Comments on: Bob Novak reveals Plame source

By: Amy Proctor

Amy Proctor — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 03:32:30 +0000

Got the facts straightened out.

Dems suck!

By: Marshall Art

Marshall Art — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:24:41 +0000

Despite the fact that no crime was committed (so it seems), one can still be guilty of lying to investigators as they attempt to determine whether or not there really was a crime. Is this not so? I mean, it would suck to get busted for lying when there’s nothing to lie about, but that’s what it seems Libby needs to worry about. I would hope that his “crime” would be overlooked, but, since he’s one of Rove’s buds, he could still be worked over legally. Is this true?

By: G-Monster

G-Monster — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:59:51 +0000

It was pretty obvious this was a non-story from the beginning. The left wing and left wing media were stupid to put so much energy into this pack of lies.

They had run out of credibility a long time ago, and by putting all thier eggs in this basket, they have once again made themselves look like idiots.

By: Amy Proctor

Amy Proctor — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:53:01 +0000

Robert Novak Reveals Sources for Plame “Outing”

The three sources who told Novak of Plame’s identity were:

By: Amy Proctor

Amy Proctor — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:09:56 +0000

I’m slightly confused, too. Novak said he had THREE sources. It looks like one is Rove, one is Harlow and one is Wilson. Here’s a quote:

“When Fitzgerald arrived, he had a third waiver in hand — from Bill Harlow, the CIA public information officer who was my CIA source for the column confirming Mrs. Wilson’s identity. I answered questions using the names of Rove, Harlow and my primary source.”

And:

“Following my interview with the primary source, I sought out the second administration official and the CIA spokesman for confirmation. I learned Valerie Plame’s name from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America.” ”

If Rove isn’t a source, who is the third?

By: Conservative Outpost

Conservative Outpost — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:24:02 +0000

Novak says Rove “not the source”

Well, well, well. Looks like another big disappointment for our friends on the left. Another shoe that didn’t drop.Syndicated columnist Robert Novak said yesterday in his first public comments on the Valerie Plame leak investigation that White House a…

By: Lorica

Lorica — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:09:31 +0000

LOL Isn’t it odd that whenever there is Major News Rush is on vacation???? – Lorica

By: benning

benning — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:38:48 +0000

Does anybody have a copy of Who’s Who? Or a photo of the page with the entry? Be kinda funny to post that all over the Net!

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:32:45 +0000

- I think we’re close Forest….something Like Rove/Bush 39 – Liberals/MSM 0

- Bang

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:31:23 +0000

- Of course one of the other interesting aspects that comes out of this, is if Harlow is one of Novaks sources, then he was acting against agency rules even if all he did was confirm that she worked there. Thats a standing CIA approach to things to just deny everything. If it was legal then she must have been reduced to just a clerk at that time, and had no standing as an agent. But even more interesting is whether this is support of the “anti-Bush” cabal idea, supposidly operating within the agency, using leaks to hurt Bush and cover up their own duplicity in getting caught flat footed by 9/11 and the entire al Qaeda mess. Paint Bush as the bad guy by floating rumors that WH officials were the “source”. Nice little ploy. The MSM won’t be interested now for some reason.

- Bang

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:29:16 +0000

So Bang, what’s the current score? 0 and forty something?

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:15:06 +0000

- BTW, just a heads up….Novak is supposed to appear with Brit Hume on his afternoon news show on FOX tomorrow. That should pretty much scare all the Liberal cockroaches back under their rocks for good on the “Plame non-story”. Don’t be surprised if it suddenly “disappears” from the MSM news coverage.

- Bang

By: NC Cop

NC Cop — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:10:05 +0000

Thanks Hunter, it just got a little confusing there for a minute!!

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:06:35 +0000

- The Left wing media is still trying desperately to spin this…. They’re banking on the idea that most people are too lazy to read the whole story and they can keep the lies going. Simple. Novak says that Rove was an after thought, and that after he called Rove he got Plames name from the “Who’s Who” registry, where her husbaand had entered it. He said to Rove…”I heard that Wilsons wife works at the CIA”…Rove replied “Oh you know about that too”. Notice no names were even mentioned, and Rove was only responding to Novaks statement. Theres a bit of a difference between them as to what Roves words were exactly, but both versions are essentially the same.

- Result. The only “leak”, which wasn’t a leak, came from her Husbands entries in several public places, and the CIA contact man. Theres a third person Novak will probably name soon, but he says that person is not an administration official. Basically this was probably a Left-win scam drummed up because Wilson didn’t get the angry response he wanted from the White House over the pack of lies he wrote in his original report.

- Fitzgerald has a bigger problem now. Now everyone knows he’s known this info all along, and that the entire investigation was a partisan sham. The question now is what about Libby. If there was no leak, no crime, then what exactly thats material could he have lied about. More over, Fitz is going to have a very hard time blocking Libby from calling Wilson and others too testify, which could really blow the wheels off this little Liberal charade.

- Things should really get interesting in the coming weeks.

- In a related story, I just heard a guy on O’Reilly’s show state that Michelle Malkin was told by Fitzgerald, that the NYTrash warned an Orginization with known ties to al Qaeda that the Feds were planning to raid their offices. He said Malkin would be blogging on it soon, so maybe we’ll finally get to see what passes for patriotism in the fevor swamps of the Left and the drive-by media.

- Bang

By: NC Cop

NC Cop — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:52:29 +0000

Ok, guys help me out. Why is Yahoo reporting that Novak just admitted that Rove was his source?

I admit I’m a little confused.

But that’s nothing new!!!!!!!!