- Contrary to Pam’s natterings I had not looked at the statistics until her false comments triggered me into it. Not surprising in study after study, percentages of anywhere from 68 to 79%, pretty much squares with my professional experience.

- I can certainly understand why decent gays are distressed, and feel it’s unfair for everyone to be lumped in the same bag, and I aggree and wouldn’t condone that, but with those kinds of percentages you can hardly call that any sort of safe environment for a child.

- So you don’t get off the hook for having a double standard andrew. What it comes done to is because the Church is a Conservative organization, the left feels its fair game for derision and bashing, while defending gays at the same time. The question always is when you say these things who do you think will believe it?

- Bang

- Bang

The problem with the church sex abuse isn’t homosexuality. Its sex abuse.

- An example occured way back during the RNC in New York. A large crowd of moonbats wanted to assemble in Central Park, to show the love you know, but they were told they could not. The leader of the tinfoil hats went ballistic “demanding his rights to assemble, decrying the trampling of his free speech, threatening to sue the city, yada yada yada.

- The Mayor listened and then told him the reason they couldn’t march was because just two months before Greenpeace had forced a bill through the city concile, outlawing large group marches in the park “because it was destroying the wildlife and foilage”. Opps……

- Bang

Sexual ambiguity?

“Yes andrew, I’m a raving intolerant bigot because I don’t want some slime bag gay camp consular pawing my son or “teaching him” his own brand of sexual orientation. Bull.”

Thats exactly it.

But condemn it here:

Don’t send them to catholic school then.

Comment by andrew @ 5/19/2006 – 1:33 am

What gives. – Lorica

What 3 people? Severian is just now giving their opinion on the subject.

Bak corrected me on the word”all”. From there it was an opinion of how Bak told me what you ment. What you mean and what you write are 2 very different things. You answered the original question of Renee P. You did not say : “Renee, I don’t feel that because a person is gay they are a pedophile, but” …. You continued to justify the comment by citing NAMBLA and the FRC. You claimed to get this from experience, which you later explain to mean reading. You might want to continue doing research. Are there gay pedophiles? Yes. And there are also heterosexuals that are pedophiles as well. And guess what Bang, they too follow the teaching cited in NAMBLA. It is about grooming the kid and gaining the kids trust. These people come from all areas of society and they need to be stopped.

I did not mis-charachterize you in any way. You did that all by yourself. You typed your words.

Sanity actually nailed the subject best here

I pointed out to you several times where you tried to change the meaning of something I posted and put words in my mouth, and you just ignored it and kept right on going. Since you insist on being both rude and petty I won’t waste any more words on you. Bon appitite’….

- Bang

When I make one I admit it. Too bad you don’t.

There’s a reason Girl Scouts have women in charge and Boy Scouts have men in charge.

- andrew. you wish to add something to the conversation? I take it you have a dim view of professional people.

- Bang