Comments on: Democrat demagoguing of Foley scandal extends to campaign ads

By: Common Sense Political Thought » Blog Archives » Knowing when it’s time to go

Sat, 07 Oct 2006 13:05:10 +0000

[...] Some of my friends on the conservative side (Sister Toldjah and Patterico and Dafydd ab Hugh would be three, but hardly the only examples) of the aisle have pointed out, properly, that the Democrats have been demagoguing taking advantage of the Mark Foley situation. And they’re right, the Democrats have done just that, and will continue to do just that, for as long as they see political advantage in doing so. And had Mr Foley been a Democrat, the Republicans would have been just as quick to take advantage, in a very similar manner. [...]

By: Drewsmom

Drewsmom — Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:18:32 +0000

Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly already covered the soros hand in this and he does have a hand in this, he is funding this smear on all our leaders, Foley is GONE, yall supported your perps, we told ours to take a hike, GIVE IT UP derrick.

By: Severian

Severian — Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:59:24 +0000

This is very interesting: The Blog That Started It All Foley deserves whatever happens to him, but more and more this appears to be a well orchestrated and well timed "October Surprise" from the Democrats, which is about as disgusting as the acts Foley is accused of committing. Unable to win on the basis of what they believe in, what they'd do, Democrats appear to have decided that anything goes in order to get victory. Well, at least they aren't planting IEDs to generate more troop casualties to get into office, though this is not that much better. I smell Soros' hand in all this...

By: tom

tom — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:47:46 +0000

It may be important (or not?) to note that Wetterling founded the Jacob Wetterling foundation after her own child was abducted many years ago. So she touts “child safety” as an issue near and dear to her heart. Does this excuse her misrepesentation of the Congressman as a child molester. Most certainly not. I don’t think it will be used by many Dems in campaign ads so blatantly. I can’t quibble with her use of the term coverup.

If a hunter babbles nonsense in the forest, will anyone hear a sound?

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:52:31 +0000

ROOOOOOOOVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEE! Just when you thought it was safe to go outside……..

How many of y’all thought that derricks were just tools for pumping fossil fools?

By: Baklava

Baklava — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:06:56 +0000

There is another lie ST. When the ad said, “Congressional leaders have admitted to covering up.

Which Congressional leaders admitted to covering up? As far as I have seen the Miami Hearld another paper and the FBI all had the same emails that Republican leaders have and all dismissed a broader investigation. It wasn’t until Friday when the IM’s came out that people learned of the crimes. By that time Foley stepped down and now criminal charges are being looked into. Meanwhile we have Democrats LYING about leaders admitting to covering things up?

I’m so sorry we even have to talk about this ONE guy being held accountable for his actions. All a way to shift from the WOT talk I suppose.

Any Democrat who held on to evidence (the IM’s) is liable and can be held criminally responsible for timing the hit job. Criminally liable. I hope they are held accountable to the fullest extent of the law just like Foley should be.

By: Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » The Foley Scandal Redux

Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » The Foley Scandal Redux — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:44:44 +0000

[...] Sister Toldjah [...]

By: G Monster

G Monster — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:21:20 +0000

The dems are pretty excited about the Foley thing. I guess they should be. They finally have something to talk about. But, they do have a more than a few members in thier party that were involved in scandals.

By: Severian

Severian — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:24:38 +0000

Well Derrick, the Democrats are a party that will wheel out a limbless veteran to get sympathy as a substitute for actually having a clue or a plan. Besides, said limbless veteran blew his own limbs off thru carelessness, not enemy action. Remarkably like Kerry’s “noble war wounds.” Maybe this is why Democrats are so in favor of gun control, they aren’t competent to handle weapons.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:13:05 +0000

Thanks for so expertly proving my point, Derrick.

By: Derrick

Derrick — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:11:17 +0000

Haha, this from a party that morphed a veteran who lost his limbs fighting for this country into Osama Bin Laden. I’m really sure that this hugh new ad buy by the RNC will stick to the issues and make no outlandish claims about your opponents. These are the times that Karl Rove has wrought, and I’m sorry if you don’t like it when it comes back to bite you in the butt.

By: J Rob

J Rob — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:27:05 +0000

I find the ad hilarious coming from the party that gave Gerry Studds a standing ovation.

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:02:05 +0000

- Along with this effort to mine the Folley affair for political benefit, also ment to deflect voters attention from the total lack of any Democratic party platform or idea’s, FOX is reporting there’s a plan in the works for protesters to try to use the funeral of the little girls killed by the nutcase in the Penn. schoolhouse attack. Although they’re saying it’s a Baptist group, I’m suspicious since it’s also an anti-war bunch.

- At some point I’m hoping all of this lust for power that drives these idiots severely backfires on them. The best way to stop all the anti-American craziness, either from the Left or Right extremists, is to body slam them at the ballot box. If they keep losing in elections eventually the press and money sources will lose interest.

- Bang

By: Iowa Voice

Iowa Voice — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 14:15:58 +0000

Dems Start With The Foley Ads

Looks like the Democrats are moving ahead with their plan. They’ve got Congresswoman Patty Wetterling putting out an bogus ad.

If you remember your memo from yesterday, that was #4 on the agenda: to “Choose unimpeachable spokespeople to be their …

By: RichB

RichB — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:59:56 +0000

Goodbye, Rich. –ST