Comments on: FDR and domestic surveillance http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/ Don't dis or dismiss this miss! Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Big Bang Hunter http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-123127 Big Bang Hunter Wed, 10 May 2006 19:50:21 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/#comment-123127 - Chasm, FISA is about domestic wiretapping. Once a communications of any form passes over the borders of the US it ceases to be "domestic". Why is that so hard for moonbats to comprehend. On second thought, nevermind. - Bang **== - Chasm, FISA is about domestic wiretapping. Once a communications of any form passes over the borders of the US it ceases to be “domestic”. Why is that so hard for moonbats to comprehend. On second thought, nevermind.

- Bang **==

]]> By: Chasm http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-123103 Chasm Wed, 10 May 2006 19:05:47 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/#comment-123103 Yes, stackja is using tu quoque, and the entire post is based on a Red Herring. Just because FDR looked for loopholes in ambiguous wiretapping laws durnig WWII doesn't mean G.W. Bush can break a law passed by Congress to specifically deal with this issue. Yes, stackja is using tu quoque, and the entire post is based on a Red Herring. Just because FDR looked for loopholes in ambiguous wiretapping laws durnig WWII doesn’t mean G.W. Bush can break a law passed by Congress to specifically deal with this issue.

]]> By: Keith http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-122986 Keith Wed, 10 May 2006 16:28:39 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/#comment-122986 The above post is an founded on a tu quoque fallacy. Agree or disagree; show your reasoning. The above post is an founded on a tu quoque fallacy. Agree or disagree; show your reasoning.

]]> By: stackja1945 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-122270 stackja1945 Wed, 10 May 2006 09:48:53 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/#comment-122270 FDR was a Democrat fighting Fascists. The Dems say Bush is a Fascist fighting democrats. What qualifies the terrorists as democrats is a question only the Dems can answer. They probably will duck the question. FDR was a Democrat fighting Fascists.
The Dems say Bush is a Fascist fighting democrats.
What qualifies the terrorists as democrats is a question only the Dems can answer. They probably will duck the question.

]]> By: Big Bang Hunter http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-121968 Big Bang Hunter Wed, 10 May 2006 04:51:13 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/#comment-121968 - Karl is snickering and rubbing his hands together Bak. Hes just loving it, hoping Reid/Kennedy/Pelosi/Schumer steps in the "soft on terror" doodoo yet again. - I'm not so sure about Specters motives. After that pevish display of anger exchanged between him and Kennedrunk during the Roberts hearings, it could well be hes egging the Dummycrabs on. Heh - Bang **== - Karl is snickering and rubbing his hands together Bak. Hes just loving it, hoping Reid/Kennedy/Pelosi/Schumer steps in the “soft on terror” doodoo yet again.

- I’m not so sure about Specters motives. After that pevish display of anger exchanged between him and Kennedrunk during the Roberts hearings, it could well be hes egging the Dummycrabs on. Heh

- Bang **==

]]> By: Marshall Art http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-121964 Marshall Art Wed, 10 May 2006 04:39:52 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/#comment-121964 Mwalimu, I just spit my pop! Thanks. But we should be expecting such a thing. Too bad the libs will ignore the obvious parallels. Mwalimu, I just spit my pop! Thanks.

But we should be expecting such a thing. Too bad the libs will ignore the obvious parallels.

]]> By: Mwalimu Daudi http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-121890 Mwalimu Daudi Wed, 10 May 2006 01:55:14 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/#comment-121890 <strong>IMPEACH ROOSEVELT NOW! IMPEACH ROOSEVELT NOW!</strong> /end_chant IMPEACH ROOSEVELT NOW! IMPEACH ROOSEVELT NOW!

/end_chant

]]> By: Baklava http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-121296 Baklava Tue, 09 May 2006 17:17:10 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/05/09/fdr-and-domestic-surveillance/#comment-121296 Boy are we privledged today ST. So much great stuff to read from you. Yes. Perspective is the problem. Double-standards and hypocracy it is called also. While Arlen Specter seems to being aiding the Democrats, Nancy Pelosi would NOT end the NSA surveillance. Yet both are harping on it and asking for details and wanting investigations. Boy are we privledged today ST. So much great stuff to read from you.

Yes. Perspective is the problem. Double-standards and hypocracy it is called also.

While Arlen Specter seems to being aiding the Democrats, Nancy Pelosi would NOT end the NSA surveillance. Yet both are harping on it and asking for details and wanting investigations.

]]>