<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republican Senator Ted Stevens was the one who put the &#8217;secret hold&#8217; on the Obama/Coburn federal budget open database bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/30/republican-senator-ted-stevens-was-the-one-who-put-the-secret-hold-on-the-obamacoburn-federal-open-database-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/30/republican-senator-ted-stevens-was-the-one-who-put-the-secret-hold-on-the-obamacoburn-federal-open-database-bill/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Blog For All</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/30/republican-senator-ted-stevens-was-the-one-who-put-the-secret-hold-on-the-obamacoburn-federal-open-database-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-438239</link>
		<dc:creator>A Blog For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/30/republican-senator-ted-stevens-was-the-one-who-put-the-secret-hold-on-the-obamacoburn-federal-open-database-bill/#comment-438239</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Secret Senator Secret No More&lt;/strong&gt;

And Stevens, who was never shy about spending taxpayer money, now wants a cost benefit analysis on a bill that would essentially open up the earmark process to public review? Well, don&#039;t that beat all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Secret Senator Secret No More</strong></p>
<p>And Stevens, who was never shy about spending taxpayer money, now wants a cost benefit analysis on a bill that would essentially open up the earmark process to public review? Well, don&#8217;t that beat all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
