Or….

Bang rendered me speechless.

- The Liberals want it both ways. They get to bitch and moan, call the pres. a liar, demonize him and the admistration at every turn, complain endlessly about Iraq, but no one in the administration is permited to push back.

- The more they sqwuak, the more they make Bush’s argument for him. This morning press gaggle was all about the so-called press characterization of Bush’s speech as a “double-cross”. Snow was having none of it, and refused to be drawn into that strawman by the press.

- More “fantasy” from the “un-reality-based” communes of the moonbats. After we’ve had to listen to 6 years of 2700 good reasons why we should cut and run away from the WOT from the Libtards, I personally hope the GOP rolls over them like a Mac truck at every oppertunity. Their craziness, and lack of resolve to face America’s enemies has been clear from the very start.

- In a way we’re fortunate to see their agenda plainly. Lord knows what would happen to this country if they were in a position of power now. You see what the Clinton regime did, and how it eventually led to 9/11. We just can’t afford the idiotic “elitist” approach to fighting the Islamofascists ever again. If the Jihadists ever get their hands on nuclear weapons, one of our cities would have to go up in atomic dust before the Dems would move. And most probably their response would be further appeasement, to the point where we’d all end up talking Arabic. thats not the legacy I want to leave for future generations of our country. America. Love it or leave it!

- Bang

It was Karl Rove’s…

It was President Bush’s…..

Attorneys for a man accused of fraud say he was charged at the behest of presidential adviser Karl Rove in retaliation for a flood of spam e-mails sent to a campaign Web site. A federal prosecutor says the claim is “absurd.”

Link

They don’t pay Karl Rove enough, he is EVERYWHERE!

We should put together a list of all the Rove Conspiracies, see how much work Rove has been doing, besides his normal work duties that is.

Does he even sleep?

Rush brought it up on his show:

Ignored was a Gallup Poll released in late August that found an unexpected tightening in what pollsters call the “generic ballot” question: “If the election were being held today, which party’s candidate would you vote for in your congressional district?” Pundits looking to assess the national mood regularly cite the results of this question, and did so promiscuously earlier this year when Democrats enjoyed seemingly insurmountable advantages such as 54% to 38% in late June, or 51% to 40% immediately before Congress’ August recess.

But then something happened as lawmakers spent August reconnecting with their constituents. The advantage for the generic Democratic candidate slipped from 11 points in late July, to nine points in early August, and then to a statistically insignificant two points (47% to 45%) in its August 18-20 survey. Among those most likely to vote, moreover, the Democrats’ advantage disappeared entirely, with Gallup reporting a dead heat: 48% to 48%.

Anxious to understand this movement toward Republican candidates, Gallup sorted the responses to the generic-ballot question into two new categories. Are Democrats, it wanted to know, “competitive in U.S. House districts currently held by Republicans” or “just getting a larger-than-normal share of the vote in the districts they already hold”? Obviously, the odds that Democrats will retake the House are exponentially greater if they demonstrate strength against Republicans in their own backyards than if they simply accumulate larger-than-usual margins in their own districts.

Using area codes and exchanges to identify whether the voter resides in a district represented by a Democrat or a Republican, Gallup reviewed the 13 polls in 2006 in which it asked this question. Through July, Democrats not only posted two-to-one margins in districts they currently represent, but were unusually competitive in Republican-held districts as well.

For example, Democrats outpaced Republicans in Republican-held districts in several polls, with their advantage peaking at an astounding 11-point margin (51% to 40%) in late June. This verifies the widespread perception in conservative circles that Republican base voters were in open revolt against their party earlier this year.

But then Democrats began to lose favor in Republican districts, falling steadily from 51% in late June, to 46% a month later, then to 43% in early August, and finally to the current low of 40% in the August 18-20 survey. Support for Republicans, in contrast, rose 14 points in six weeks, from a low of 40% to its current level of 54%.

Change Underway

This 25-point turnaround began prior to the August 10 revelation that London and U.S. intelligence officials had thwarted a terrorist plot to blow up a dozen airliners. Interestingly, Gallup also reviewed its last pre-election poll in 2004 and learned that Republicans managed to expand their House and Senate majorities with an identical 54%-to- 40% margin of support in their own districts.

LINK

LINK

Been saying this for a very long time, and I am going to continue to say this. We are doing better in the War on Terror than most people believe. But when the major sources of information in this country have a vested interest in our loss in the WoT, what else would you expect, than the deception of the people. If you notice neither of these stories are in US newspapers. – Lorica

The MSM packed it in quickly and ran to report everything bad in Iraq.

So just because the main focus is the MSM in Iraq, doesn’t mean the US doesn’t have operations still going on in Afghanistan.

Also, just because here are htings ongoing in Iraq, les ear what your plan WOULD have been.

I am curious.

This completely mishandled war in Iraq is one very big reason why. Madrassas will keep churning out young radical lunatics brainwashed into thinking their going to heaven by blowing themselves up and very sadly some of our servicemembers.

Here’s a bulletin, Tommy: that was happening BEFORE 9/11 and well before Iraq. The WOT didn’t cause islamofascism; it’s the RESULT of islamofascism. Appeasement and running away from the enemy isn’t the answer. Osama, when he isn’t regurgitating Democrat talking points, boasts about how AQ was emboldened when Clinton turned tail in Somalia. So naturally, you want to do the same. Brilliant. Just brilliant.

In all this time, we have yet to hear ONE idea from the left about how to combat this ruthless and implacable enemy. Nothing but whining and criticism.

So how about it, Tommy…what’s YOUR plan for keeping Americans safe from terror, once you abandon any confrontation with them? It’s time to put up or shut up.