Comments on: Senator Pat Leahy: a historical retrospective http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/09/29/senator-pat-leahy-a-historical-retrospective/ Don't dis or dismiss this miss! Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:28:30 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Drewsmom http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/09/29/senator-pat-leahy-a-historical-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-512785 Drewsmom Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:57:21 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/09/29/senator-pat-leahy-a-historical-retrospective/#comment-512785 Wow, I'm waiting with baited breath for spittin chrissy matthews, fired ass olbemann, alan devil brows colmes and all of cnn to play this ... and I'm more then sure c-left spin spann will pay it for the folks. Good Lord, these guys were cussin like sailors. The hipocracy will be OVERWHELMING. Butt:(|)'s .... if the Repulicans can't make use of this I give up.:-ss Wow, I’m waiting with baited breath for spittin chrissy matthews, fired ass olbemann, alan devil brows colmes and all of cnn to play this … and I’m more then sure c-left spin spann will pay it for the folks.
Good Lord, these guys were cussin like sailors.
The hipocracy will be OVERWHELMING.
Butt:(|)’s …. if the Repulicans can’t make use of this I give up.:-ss

]]> By: Karl http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/09/29/senator-pat-leahy-a-historical-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-512659 Karl Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:04:40 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/09/29/senator-pat-leahy-a-historical-retrospective/#comment-512659 Whoa.... This is interesting for sure. (the Murtha Abscam bit) Whoa….

This is interesting for sure. (the Murtha Abscam bit)

]]> By: Big Bang Hunter http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/09/29/senator-pat-leahy-a-historical-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-512649 Big Bang Hunter Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:31:34 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/09/29/senator-pat-leahy-a-historical-retrospective/#comment-512649 - The Democrats, as a group. continue this morning to amplify the very reasons of why they would be so singularly ill-suited to lead the US in the WOT. N. Polosi, and others, responded to president Bush's powerful, clear speech, in which he once again outlined the dangers we face, by saying that the administration is in "denial". I think the denial is clearly in the Democrat camp, not with the adminsitration. Coming on the heals of 6+ long years of Democrat obstructionism, and attemps to hobble every tool we have in fighting the Jihadist movement, it sounds a bit strange to hear her talk about "using every aspect available too us to fight this war." Apparently the Dhimmies have some secret "plan", unknown to the rest of us, which I suspect centers on Zell Millers "spit balls". - In the mean time, the Dem position seems to reside squarely in the conflicted idea that we should "get out of Iraq yesterday, but we need more troops on the ground there". If someone can make any sense out of this proclamation, I would be happy to listen to their idea's.Tto me it sounds the same as it always has. "We simply don't want to face the enemy". - As Bush said "the Democrats continue to be the party of obstruction, and second guessing, contributing no idea's or support in the ongoing WOT. The Party of FDR and Truman, has become the party of "cut and run". - Good for him. As I said in a past post. the Reps should use this issue to roll over the Dem appeasers like a Mac truck. Their bankrupt idea's endangers all of our futures and safety, and springing from partisan lust for power as they do, are not only childish, and naive', but totally unworkable. - Listen to the Democrats, and we will be fighting terrorism in the main streets of America in due time. - Bang **== - The Democrats, as a group. continue this morning to amplify the very reasons of why they would be so singularly ill-suited to lead the US in the WOT. N. Polosi, and others, responded to president Bush’s powerful, clear speech, in which he once again outlined the dangers we face, by saying that the administration is in “denial”. I think the denial is clearly in the Democrat camp, not with the adminsitration. Coming on the heals of 6+ long years of Democrat obstructionism, and attemps to hobble every tool we have in fighting the Jihadist movement, it sounds a bit strange to hear her talk about “using every aspect available too us to fight this war.” Apparently the Dhimmies have some secret “plan”, unknown to the rest of us, which I suspect centers on Zell Millers “spit balls”.

- In the mean time, the Dem position seems to reside squarely in the conflicted idea that we should “get out of Iraq yesterday, but we need more troops on the ground there”. If someone can make any sense out of this proclamation, I would be happy to listen to their idea’s.Tto me it sounds the same as it always has. “We simply don’t want to face the enemy”.

- As Bush said “the Democrats continue to be the party of obstruction, and second guessing, contributing no idea’s or support in the ongoing WOT. The Party of FDR and Truman, has become the party of “cut and run”.

- Good for him. As I said in a past post. the Reps should use this issue to roll over the Dem appeasers like a Mac truck. Their bankrupt idea’s endangers all of our futures and safety, and springing from partisan lust for power as they do, are
not only childish, and naive’, but totally unworkable.

- Listen to the Democrats, and we will be fighting terrorism in the main streets of America in due time.

- Bang **==

]]>