| Times Online | 0 | |
| Fox Boston | 0 | |
| Merc. News | 0 | |
| Big Govt | Obama’s Shock Troops: SEIU and Political Intimidation in St. Louis |
0 |
| NYT | 0 |
Audacity of Truth
Whiner-in-Chief:
"[W]hether the grumbling is about Republicans on Fox or bloggers in pajamas, there's a word for what the president and his aides are doing. That word is "whining." And nothing [...] does more damage to Obama's credibility or authority than the sense that a popular president is becoming the whiner-in-chief."
- John Nichols, Nation Magazine - 10/12/09
REMINDER: Rightroots: the answer to the left’s “Netroots”
I’ve posted this a couple of times already and wanted to bump it up again as there are only three days left to contribute to Rightroots. Here’s how to help:
My friend John Hawkins, along with a few of my favorite bloggers, has come up with an answer to left-wing blogosphere’s (Netroots) endorsement and campaign fundraising for several Democratic candidates in House and Senate races all over the country. The answer is Rightroots. Lorie Byrd, one of the bloggers who helped John select the group of candidates to support, explains:
John Hawkins enlisted Mary Katharine Ham, Erick Erickson, Patrick Hynes, Ed Morrissey, Robert Bluey and me (on behalf of Wizbang and Wizbang Politics) to help him compile a list of 18 candidates in competitive Congressional races across the country who could use the support of our readers to make the difference in holding the House and Senate for the GOP.
Incumbents, because they already have name recognition, a good amount of money and support, were not included. We also decided not to wade into any primary fights, so no primary candidates appear on the list. Gubernatorial candidates are subject to different campaign finance laws, so they were also excluded.
Great idea. On the primary front, maybe in 2008 they could get involved in some competitive Republican primaries where challengers to incumbent Republicans who haven’t been doing their jobs would receive some significant support? Just a thought …
We decided to keep the list somewhat short so that maximum attention could be directed to each of the 18 very competitive races, so please don’t be surprised or offended if your favorite candidate is not included. There are literally hundreds of deserving candidates across the country, but we tried to zero in on those congressional races in which we believed our readers could make the most difference.
To see a list of those candidates, click here. Next to their names is the amount that has been contributed so far by Rightroots supporters.
Here’s more about the candidates, and how you can help out.
Disclaimer: I am not being paid to say any of this.
Linked up with Lorie’s and John’s posts about Rightroots.
(Originally posted on Aug 3, and again on Sept. 15)
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Trackbacks
8 Responses to “REMINDER: Rightroots: the answer to the left’s “Netroots””
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
Rightroots may be well intentioned, but they shot themselves in the foot with this:
LINK
I think my contributions will be going to individual candidates, like Vernon Robinson.
I agree with stoo. Except that they blew off more than a foot with this screwup.
I will send no money to any candidate who will not shut down our borders and they have be to willing to FIGHT the war in an un-pc way and refuses to fight it from their cushy chairs in Washington and refuse to give aid and comfort to the muslims thugs during interragations…… period.
Yeah well, it’s a good idea, but the implementation is flawed. For one thing, they support candidates that have no hope, such as Irey. There is no way she will beat Murtha. For another, they do not support gubernatorial candidates, which is just plain stupid.
I don’t need Hawkins to tell me whom to support with my money. I’ll contribute directly to campaigns, thanks — primarily to Lynn Swann’s, since the state GOP, like the “rightroots,” have thrown him under the bus.
rwf, the idea wasn’t to “tell” you who to support with your money in the first place. It was a solicitation for help for candidates who could use it.