Comments on: Wednesday open thread

By: G Monster

G Monster — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:00:43 +0000

Rosies' poor wife...OMG...I've heard of marrying for money, but...ewww LINK Is the second link even real... Check it out...I find it hard to believe...talk about self centered... LINK

By: Tom TB

Tom TB — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:26:47 +0000

An outspoken lesbian with a wife and children; as Rosie O’Donnell is portrayed, wouldn’t exactly survive very long under Muslim Sharia law.

By: Lorica

Lorica — Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:14:38 +0000

Yeah these guys are so deceived. I cannot believe they give squat about our troops. They really just don’t understand how this garbage affects our soldiers. I am glad that there were people there that actually support the troops.

As far as Feingold goes. If it weren’t for the deceived bozos (see above paragraph) in his district this man wouldn’t be a good village idiot. So if he passes this law, in order to cover the equal protection clause of the Constitution, it will have to apply to his own side. Everytime one of his side compares a Christian to a Nazi will they be fined or jailed?? I highly doubt that.

Speaking of that. Did you hear Rosie O’Donnell telling everyone on the View that “radical Christianity” is just as dangerous as “radical Islam”??? Where the hell did she get that idea?? When is the last time Christians cut the head off of people they disagreed with?? Or fly planes into buildings?? And when Christians do say or do something stupid the rest of the Body jump all over that person …. i.e. Pat Robertson. Hell this woman couldn’t even bring herself to condemn Bill for his adultery. How can you take these people seriously. – Lorica

By: Great White Rat

Great White Rat — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:20:32 +0000

Have you seen this yet?

Russ Feingold is apparently trying to endear himself to the looniest extreme of Moonbat Nation as he plans for a White House run in 2008.

Not content with co-authoring the law that threatens to lock up anyone who spends money to criticize a sitting lawmaker during election season, he’s now appointed himself judge of what we can call the terrorists. If you haven’t guessed, he has his panties in a knot over the term “islamic fascists”.

OK, let’s review so we know what’s allowed then:

You can’t use “fascist” to describe the folks who saw off hostages’ heads, who indiscriminately murder thousand of civilians at a time, and who openly announce that we all must either convert to Islam or die.

But if you’re Dick Durbin, you can go into the well of the U.S. Senate and call our own soldiers and marines Nazis and worse. The fact that they’ve done nothing to merit such slander is irrelevant.

Got it, Russ. Thanks. At least there’s no doubt which side you’re on in the WOT.

By: Marshall Art

Marshall Art — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:51:34 +0000

Code Pink. That’s pink. Like an orangutan’s ass.

By: sanity

sanity — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:59:44 +0000

Texas Rainmaker has an excellent read on how US troops were treated by the supposed, "we support the troops", Code Pink Protestors in front of Walter Reed Military Medical Center. Soldiers comments about incident:

Mason: They wouldn't even talk to us! How are they supporting us, if they won't even talk to us, or look us in the eye? â€¦ P.D.: The general attitude was, they were kind of pushing us out. Wouldn't talk to us. Just blowing us off. â€¦ Mason: Oh, yes sir. We had told them all about our background. I served in Iraq. He served in Afghanistan and Iraq. We were patients at the hospital. That we were just curiousâ€¦ But that did not seem like a good answer to them. â€¦ Mason: The majority of â€˜em, ninety-nine percent of â€˜em, didn't even look us in the eye. Wouldn't even turn and acknowledge our presence. P.D.: Yeah, they wouldn't even turn around and look at us.

Link Yeah I believe you when you say I support the troops, just not the war. Nothing will get me more fired up that troops mistreated...argh