Comments on: The war on Lieberman

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:36:06 +0000

The Dimbulbs win polls, the Repubs win elections. Works for me….

- Bang

By: Lorica

Lorica — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:32:46 +0000

Well there you go, we just heard the Democrat party line, Thanks Paul. The one idea I am working on is disastous, did we win Iraq war??? I think the Answer is YES!! Are we dealing with the situations that arise from the foreign fighters that are there?? The Answer to that is Yes. Have we found WMDs in Iraq, yes. Have we shut down the rape and torture rooms, yes again. Have we brought down a tyranical dictator, yes. Did we kill his horrible children, who raped and pillage the people, yes. Did we establish an Arab Democracy the first that I am aware of, Yes. But what do we get from the Dems, we lost, are losing, and will soon be destroyed. I seriously doubt that Lieberman is going to lose to Lamont, and I don’t really care what the polls show. You are not going to win elections running around like Chicken Little. I am certain you will desire to argue this point with me, but the proof is in the pudding, and we shall see who is right and who is wrong, and November is still quite a ways away. – Lorica

By: Severian

Severian — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:28:45 +0000

The preceding moonbat talking points have been brought to you by Krelm tofu flavored toothpaste. If you need to wash the taste of evil capitalism and warmongering Democrats out ouf your mouth, you can rely on Krelm tooth paste. Now available in refreshing May Day Mint, just look for the package with the picture of your friendly Uncle Che’ on the box. Remember, Krelm for all your anti-capitalist, anti-US needs!

By: Paul Abrams

Paul Abrams — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:05:06 +0000

Like rumors of Mark Twain’s death, the negative implications of a Lamont victory have been greatly exaggerated. Joe Lieberman is NOT just someone who voted for the war—as did many other Democratic Senators who have since said, “if I knew then what I know now, I would have changed my vote”. Nor is Lieberman someone who believes we still have a chance of impacting the outcome in Iraq, and thus ought to remain engaged.
Recall: Lieberman is an ENTHUSIAST for the war, who believes that removing Saddam and occupying Iraq is good policy, worth the sacrifice of 2500+ US dead, another 12,000 seriously wounded, and the expenditure, already, of $5000 per family in the US. I do not think there is one other Democratic Senator who believes that the invasion and occupation was a good idea. Most recognize now that the policy accomplished exactly the opposite of what the (rolling)rationales claimed: we have increased, not decreased, terrorism; we have strengthed Iran; we have weakened the United States, overextending the military and bogging us down in an area that for 1400 years has never known peace. One might note in passing that Lieberman himself sat out the Vietnam War, and not a single Lieberman child has volunteered,,i.e, Lieberman is an enthusiast for “other peoples’ children” to sacrifice.
Recall: Lieberman “warned” Demoncrats about criticizing George Bush.
Note: Lieberman is one of the few Democrats that voted for $16 Billion in subsidies to the oil companies in a year of RECORD profits.

Lamont’s victory will, in no way, consign the Democratic party to the “nutty left”. What is will do is send a clear signal to cowardly Congressmen and Senators that “stay-the-course” is not a winning electoral strategy, any more than it will bbring peace, democracy and stability to Iraq. Hopefully, a Lamont victory, much like McCarthy’s in 1968, will bring a more rapid end to this disastrous policy. (And, I note that, but for the assassination of Robert Kennedy, the McCarthy victory would also have led to a Democrat winning the WH in 1968.

Paul Abrams

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:53:58 +0000

- This is going to get deeper as time goes on. Kos has even gone so far as tyo threaten to bolt the party if him and his moonbat colonies aren’t given more voice in the DNC decisions and candidates. With both Clintons running exactly opposite to the party screeds, the line in the sand between the Deaniac’s and Clintonista’s has been drawn. Somebody make some popcorn….

- Bang

By: Severian

Severian — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:06:25 +0000

Man, I thought for sure I’d put a period or three in that last run-on sentence somewhere!

By: Severian

Severian — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:05:21 +0000

It’s not just you MD!

The Democrats are beginning to realize just what a Faustian bargain they got when they sold the soul of their party to the unhinged, anti-war, netroots moonbats. At the time, it all seemed like a good idea, sign them up, stroke them, get their money and activism going to support the Dems, anything to try and unseat the Republicans. But now it’s coming back to haunt them, the older, more traditional power brokers are being stabbed in the back by the MoveOn/Kos/DU crowd, who are dedicated to ensuring that the Democrats field only ideologically pure candidates, that is shrieking anti-war, anti-Bush nutjobs, thus making sure that the Democrats never again field a national candidate that’s centrist enough to win an election.

I’m so upset…

By: Mwalimu Daudi

Mwalimu Daudi — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:56:22 +0000

Is it just me, or the the Democratic Party morphing into Hezbollah-lite?

By: Conservative Outpost

Conservative Outpost — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:13:49 +0000

Lieberman going down in CT??

Well, according to the latest Rasmussen poll, it looks like Joe’s gonna have to make good on his pledge to run as an Indy this fall.Battered by slings and arrows from fellow Democrats, Senator Joseph Lieberman now lags ten points…