Comments on: Another lying ad about Foleygate

By: Sister Toldjah » Poll news and notes - BIG news in the Maryland Senate race (MULTIPLE UPDATES)

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:26:14 +0000

[...] Embattled House Rep and Chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee Tom Reynolds (R-NY) has something to smile about today, as the latest SurveyUSA poll has him up 3 points over his demagoguing challenger Jack Davis. This has to be welcomed news for Reynolds, considering the last SurveyUSA poll taken just as Foleygate was heating up – with Reynolds taking some significant heat for his alleged ‘role’ in an alleged ‘coverup’ – had him 5 points behind Davis. Reynolds has also polled as much as 16 points behind Davis in the last couple of weeks. [...]

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:18:02 +0000

- Ok derrick….Name me ONE thing, one, that the Liberals have cooperated with the administration on in the WOT.

- Oh and BTW. You are in desperate need of a new crystal ball. Even the feckless Left can’t afford to go on yammering about a gay ex-congressman, now that the NK has tested the bomb. I kind of hope you idiots do though. It’s so You. Negotiating/talking while Rome burns, and gay bashing for political profit, busily ignoring the important events. Idiotarians, 24/7.

- Bang

By: Derrick

Derrick — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 05:02:44 +0000

First, this isn’t running out of steam anytime soon, despite your deepest wishes. Look at the Post, and you see confirmation that a Republican representative knew about Foley in 2000. Hate to say it, but you better hope that Rove can pull OBL out of his hat.

Second,you people have to be kidding me. Have you seen Republican ads this cycle. You know the ones that equate being against torture with wanting to have tea parties and spa treatments for terrorists. If you guys think for a second that Republicans are vetting their ads for accuracy, then you’ve really drunk the Kool-Aid. Your side created ads that about suggested that a Vietnam vet was looking to partner with OBL because he wanted union rights for airport screeners. Republicans have lost any right to complain about unfair charges in ads.

By: G Monster

G Monster — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:22:08 +0000

So, I’m watching Chris Mathews.(First time in ten years) He looked pretty giddy about the Foley stuff. I think in Chris Mathews mind, the dems have already taken back control of both houses. He might be right, but we still have to go through with the election process. Sorry Chris.

By: brad

brad — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:12:28 +0000

Ok does not mean its not news. Like I said: its news because his pickups were working. People are concerned about his pickups.

Also in hte article it states that the 21-year old says that the congressmen didn’t have sex with minors, but waited. Thats an important piece of information.

But certainly. Lets not cast judgment. The GOP should run foley for president.

By: Severian

Severian — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 03:54:33 +0000

Its news because it shows his pickups were working.

But Brad, it was with a 21 year old. Don’t the liberals always tell us that sex between consenting adults is OK and no one should interfere or cast judgement? Unless it can be milked for hypocritical partisan advantage that is. Principles, only when expedient eh?

By: brad

brad — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 03:14:00 +0000

Its news because it shows his pickups were working.

By: Severian

Severian — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 01:56:21 +0000

Time will tell Bang. They may have peaked too early again, kind of a premature electionation, just like they did with the fake National Guard memo story. They get sooo excited that they are going to really teach those evil conservatives a lesson that they get impatient and shoot their lip off too early.

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 01:52:37 +0000

- The Demdorks have no problem with gay bashing when it suits their purpose’s, refferring to the encounter with a 21 year old. That’s why I keep saying their whole party is a bunch of lie whores, as they use the race card, and race baiting, at every opportunity, and now to complete the hat trick, they use gay bashing to keep the distraction alive as long as possible, trying everything they can think of to steer the national debate away from their “weak on terrorism” label.

- This will run out of steam, and I have a feeling Rove has some more surprises in the works, but he’s keeping his powder dry til the right moment. When it happens I’m going to take great pleasure in laughing in the slime-ball Lefties faces. Once again they’re going to be taught, you live by the lie, you fall by the lie,

- Bang

By: antimedia

antimedia — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:22:47 +0000

Democrats lying shouldn’t be a surprise. Until Americans care enough about their government to actually pay attention, these types of slime jobs will continue to “win” votes.

By: Severian

Severian — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:10:22 +0000

Typical Democrat lies and misrepresentation. Remember, they are the ones that, in trying to push gun control, talk about all the “children” being killed in the US each year, which conveniently includes all the 15-18 year old gang bangers shooting each other over crack distribution rights. Gives the impression that thousands of little children are being gunned down on playgrounds and in their sandboxes, which isn’t the same thing as violent street thugs getting killed in drug territorial battles, it certainly sounds “better.” Bah.

Meanwhile, a baby one month or less from birth is still a foetus when you halfway birth it and such its brains out, and it’s just fine for gays to run Boy Scout troops and take them to the remote woods to go camping. At least as far as the Democrats are concerned. But they care for the children!