Comments on: Was Armitage not telling the whole story?

By: Webloggin

Webloggin — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:28:36 +0000

For Democrats Wire Tap Bad, Computer Hack Good

Welcome to the split personality of the Democrat Party. They simultaneously cry corruption and act corrupt at the same time. Of course it is perfectly fine to take the file as long as you know how to get it. Idiots.

…

By: J Rob

J Rob — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:35:59 +0000

When I read Armitage’s statement and explanation for saying nothing before now, something was not ringing true. If Fitz was aware of this as early on as Armitage claims then we are looking at gross prosecutorial misconduct. If it was not a crime for Armitage to make the revelation about Joe deWhiner’s wife then how is Libby’s erroneous rememberance a crime? There was no crime to commit perjury about in the first place.
Fitz knew therewas nothing to the case and proceeded so he could make some money doing nothing, but doing it in such a way that the Dems could gleefully parade Roves head on a pike. Some of them still think the indictment is forthcoming. Then again, they also believe that Bush is simultaneously the biggest idiot to ever be in office and an evil genius with the combined intellect of Lex Luthor, Thaddeus Sivana and Victor VonDoom.

By: Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » Novak A Little Miffed At Armitage

Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » Novak A Little Miffed At Armitage — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:10:00 +0000

[...] Sister Toldjah [...]

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:04:33 +0000

“It’s too complicated now” – translation: “Well crap. We thought we finally had that evil Rove, and Bush, and Cheney on a flat out Waterergate type scandal, and it all falls apart. Damn Sam. No more mining this one. Just move along.” – DNC

- BTW – After how many million lines of accusations, atricles in the lame-stream press, and countless left wing bloggers comments, including outright phoney Leopold type flaps, I have not seen one single DemDork apologize to Rove or anyone in the Bush adminstration that the moonbats were so intent in gleefuly denegrating. But that would require a tiny bit of character and class, which we all know simply does not exist in the progressive ranks.

- What a pack of losers.

- Bang

By: Severian

Severian — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:35:12 +0000

Scooter Libby is under indictment for “differing” statements that are probably less different than Armitage’s by far, but notice the break he gets? Especially from the MSM, and the “it’d too complex a story now” appologists.

By: rick vid

rick vid — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:42:16 +0000

Everybody knows that Armitage is just Rove in a bald guy suit! Rove did it! The fact that the facts show otherwise is just a clear indication of how much power the eeevvvviiiillll Rove has! He can transform the truth into facts!

Or something, but anyhow, Rove did it!

By: Burwell Stark

Burwell Stark — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:18:07 +0000

How deep will this rabbit hole go? Fitz cannot be considered an “independent” prosecutor if he was influenced to proceed when all the evidence was saying otherwise.

The question is, will the media care now?

By: G Monster

G Monster — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:58:21 +0000

If I remember correctly, Fitzgerald wasn’t even going to prosecute this case when he first got it. He was pressured into going forward. The big question is where the pressure came from. He probably got one of those letters from the senators that threatened ABC over thier broadcasting license. (P2911)

By: sanity

sanity — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:53:42 +0000

What stood out to me was this:

Armitage now says he was mute because of special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s request

At what time did Fitz make this request and WHY?

If Fitz had his source of the leak, why this investigation fiasco that went on as long as it did?

Politcal Witch hunt and who is pulling Pitz’s strings?