<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yesterday&#8217;s ruling on the NSA&#8217;s warrantless wiretaps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:15:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: benning</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/comment-page-1/#comment-393577</link>
		<dc:creator>benning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/#comment-393577</guid>
		<description>Phil: &quot;... they are going to look like fools ...&quot;

Going to? You mean they&#039;ll get even worse? Gad!:o

Bang: It&#039;s funny how the Dems always scream about a Republican president overstepping the bounds of his office according to the Constitution. But they are woefully silent on thier own attempts - and success - in expanding the powers of the offices they hold. 

Martial Law? Nahhh, it&#039;d never work. The press would always warn the culprits when a raid was going to take place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil: &#8220;&#8230; they are going to look like fools &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Going to? You mean they&#8217;ll get even worse? Gad!<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_ooooh.gif' alt='&#58;&#111;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#111;' /></p>
<p>Bang: It&#8217;s funny how the Dems always scream about a Republican president overstepping the bounds of his office according to the Constitution. But they are woefully silent on thier own attempts &#8211; and success &#8211; in expanding the powers of the offices they hold. </p>
<p>Martial Law? Nahhh, it&#8217;d never work. The press would always warn the culprits when a raid was going to take place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bang Hunter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/comment-page-1/#comment-393089</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bang Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/#comment-393089</guid>
		<description>- Just remind them of the big &quot;deafeatist&quot; stamp they are now wearing across all their foreheads that gets brighter and brighter, every time they manage to force through one of their &quot;judge shopped&quot; decisions. 

- Bush kicked off exactly the right theme for all upcoming election cycles this morning, so we just need to stay on that track. &quot;Cut and runners&quot;, &quot;quiters&quot;, &quot;appeaseniks&quot;, all of it.

- This decision will be reversed, and in the mean time, nothing will stop or change. The judicial doesn&#039;t not determine the powers of the president, the Constitution does. the constitution dictates what all three branches can, and cannot do, the judicial is only impowered to interpret, not legislate. She failed ion several area&#039;s in her judgement.

- Just to stop all this &quot;Progressive&quot; ankle biting, the president should just declare martial law, but all the moonbat&#039;s heads would probably explode.

- Bang **==</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Just remind them of the big &#8220;deafeatist&#8221; stamp they are now wearing across all their foreheads that gets brighter and brighter, every time they manage to force through one of their &#8220;judge shopped&#8221; decisions. </p>
<p>- Bush kicked off exactly the right theme for all upcoming election cycles this morning, so we just need to stay on that track. &#8220;Cut and runners&#8221;, &#8220;quiters&#8221;, &#8220;appeaseniks&#8221;, all of it.</p>
<p>- This decision will be reversed, and in the mean time, nothing will stop or change. The judicial doesn&#8217;t not determine the powers of the president, the Constitution does. the constitution dictates what all three branches can, and cannot do, the judicial is only impowered to interpret, not legislate. She failed ion several area&#8217;s in her judgement.</p>
<p>- Just to stop all this &#8220;Progressive&#8221; ankle biting, the president should just declare martial law, but all the moonbat&#8217;s heads would probably explode.</p>
<p>- Bang <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_flag.gif' alt='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' class='wp-smiley' width='25' height='18' title='&#42;&#42;&#61;&#61;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/comment-page-1/#comment-392994</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/#comment-392994</guid>
		<description>Yea benning is correct, I do think that it will be overturned though.  Those radical nutcase Liberals just don&#039;t get it, they are going to look like fools when it comes to protecting our national security interests.:d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea benning is correct, I do think that it will be overturned though.  Those radical nutcase Liberals just don&#8217;t get it, they are going to look like fools when it comes to protecting our national security interests.<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_bigsmile.gif' alt='&#58;&#100;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#100;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benning</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/comment-page-1/#comment-392332</link>
		<dc:creator>benning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/#comment-392332</guid>
		<description>A Jimmuh Carter appointee. Need we say more? I await the overturning of this ruling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Jimmuh Carter appointee. Need we say more? I await the overturning of this ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Art</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/comment-page-1/#comment-391762</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/#comment-391762</guid>
		<description>From what I understand, there is some sort of action in progress that will allow the program to continue while they sort out the details of the ruling.  Sorry I can&#039;t be more specific.  I hear these things while I&#039;m driving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand, there is some sort of action in progress that will allow the program to continue while they sort out the details of the ruling.  Sorry I can&#8217;t be more specific.  I hear these things while I&#8217;m driving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carter Lackey Overturns Program That Protects This Country</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/comment-page-1/#comment-391759</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carter Lackey Overturns Program That Protects This Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/#comment-391759</guid>
		<description>[...] Sister Toldjah  Bush Diggs nsa Overturned Taylor Terrorism Wiretap   Filed in: NSA Wiretap&#039;s &#124;        7 Comments &#187;   &quot;NSA eavesdropping program ruled unconstitutional&quot;&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sister Toldjah  Bush Diggs nsa Overturned Taylor Terrorism Wiretap   Filed in: NSA Wiretap&#8217;s |        7 Comments &raquo;   &quot;NSA eavesdropping program ruled unconstitutional&quot;&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/comment-page-1/#comment-391690</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/18/yesterdays-ruling-on-the-nsas-warrantless-wiretaps/#comment-391690</guid>
		<description>Our beautiful blogmistress wrote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;We&#039;ll see what the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has to say about it, because that&#039;s where it will be headed next. I feel confident that this ruling will be overturned.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, and I thought that the Supreme Court would overturn the McCain-Feingold Restriction on Speech Act.  :(

Even if the Sixth Circuit does overturn Judge Taylor, you have to ask &lt;i&gt;when&lt;/i&gt; they will do so, and if there will be a stay sufficient to allow the Sixth Circuit to rule on the case without interrupting the program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our beautiful blogmistress wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ll see what the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has to say about it, because that&#8217;s where it will be headed next. I feel confident that this ruling will be overturned.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, and I thought that the Supreme Court would overturn the McCain-Feingold Restriction on Speech Act.  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_sad.gif' alt='&#58;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#40;' /></p>
<p>Even if the Sixth Circuit does overturn Judge Taylor, you have to ask <i>when</i> they will do so, and if there will be a stay sufficient to allow the Sixth Circuit to rule on the case without interrupting the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
