Daily Archives: October 10th, 2006 «

 

I knew there was something off about that DNC crowd picture

Posted by: ST on October 10, 2006 at 8:24 pm » 7 Comments

Back on Sunday I blogged about the Democrats use of a Canadian soldier’s picture on their vets and military family page. The photo of the soldier has been replaced with the photo of an American flag, but something else struck me in that picture, and I noted it in my post: I’m still curious about […]

 

Too hot to handle

Posted by: ST on October 10, 2006 at 7:33 pm » 14 Comments

The link is up at Drudge, and he reports the following: The DRUDGE REPORT has obtained an exclusive copy of a “scary” campaign advertisement created by Hollywood producer and director David Zucker that was intended to be used by GOP organizations in the closing weeks of the 2006 campaign. However, the advertisement was deemed “too […]

 

Misc. links on Foleygate

Posted by: ST on October 10, 2006 at 1:06 pm » 7 Comments

Submitted for your perusal: — John McIntyre debunks the myth that the alleged ‘coverup’ of Foley’s behavior had anything to do with ‘saving a House seat.’ Pat Buchanan wonders if it had anything to do with the fact that some of the key people involved are gay, implying that the GOP may have wanted to […]

 

Thomas Sowell on frivolous politics

Posted by: ST on October 10, 2006 at 12:04 pm » 7 Comments

The brilliant Mr. Sowell pens another must-read: With a war going on in Iraq and with Iran next door moving steadily toward a nuclear bomb that could change the course of world history in the hands of international terrorists, the question for this year’s elections is not whether you or your candidate is a Democrat […]

 

About those polls …

Posted by: ST on October 10, 2006 at 11:29 am » 20 Comments

The GOP is tanking in the polls as a result of the trumped up Foleygate scandal, and as a result, the Dems and media are gleeful and more optimistic than ever that liberals will snag back control of Congress next month. AJ Strata takes a look at those polls, and puts things in perspective for […]

 

The Norks test: US doubts it was nuclear

Posted by: ST on October 10, 2006 at 8:54 am » 5 Comments

Bill Gertz reports from the Washington Times: U.S. intelligence agencies say, based on preliminary indications, that North Korea did not produce its first nuclear blast yesterday. U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that seismic readings show that the conventional high explosives used to create a chain reaction in a plutonium-based device went […]