as you seem to think.


&lt;b&gt;Nothing in Iraq has gone the way bush/Rummy/Cheney said it would &lt;/b&gt;

President Bush did say this would be a War that would be like no other. 

We are fighting terrorists, not a country, not an army. Conventional warfare, which is what these generals are used to, will not work when fighting terrorists and I do agree that they may have a bone to pick and hard feelings with the shake up Rummy is doing to the military. 

Generals, are probably the most set in their ways and are used to giving orders and not taking them. when you have a civvie like Rummy come in, giving orders, revamping things, killing off generals pet projects and interests, I am sure they would be quite bent out of shape.

Guess for some, they cannot adapt and overcome.

Like I said, if they were so concerned, why wait till years later and till they retire, if they are so concerned for our military and troops?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Don&#8217;t you think that maybe these Generals are concerned about their military and Rummy&#8217;s destruction of it? </b></p>
<p>Laughable statement, and obviously clueless.<br />
IF, and I say IF, therse generals were truly concerned, they would not have waited years down the road for when they retire to say something so they can get on the talk show circuits.</p>
<p>The MSM would have had the same reaction and would have brought them on TV and interviewed them the same, but why, if the generals were so concerned, did they not speak out until years later and when they retired?</p>
<p><b>Could it be that they are correct. </b></p>
<p>Possibly, but then again, what about the hundreds of other generals who say different? Who says they are not correct? You have 6 out of how many generals say negatives?</p>
<p>I will grant you that it is possible they can be correct, as long as you grant the same that they can be incorrect and doing this for possibly reasons that are not so benign as you seem to think.</p>
<p><b>Nothing in Iraq has gone the way bush/Rummy/Cheney said it would </b></p>
<p>President Bush did say this would be a War that would be like no other. </p>
<p>We are fighting terrorists, not a country, not an army. Conventional warfare, which is what these generals are used to, will not work when fighting terrorists and I do agree that they may have a bone to pick and hard feelings with the shake up Rummy is doing to the military. </p>
<p>Generals, are probably the most set in their ways and are used to giving orders and not taking them. when you have a civvie like Rummy come in, giving orders, revamping things, killing off generals pet projects and interests, I am sure they would be quite bent out of shape.</p>
<p>Guess for some, they cannot adapt and overcome.</p>
<p>Like I said, if they were so concerned, why wait till years later and till they retire, if they are so concerned for our military and troops?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106360</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 23:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106360</guid>
		<description>Hey steve, you should be happy with Rumsfeld, if you feel he&#039;s destroying the military. You hate the military and war, so you should be as happy as a pig in scheise!

Rumsfeld has done nothing but help the military. It is a far far more potent, lethal, effective, efficient, and flexible force now than when he came in, largely due to his efforts. Oh, Lorica, he canceled a project that I was on that eventually led to me being laid off from that company after the work evaporated. Know what I think of him for that? He was right to cancel it, it was a bloated, non-functional POS (this was a major sim system). It didn&#039;t work, the govt had sunk tens of millions of dollars in it, and it would never have worked. Putting it out of everyones misery was the best decision I could think of, and it took someone of Rumsfeld&#039;s rank to force the issue. 

Rummy is AOK in my book...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey steve, you should be happy with Rumsfeld, if you feel he&#8217;s destroying the military. You hate the military and war, so you should be as happy as a pig in scheise!</p>
<p>Rumsfeld has done nothing but help the military. It is a far far more potent, lethal, effective, efficient, and flexible force now than when he came in, largely due to his efforts. Oh, Lorica, he canceled a project that I was on that eventually led to me being laid off from that company after the work evaporated. Know what I think of him for that? He was right to cancel it, it was a bloated, non-functional POS (this was a major sim system). It didn&#8217;t work, the govt had sunk tens of millions of dollars in it, and it would never have worked. Putting it out of everyones misery was the best decision I could think of, and it took someone of Rumsfeld&#8217;s rank to force the issue. </p>
<p>Rummy is AOK in my book&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106357</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 23:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106357</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you think that maybe these Generals are concerned about their military and Rummy&#039;s destruction of it? Could it be that they are correct. Nothing in Iraq has gone the way bush/Rummy/Cheney said it would and those three ain&#039;t no smarter now then they were then. Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you think that maybe these Generals are concerned about their military and Rummy&#8217;s destruction of it? Could it be that they are correct. Nothing in Iraq has gone the way bush/Rummy/Cheney said it would and those three ain&#8217;t no smarter now then they were then. Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106350</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106350</guid>
		<description>One thing I know about Generals is this.  Many of them believe that they are kings amongst their commands.  They absolutely HATE have their toes stepped on, and one thing we know about Rummy is that he don&#039;t care who&#039;s toes he steps on.  =))  I don&#039;t really like Rummy, but my reasons are personal not professional.  The base I work on makes Howitzers (big cannon goes &quot;BOOM&quot;)  When Rummy canceled the latest and greatest Self Propelled Howitzer there were some Seriously &quot;upset&quot; People.  =))  Ohhh and the lastest Paladin was a sweet, sweet weapons system.    But Rummy was right, Why focus on last century&#039;s technology when there is all sorts of new technologies to look into.  Well when the Generals realized they were not going to lose their finances they quieted down fast enough.  

I guess my whole point is, most of us don&#039;t have a clue at how many people are PO&#039;d at Rummy.  It is illegal for them to say anything while they are commissioned so why not talk once you retire.  Also the talk circuit is flooded with generals.  Might not be a whole lot of money there, but I wonder how much the MSM gives for an appearance on one of their hate the Bush admin shows. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I know about Generals is this.  Many of them believe that they are kings amongst their commands.  They absolutely HATE have their toes stepped on, and one thing we know about Rummy is that he don&#8217;t care who&#8217;s toes he steps on.  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' />  I don&#8217;t really like Rummy, but my reasons are personal not professional.  The base I work on makes Howitzers (big cannon goes &#8220;BOOM&#8221;)  When Rummy canceled the latest and greatest Self Propelled Howitzer there were some Seriously &#8220;upset&#8221; People.  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' />  Ohhh and the lastest Paladin was a sweet, sweet weapons system.    But Rummy was right, Why focus on last century&#8217;s technology when there is all sorts of new technologies to look into.  Well when the Generals realized they were not going to lose their finances they quieted down fast enough.  </p>
<p>I guess my whole point is, most of us don&#8217;t have a clue at how many people are PO&#8217;d at Rummy.  It is illegal for them to say anything while they are commissioned so why not talk once you retire.  Also the talk circuit is flooded with generals.  Might not be a whole lot of money there, but I wonder how much the MSM gives for an appearance on one of their hate the Bush admin shows. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forest hunter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106346</link>
		<dc:creator>forest hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106346</guid>
		<description>You can just stop at &quot;Nothing to contribute....&quot;, as if that weren&#039;t obvious by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can just stop at &#8220;Nothing to contribute&#8230;.&#8221;, as if that weren&#8217;t obvious by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106342</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106342</guid>
		<description>Nothing to contribute except invective, the argument goes to my side. Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing to contribute except invective, the argument goes to my side. Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bang Hunter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106317</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bang Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106317</guid>
		<description>- Its official. The National Acadamy of Arts and sinuses has completed a study of planetary alien life forms and reports that all life on earth is in imminant danger should Steve(FN) ever escape his cage and replicate. 

- However, on the bright side the orifice of homely defense has determined that this menace can be easily driven off with bug spray, tidy bowl, or a good strong anti-deoderant.

- Bang **==</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Its official. The National Acadamy of Arts and sinuses has completed a study of planetary alien life forms and reports that all life on earth is in imminant danger should Steve(FN) ever escape his cage and replicate. </p>
<p>- However, on the bright side the orifice of homely defense has determined that this menace can be easily driven off with bug spray, tidy bowl, or a good strong anti-deoderant.</p>
<p>- Bang <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_flag.gif' alt='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' class='wp-smiley' width='25' height='18' title='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forest hunter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106195</link>
		<dc:creator>forest hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106195</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;d like to know is who unzipped his fly again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;d like to know is who unzipped his fly again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CavalierX</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/comment-page-1/#comment-106189</link>
		<dc:creator>CavalierX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/04/15/the-war-on-rummy/#comment-106189</guid>
		<description>I see the resident moron&#039;s put his two cents in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the resident moron&#8217;s put his two cents in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
