Comments on: Is there a consensus amongst scientists on global warming?

By: Lorica

Lorica — Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:18:07 +0000

I agree Hunter. I remember way back in the 70’s how all my Science Teachers were saying in 50,000 years we will be entering a new ice age. I thank God Almighty for global warming, between the 2 I would much rather have beaches over snow drifts. But I contribute to recycling, I throw away all aluminum to be recycled by Mother Earth in our land fills. And I drive my car out of my garage to get my mail at my roadside mail box that is 40 feet away, as my legs can’t carry my fat ass any more. Also I buy only plastic as I know it will add strength to the land fill for when we build our new houses on it. Just kidding – Lorica

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:28:13 +0000

Karl: I think it was in the late 60’s we heard noise of similar factless based crap from most of these same types. The problem is, that then, we were entering another ice age.

SURVEY SAYS>>>>>>!

I just read/saw a few days back a video from Canada (I think-Toronto?) that highlighted most of the factfree goredass bullshit.

If these amoeba could ever agree to which fantasy they are most inclined to adhere to, they’d have a chance of survival……like being a leech who claims-NO SWEARS! I’m a vegetarian!

By: Karl

Karl — Tue, 04 Jul 2006 06:43:37 +0000

But there are plenty of debunks of Gore’s facts as well, something the left loves to ignore.

Which continues to support my belief that much of what we say we know is in dispute, and further discussion and research is needed.

Put away the alarmist, partisan and sensationalist rhetoric and let science and reason start to work this out.

By: Ryan

Ryan — Tue, 04 Jul 2006 03:44:59 +0000

I walked from my SUV to the front door of my apartment. There’s my contribution.

By: Tim Lambert

Tim Lambert — Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:29:26 +0000

Lindzen gets the science wrong.

By: benning

benning — Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:55:07 +0000

Glaciers growing, and increased rainfall, may actually be harbingers of something far different from Global Warming. So much data is being ignored by the Algorists that the "debate" has become silly. Yet another crisis manufactured by those who would destroy the world for a Socialist future.

By: OutragedRichard.com

OutragedRichard.com — Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:13:27 +0000

Maybe the global warming controversy is about getting back to the Three Rs, that’s:

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.

Stop stuffing your face with food, maybe grow a backyard garden.

Stop your addiction to stuffing your senses with materialistic desires, gorging on pallets of Made in China plastic junk you need to need at Wal-mart. Try living in moderation.

Get a more reasonable car instead of a Cadillac Escalade with 22 inch rims and your idiot thug friends to go along in it.

Try to walk more.

Instead of living a convenient and decadent lifestyle, learn to reuse. Buy a used car, a used house, see if what you normally throw away has another use. Learn how things work and function, repair them yourself.

Recycle as part of living a moderate lifestyle. Appreciate better the trail of refuse you dribble behind you.

The many factories and cars spewing out pollution is because of your unprincipled lifestyle, your need for “stuff,” and your fat unwalkable bottom. The stores with crap piled floor to ceiling is because of you.

These are the things the global warming goon squad should be talking about.

By: Erich Riesenberg

Erich Riesenberg — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:08:22 +0000

There are still people who claim the earth is flat, humans have never been to the moon and smoking does not cause cancer.

When it comes to science, I have found it best to rely on the 99% who agree. When it comes to the end of the planet, I would probably settle when 90% agree, to be safe.

By: Leaning Straight Up

Leaning Straight Up — Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:23:26 +0000

Another inconvenient lack of consensus on Global Warming- From MIT

I have gotten a lot of flack for my stance on Global Warming, which is that the scientific community is not totally unified in lockstep consensus behind Al Gore and his Inconvenient Truth assertions.
This article just published is case in poi…