Bubbinski apologists are still [1] foaming at the mouth over ABC’s “The Path to 9/11 [2]” docudrama, and the whining over it has gotten so loud that even the NYT has noticed [3].
Usually when I see this much liberal handwringing about how ‘unfair’ or ‘inaccurate’ something is, that means whatever it is they’re flipping out over is well worth seeing/reading/hearing. So consider the panic-stricken cries of ‘unfair!’ and ‘inaccurate!’ as a ringing endorsement of “The Path to 9/11”.
The first part airs Sunday 9-10 at 8 pm ET and the conclusion airs Monday 9-11 at 8 pm ET.
Update I: Brian at Iowa Voice [4] asks an excellent question:
Why was a blatantly biased (and untrue) movie made by Michael Moore and released right before the 2004 Presidential election totally OK with libs, but a documentary, being aired on one of the most liberal networks on the air, placing a large share of the blame for 9/11 on Clinton isn’t?
My answer: Because the Bush-hating anti-war left are only interested in their version of the ‘facts’ [5], no matter the issue.
I’m betting that Path to 9-11 will be a lot closer to being accurate than Moore’s crockumentary ever hoped to be [6].
Update II: Noel Sheppard at Newsbusters [7] blogs extensively on the left’s smear campaign against the docudrama.
Related: