- Chris Wallace’s said on FOX today that Clinton’s press sect. was trying desperately to end the interview. Wonder why. He also said that Clinton was heard to say on the way out, yelling at his staffers; “If any of you ever set me up like that again you’re all fired”.

- Contrite, childish, narcissistic nut job. But then we all knew that way back in the Lewinski days.

- Bang

Shortly before the interview, Clinton has a meting of several left-wing bloggers in his Harlem office.

The question the begs an answer to was perhaps this was more of a “gotcha” on foxnews, a setup, and Clinton was just waiting on them to ask the right question so he could leap off and attack them.

York posed a possibility that CLinton “could” have been acting for the outrage in trying to do what the left-wing bloggers wanted him to do.

Interesting theory and one I am entertaining because Clinton was never one to be stupid. He HAD to have known he was going to be asked certain questions, evene a it hard hitting ones from the dreaded Fox News.

I have never heard Cliton speak like his wife or the left wing bloggers before, full of BDS syndrom and then some.

Right Wing Conspiracy, hatchet job, out to get him, attacking him…ect.

Take a moment and think, has he EVER spoke like this?
Who normally talks like this, besides his so-called wife Hillary, you normally hear BDS like this from left wing bloggers and their ‘crew’, who several of them just happened to be invited for a sit down with Clinton a short time before the interview according to York.

Thank you, again, for reminding me why I have voted Republican all my life, and will continue to do so.

A certain level of mastery of the English language would be required of him first, and Dubya’s well documented deficiencies in that department remove the idea from any rational mind.

Not surprising that he leads off with the usual ad hominem snarkiness. That’s how the left normally opens when they have no factual grounds for the spew to follow. Of course, it overlooks the Ivy League Master’s Degree the President has earned, but since when do facts matter on the left?

Neither Bush II, nor any of his people, would permit him to be in a situation where he suddenly must answer a previously undisclosed question intelligently.

In addition to two sets of unscripted presidential debates, a quick internet search will yield a ready number of no-rules one-on-one interviews with tough and often unfriendly interviewers. Sev’s point here is well-taken. Clinton is so used to sycophant interviews with the likes of Larry King and Dan Rather that anything remotely approaching a challenge sets off his well-known temper.

As a side point, think about this – Clinton could have gone a long way toward recovering some good will lost from the threats his minions made in the lead-up to P2911. All he’d have had to do was own up graciously and honestly to the errors his administration made. But you’d be hard pressed to find too many cases of gracious behavior from Clinton, much less honesty…

Bill saw through the question and its structure and called the questioner to the carpet on it without letting him get away with it.

Translation: Bill had no idea how to answer a straightforward quiestion and resorted to a hodgepodge of accusations and conspiracy theories in an effort to change the subject.

He spluttered and stopped just short of a tantrum, and showed us that even his political allies can catch hell for daring to speak the truth to him when he doesn’t like it.

The President spoke with passion about serious issues related to defending this country. No “spluttering” there. Clinton, on the other hand, gave a 14-carat exhibit of self-pity and irresponsibility. It wasn’t his fault he only talked with his CIA director once in eight years – it was the conservatives! the Republicans! and, of course, the neocons (left wing’s code word for the jooooos).

And he wouldn’t be able to put any intelligent point into words the English speaking world could comprehend even if he was.

Nice symmetry. Begin and end with the old “Bush-is-dumb” meme. BDS at its finest.

By the way, ship, since you claim to be big on putting intelligent points into words, maybe you can explain why your far-left buddies have been completely unable to express one, single, coherent, rational thought about how to confront the worldwide threat from islamofascism. We’d love to hear one.

Besides, the entire world got to see President Bush when he responded to hard questions from his own party, barely a week ago. He spluttered and stopped just short of a tantrum, and showed us that even his political allies can catch hell for daring to speak the truth to him when he doesn’t like it. He didn’t poke anyone with his fingers because he was up on a podium.

And he wouldn’t be able to put any intelligent point into words the English speaking world could comprehend even if he was.

I don’t think Bill was ready for the tough questions. I actually like Bill Clinton as a person, but he was put in the office to do a job. And to me it looks like he wasn’t focused enough on his responsibilities.

He will never live the Monica thing down, and he shouldn’t, as it was completely improper. I also noticed someone pointing out certain mannerisms that Bill Clinton used during the Chris Wallace interview.

They match up with some of the mannerisms he used when he was in a tough spot with the Monica situation. If I was playing Texas hold ‘em with him, he would be pretty easy to figure out.

Survival of the fittest at its finest.