<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missouri&#8217;s Jim Talent: Your typical heartless and cruel conservative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563784</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563784</guid>
		<description>In the end this comes down to the basic liberal vs conservative debate - spending.  We&#039;re already pumping money into this here in CA and how much would you like to bet that 10 years from now the results of that spending will be nil?  And then the liberal arguments will be along the lines of, &quot;Well, we just aren&#039;t spending enough of your money on this.  If we put x billions more into it, why, then we&#039;ll get results!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end this comes down to the basic liberal vs conservative debate &#8211; spending.  We&#8217;re already pumping money into this here in CA and how much would you like to bet that 10 years from now the results of that spending will be nil?  And then the liberal arguments will be along the lines of, &#8220;Well, we just aren&#8217;t spending enough of your money on this.  If we put x billions more into it, why, then we&#8217;ll get results!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563669</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563669</guid>
		<description>English 101 teaches how to distinguish opinion versus fact. Just because you believe it to be true doesn&#039;t make it fact. 

Judgment calls no matter how much evidence you have are always opinion. We stated 0 (zero) versus 72 as our evidence on what we are basing our opinion on. Jim stated 8 versus 40 years (leaving out the fact that the last decade has been the most advances in the field and technology thereby equalizing some of the 40 versus 8. Jim repeats it more adamantly and ignores our statements of fact on which we base our opinion and then calls us &quot;liars&quot;. Nice. 

Thank you ST for letting us address what opinion versus fact is and the basis for all of our opinions.

We are here through your gracious patience and efforts. @};-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>English 101 teaches how to distinguish opinion versus fact. Just because you believe it to be true doesn&#8217;t make it fact. </p>
<p>Judgment calls no matter how much evidence you have are always opinion. We stated 0 (zero) versus 72 as our evidence on what we are basing our opinion on. Jim stated 8 versus 40 years (leaving out the fact that the last decade has been the most advances in the field and technology thereby equalizing some of the 40 versus 8. Jim repeats it more adamantly and ignores our statements of fact on which we base our opinion and then calls us &#8220;liars&#8221;. Nice. </p>
<p>Thank you ST for letting us address what opinion versus fact is and the basis for all of our opinions.</p>
<p>We are here through your gracious patience and efforts. <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_flower.gif' alt='&#64;&#125;&#59;&#45;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#64;&#125;&#59;&#45;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563658</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563658</guid>
		<description>Oh my PCD! You said &quot;good Lord!&quot; You must be one of those hideous right wing Bible thumpers! How dhast you say such a thing! =))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my PCD! You said &#8220;good Lord!&#8221; You must be one of those hideous right wing Bible thumpers! How dhast you say such a thing! <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563573</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563573</guid>
		<description>When you manage to come up with something other than opinion stated as fact, and back that up with references Jim, then you will be worth paying attention to. Until then, all your complaints are just more liberal whining and obsfucation. When you address the fact that the amendment in Missouri is a back door run around that guarantees the right to perform human cloning, not guarantee the ability to do ESC, they you may be worth debating. When you address the fact that you seem to see no problem in government continuing to increase the amount of money it spends regardless of ethical issues or practical things like potential for progress in a reasonable timeframe, instead of hiding behind insults, then perhaps there will be some room for discussion. When you decide to not call anyone who doesn&#039;t automatically want to spend tons of taxpayers money on dubious research (both ethically and benefit wise) a Bible thumper, that is, decide to debate the issues honestly and not mischaracterize your opponents as stereotypes, then you might be worth paying attention to. These are the issues you&#039;re dodging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you manage to come up with something other than opinion stated as fact, and back that up with references Jim, then you will be worth paying attention to. Until then, all your complaints are just more liberal whining and obsfucation. When you address the fact that the amendment in Missouri is a back door run around that guarantees the right to perform human cloning, not guarantee the ability to do ESC, they you may be worth debating. When you address the fact that you seem to see no problem in government continuing to increase the amount of money it spends regardless of ethical issues or practical things like potential for progress in a reasonable timeframe, instead of hiding behind insults, then perhaps there will be some room for discussion. When you decide to not call anyone who doesn&#8217;t automatically want to spend tons of taxpayers money on dubious research (both ethically and benefit wise) a Bible thumper, that is, decide to debate the issues honestly and not mischaracterize your opponents as stereotypes, then you might be worth paying attention to. These are the issues you&#8217;re dodging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563564</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563564</guid>
		<description>Jim S,

Don&#039;t let the hit you where the good Lord split you on your way out.

Amendment 2 writes into the Missouri Constitution the right to clone humans.  Be honest for a change.  You haven&#039;t been here and liars are found out quickly here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim S,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let the hit you where the good Lord split you on your way out.</p>
<p>Amendment 2 writes into the Missouri Constitution the right to clone humans.  Be honest for a change.  You haven&#8217;t been here and liars are found out quickly here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563563</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563563</guid>
		<description>Ok, everyone, debate the ISSUES not each other&#039;s personalities or this thread will be closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, everyone, debate the ISSUES not each other&#8217;s personalities or this thread will be closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563561</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563561</guid>
		<description>This is my last post because frankly, neither one of you are worth wasting any more of my time. Is ESC illegal now? No. Has the Republican party attempted to make it illegal at both the federal and state levels? Yes. In fact the main reason for Missouri Amendment 2 which Talent opposes is that his Republican allies in the state legislature have tried every year for the last six years to make it illegal. There are private research institutions who won&#039;t invest any more money in Missouri to expand their facilities because of the threat of those facilities suddenly becoming illegal. There are researchers who will not come to these facilities to work because they could move, get established and suddenly not be able to do their work. The constant threat of it being rendered illegal at the federal level has caused more development to take place overseas instead of the U.S.

Bakky, what I said is not simply an opinion. This is the debating tactic of the ignorant right, to claim that if a fact or basic logical argument is put forth, claim it&#039;s just an opinion. It&#039;s not simply my opinion. Refute it logically or admit that you&#039;re wrong, one or the other. Don&#039;t just claim it&#039;s only one person&#039;s opinion. But that would require logic, something neither you nor Severian are capable of comprehending as you&#039;ve both proven over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my last post because frankly, neither one of you are worth wasting any more of my time. Is ESC illegal now? No. Has the Republican party attempted to make it illegal at both the federal and state levels? Yes. In fact the main reason for Missouri Amendment 2 which Talent opposes is that his Republican allies in the state legislature have tried every year for the last six years to make it illegal. There are private research institutions who won&#8217;t invest any more money in Missouri to expand their facilities because of the threat of those facilities suddenly becoming illegal. There are researchers who will not come to these facilities to work because they could move, get established and suddenly not be able to do their work. The constant threat of it being rendered illegal at the federal level has caused more development to take place overseas instead of the U.S.</p>
<p>Bakky, what I said is not simply an opinion. This is the debating tactic of the ignorant right, to claim that if a fact or basic logical argument is put forth, claim it&#8217;s just an opinion. It&#8217;s not simply my opinion. Refute it logically or admit that you&#8217;re wrong, one or the other. Don&#8217;t just claim it&#8217;s only one person&#8217;s opinion. But that would require logic, something neither you nor Severian are capable of comprehending as you&#8217;ve both proven over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563510</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563510</guid>
		<description>Jim is doing the tried and true debating tactic of attempting to move the argument sideways Bak. Deflect away from the topic at hand, so you don&#039;t have to justify or provide a rational explanation of your opinion, but rather try and make the debate about the tone of your opponents, how mean they are, etc. It&#039;s part and parcel of what our beloved ST has just blogged about with respect to the MJF &quot;controversy.&quot; It&#039;s common, but it doesn&#039;t play well here, we have seen it too many times, and I think it&#039;s getting less and less effective as more and more people are getting fed up with it. Jim is, at the heart of it, upset that we can parse his arguments to get to the kernel and don&#039;t get blinded by the chaff.

Rather than provide a rationale as to why government should fund a less than promising technology (liberals are always willing to spend other people&#039;s money), or why valid ethical concerns (valid to more than just religious zealots) should be ignored, he instead tries to make this about how mean his opponents in the argument are.

Well, Jim, here&#039;s a free bit of advice for you. Stop sitting there with a runny nose complaining about how the evil Republicans won&#039;t pay for government to wipe it for you, and get off your butt and wipe it yourself. Take some time and money, do some research, and find out which universities are leading the way in ESC research. Give them some money, create a non-profit (only please, don&#039;t take 80% of the till for &quot;administration&quot; as so many &quot;charities&quot; do), setup a dot org web site, push it, get the blogs (if you&#039;re serious and sincere about it, both right and left blogs will support it), collect donations, manage them, find a couple or three researchers and support them, and above all monitor their progress to make sure they aren&#039;t just blowing your money, look for results. In other words, take responsibility for it yourself if you want it done, that&#039;s the beauty of this country, self-starters are respected here, and no one will try and stop you, remember, &lt;strong&gt;ESC research is not illegal.&lt;/strong&gt;

I suspect that Jim prefers the &quot;liberal&quot; way, show you care by spending other people&#039;s money, but wouldn&#039;t raise a finger to do it on his own. You can surprise us Jim, and earn our respect, by doing something other than complaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim is doing the tried and true debating tactic of attempting to move the argument sideways Bak. Deflect away from the topic at hand, so you don&#8217;t have to justify or provide a rational explanation of your opinion, but rather try and make the debate about the tone of your opponents, how mean they are, etc. It&#8217;s part and parcel of what our beloved ST has just blogged about with respect to the MJF &#8220;controversy.&#8221; It&#8217;s common, but it doesn&#8217;t play well here, we have seen it too many times, and I think it&#8217;s getting less and less effective as more and more people are getting fed up with it. Jim is, at the heart of it, upset that we can parse his arguments to get to the kernel and don&#8217;t get blinded by the chaff.</p>
<p>Rather than provide a rationale as to why government should fund a less than promising technology (liberals are always willing to spend other people&#8217;s money), or why valid ethical concerns (valid to more than just religious zealots) should be ignored, he instead tries to make this about how mean his opponents in the argument are.</p>
<p>Well, Jim, here&#8217;s a free bit of advice for you. Stop sitting there with a runny nose complaining about how the evil Republicans won&#8217;t pay for government to wipe it for you, and get off your butt and wipe it yourself. Take some time and money, do some research, and find out which universities are leading the way in ESC research. Give them some money, create a non-profit (only please, don&#8217;t take 80% of the till for &#8220;administration&#8221; as so many &#8220;charities&#8221; do), setup a dot org web site, push it, get the blogs (if you&#8217;re serious and sincere about it, both right and left blogs will support it), collect donations, manage them, find a couple or three researchers and support them, and above all monitor their progress to make sure they aren&#8217;t just blowing your money, look for results. In other words, take responsibility for it yourself if you want it done, that&#8217;s the beauty of this country, self-starters are respected here, and no one will try and stop you, remember, <strong>ESC research is not illegal.</strong></p>
<p>I suspect that Jim prefers the &#8220;liberal&#8221; way, show you care by spending other people&#8217;s money, but wouldn&#8217;t raise a finger to do it on his own. You can surprise us Jim, and earn our respect, by doing something other than complaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563504</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563504</guid>
		<description>Jim wrote an opinion, &quot;&lt;em&gt;Just because something that has been being researched for 40 years has results that aren&#039;t matched by something that has only been being researched for 8 years it does not prove anything about the long term potential of the one that hasn&#039;t been being studied as long.&lt;/em&gt;

Jim. That is your opinion. There is NO WAY to claim that Sev lied. Sev wrote an opinion. I agree with him and so do people in the field. The condescension and accusation of lying isn&#039;t necessary and doesn&#039;t help the debate.

Jim accused, &quot;&lt;em&gt;You and Severian are both lying through your little teeth and you both know it. &lt;/em&gt;&quot;

No. We are stating an opinion just like you are.

Jim cast aspersions writing, &quot;&lt;em&gt;Severian isn&#039;t bright enough to ...&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

Is that necessary Jim? I&#039;m thinking you are not very nice. 

Jim asserted, &quot;&lt;em&gt;The fact that the majority of people opposing ESC oppose it because of their religiously based opposition to abortion is one that everyone knows,&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

That&#039;s what the press (drive-by legacy media) says. Sev and I are two examples of people and there are other people I know who aren&#039;t basing their opposition on religious reasons. &lt;strong&gt;But it isn&#039;t a strong argument for you to dismiss religious people either&lt;/strong&gt;. 

Jim wrote, &quot;&lt;em&gt;I haven&#039;t seen anything posted by you or Bakky that indicates any thoughts&lt;/em&gt;&quot; 

Well..... are you deserving of more? You have repeated your 8 year versus 40 year message. But mostly called people liars and made disparaging remarks. 

Jim without looking in the mirror wrote, &quot;&lt;em&gt;Prove me wrong by keeping a civil discourse instead of lying about people who point out your logical fallacies.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

&lt;strong&gt;My post was more civil than yours I believe. &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim wrote an opinion, &#8220;<em>Just because something that has been being researched for 40 years has results that aren&#8217;t matched by something that has only been being researched for 8 years it does not prove anything about the long term potential of the one that hasn&#8217;t been being studied as long.</em></p>
<p>Jim. That is your opinion. There is NO WAY to claim that Sev lied. Sev wrote an opinion. I agree with him and so do people in the field. The condescension and accusation of lying isn&#8217;t necessary and doesn&#8217;t help the debate.</p>
<p>Jim accused, &#8220;<em>You and Severian are both lying through your little teeth and you both know it. </em>&#8221;</p>
<p>No. We are stating an opinion just like you are.</p>
<p>Jim cast aspersions writing, &#8220;<em>Severian isn&#8217;t bright enough to &#8230;</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that necessary Jim? I&#8217;m thinking you are not very nice. </p>
<p>Jim asserted, &#8220;<em>The fact that the majority of people opposing ESC oppose it because of their religiously based opposition to abortion is one that everyone knows,</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what the press (drive-by legacy media) says. Sev and I are two examples of people and there are other people I know who aren&#8217;t basing their opposition on religious reasons. <strong>But it isn&#8217;t a strong argument for you to dismiss religious people either</strong>. </p>
<p>Jim wrote, &#8220;<em>I haven&#8217;t seen anything posted by you or Bakky that indicates any thoughts</em>&#8221; </p>
<p>Well&#8230;.. are you deserving of more? You have repeated your 8 year versus 40 year message. But mostly called people liars and made disparaging remarks. </p>
<p>Jim without looking in the mirror wrote, &#8220;<em>Prove me wrong by keeping a civil discourse instead of lying about people who point out your logical fallacies.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>My post was more civil than yours I believe. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563413</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563413</guid>
		<description>BTW Jim, the things that come shining thru from your latest rant are that you are a bigot who hates religious people, particularly Christians, and that you believe everything should be done by government not by the private sector. I&#039;m an atheist, and I don&#039;t even begin to approach your level of vitriol or hatred for Christians, you&#039;ve got a real bigoted intolerance problem there. And don&#039;t go breaking your arm patting  yourself on the back for being sensitive and caring enough to spend every last dollar that&#039;s not your own to solve a problem. There&#039;s no limit to the amount of other people&#039;s money you&#039;re willing to spend in order to feel good about yourself. 

Got it, understand, thanks for the glimpse into the mind of the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW Jim, the things that come shining thru from your latest rant are that you are a bigot who hates religious people, particularly Christians, and that you believe everything should be done by government not by the private sector. I&#8217;m an atheist, and I don&#8217;t even begin to approach your level of vitriol or hatred for Christians, you&#8217;ve got a real bigoted intolerance problem there. And don&#8217;t go breaking your arm patting  yourself on the back for being sensitive and caring enough to spend every last dollar that&#8217;s not your own to solve a problem. There&#8217;s no limit to the amount of other people&#8217;s money you&#8217;re willing to spend in order to feel good about yourself. </p>
<p>Got it, understand, thanks for the glimpse into the mind of the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563385</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563385</guid>
		<description>er, altar, not enough coffee yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er, altar, not enough coffee yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-563383</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-563383</guid>
		<description>Jim S - :((:((:((:((:((

More BS Jim, more useless drivel, more whining about everyone else, no defense of spending tons of government money on a technique that is not yielding promising results, more feeling that only government can do anything, yada yada yada yada...:-@:-@:-@

Go back to your alter of big government, read a few global warming fantasies, you&#039;ll be feeling right as rain in no time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim S &#8211; <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_cry.gif' alt='&#58;&#40;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='22' height='18' title='&#58;&#40;&#40;' /><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_cry.gif' alt='&#58;&#40;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='22' height='18' title='&#58;&#40;&#40;' /><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_cry.gif' alt='&#58;&#40;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='22' height='18' title='&#58;&#40;&#40;' /><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_cry.gif' alt='&#58;&#40;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='22' height='18' title='&#58;&#40;&#40;' /><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_cry.gif' alt='&#58;&#40;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='22' height='18' title='&#58;&#40;&#40;' /></p>
<p>More BS Jim, more useless drivel, more whining about everyone else, no defense of spending tons of government money on a technique that is not yielding promising results, more feeling that only government can do anything, yada yada yada yada&#8230;<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_talktohand.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#64;' class='wp-smiley' width='31' height='16' title='&#58;&#45;&#64;' /><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_talktohand.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#64;' class='wp-smiley' width='31' height='16' title='&#58;&#45;&#64;' /><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_talktohand.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#64;' class='wp-smiley' width='31' height='16' title='&#58;&#45;&#64;' /></p>
<p>Go back to your alter of big government, read a few global warming fantasies, you&#8217;ll be feeling right as rain in no time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-562636</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 04:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-562636</guid>
		<description>Baklava, if you wish to defend Severian&#039;s lies try again. Go away and take some courses in logic and the scientific method and try again. Just because something that has been being researched for 40 years has results that aren&#039;t matched by something that has only been being researched for 8 years it does not prove anything about the long term potential of the one that hasn&#039;t been being studied as long. That is the truth. You and Severian are both lying through your little teeth and you both know it. Severian isn&#039;t bright enough to actually do any competent science or he would have recognized the logical fallacy that he is taking part in promoting. The fact that the majority of people opposing ESC oppose it because of their religiously based opposition to abortion is one that everyone knows, but you deny it in order to defend the BS you spew. In other words, you lie about this too. Do you tell the truth about anything? If you do it couldn&#039;t be proved by the posts either of you have made here.

Severian, if you&#039;re a scientist you are quite probably the worst one getting a paycheck for it in the U.S. But of course given the other lies you post I doubt you are one. You certainly don&#039;t post anything that implies even indirectly any comprehension of basic logic. You BS us with &quot;I notice that you whine and cry, but don&#039;t provide any solid info on the wonderful benefits shown by embryonic stem cells.&quot;. In fact what I did was reasonably point out that you can&#039;t expect results to already exist from a field that we&#039;ve barely begun to research. You, of course, with your staggeringly brilliant scientific mind couldn&#039;t understand that. Since you can&#039;t understand that I think anyone with a brain would realize that you are not in fact a real scientist who comprehends anything about the scientific method or the nature of scientific research. Since you lied about that I am forced to assume that you&#039;re lying about everything else as well. I haven&#039;t seen anything posted by you or Bakky that indicates any thoughts outside the bounds defined by James Dobson, the RNC and Rush Limbaugh so forgive me if I assume that you are in fact &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; an atheist but are in fact a Bible thumper because you show the same level of intelligence. Don&#039;t like what I said? Tough. Prove me wrong by keeping a civil discourse instead of lying about people who point out your logical fallacies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baklava, if you wish to defend Severian&#8217;s lies try again. Go away and take some courses in logic and the scientific method and try again. Just because something that has been being researched for 40 years has results that aren&#8217;t matched by something that has only been being researched for 8 years it does not prove anything about the long term potential of the one that hasn&#8217;t been being studied as long. That is the truth. You and Severian are both lying through your little teeth and you both know it. Severian isn&#8217;t bright enough to actually do any competent science or he would have recognized the logical fallacy that he is taking part in promoting. The fact that the majority of people opposing ESC oppose it because of their religiously based opposition to abortion is one that everyone knows, but you deny it in order to defend the BS you spew. In other words, you lie about this too. Do you tell the truth about anything? If you do it couldn&#8217;t be proved by the posts either of you have made here.</p>
<p>Severian, if you&#8217;re a scientist you are quite probably the worst one getting a paycheck for it in the U.S. But of course given the other lies you post I doubt you are one. You certainly don&#8217;t post anything that implies even indirectly any comprehension of basic logic. You BS us with &#8220;I notice that you whine and cry, but don&#8217;t provide any solid info on the wonderful benefits shown by embryonic stem cells.&#8221;. In fact what I did was reasonably point out that you can&#8217;t expect results to already exist from a field that we&#8217;ve barely begun to research. You, of course, with your staggeringly brilliant scientific mind couldn&#8217;t understand that. Since you can&#8217;t understand that I think anyone with a brain would realize that you are not in fact a real scientist who comprehends anything about the scientific method or the nature of scientific research. Since you lied about that I am forced to assume that you&#8217;re lying about everything else as well. I haven&#8217;t seen anything posted by you or Bakky that indicates any thoughts outside the bounds defined by James Dobson, the RNC and Rush Limbaugh so forgive me if I assume that you are in fact <strong>not</strong> an atheist but are in fact a Bible thumper because you show the same level of intelligence. Don&#8217;t like what I said? Tough. Prove me wrong by keeping a civil discourse instead of lying about people who point out your logical fallacies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-562201</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-562201</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;ve got an idea. I am just positive I can cure just about anything by having nekid women rub all over me. It&#039;s not been studied very long, so it must have tons of unseen potential. I need $100,000,000 in government grants to adequately study this. What? You don&#039;t want to fund it?! What are you, some moralistic, uptight reiigious fanatic! I&#039;ll make a commercial, showing me with this hideous problem that makes part of my anatomy just rigid as can be, and it won&#039;t go back to normal until I get the nekid women treatment. How dare you call me an opportunist! How dare you say I&#039;m misleading and manipulating, have you no heart? Are you all just selfish, vicious, and heartless people with no soul? How can you stand in the way of this promising research and still look in the mirror at yourselves and sleep at nights?!?! 

8-&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;ve got an idea. I am just positive I can cure just about anything by having nekid women rub all over me. It&#8217;s not been studied very long, so it must have tons of unseen potential. I need $100,000,000 in government grants to adequately study this. What? You don&#8217;t want to fund it?! What are you, some moralistic, uptight reiigious fanatic! I&#8217;ll make a commercial, showing me with this hideous problem that makes part of my anatomy just rigid as can be, and it won&#8217;t go back to normal until I get the nekid women treatment. How dare you call me an opportunist! How dare you say I&#8217;m misleading and manipulating, have you no heart? Are you all just selfish, vicious, and heartless people with no soul? How can you stand in the way of this promising research and still look in the mirror at yourselves and sleep at nights?!?! </p>
<p><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_eyeroll.gif' alt='&#56;&#45;&#124;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#56;&#45;&#124;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-562182</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/10/23/missouris-jim-talent-your-typical-heartless-and-cruel-conservative/#comment-562182</guid>
		<description>Gee Jim, where&#039;s that crybaby icon when you need it, ah there it is - :((

Why is it that all the pseudo-science pushers are all in the computer field? You, a guy named Aghast, the modelers who push global warming nonsense packaged as science? I honestly think that computer science teaches too much reliance on mental masturbation and looped code and not enough on reality and practical aspects. Too many models and processes that are divorced from reality. 

If we cut through all your BS, we see the traditional leftist rant. Pharmaceutical companies are evil short term profit motive bastards who won&#039;t work on a cure if they can&#039;t sell a drug (I bet you&#039;re one of the types who believes that they have a cure for AIDS but are evilly repressing it so they can sell tons of antiviral meds). Republicans and their supporters are all religious fanatics who stomp on science for fun and because Jesus told them to. It&#039;s governments job to spend billions on things that offer little to no benefit just because money grows on taxpayers, yada yada yada...:-@:-@:-@

For your information, I personally have no moral or ethical problem with embryonic stem cells. I know it must shock you, but there are a lot of Republicans and conservatives like me. I&#039;m an atheist, not a Bible thumper, but I also happen to think that people who do have strong ethical problems shouldn&#039;t just be thrown under the bus. I just happen to know a thing or three about real science, since that&#039;s how I make my living, and don&#039;t think the government is made of money to piss down a hole. 

I notice that you whine and cry, but don&#039;t provide any solid info on the wonderful benefits shown by embryonic stem cells. And besides the evil pharmacutical companies, there are plenty of private funded organizations and trusts, liberal as hell, and tons of colleges that can do this research and can fund it without it coming out of my taxes. But then, to people like you, government is the alpha and the omega, you worship government the same way others do God. Embryonic stem cell research is not illegal, get that, NOT ILLEGAL. So, go back to school, finish that biochem or whatever degree and knock youself out. Or would you have to sacrifice that good paying computer job, and you&#039;d rather the government tax the hell out of someone else to pay for it. 

Half truths, distortions, misrepresentations, and lies, as we&#039;ve come to expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Jim, where&#8217;s that crybaby icon when you need it, ah there it is &#8211; <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_cry.gif' alt='&#58;&#40;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='22' height='18' title='&#58;&#40;&#40;' /></p>
<p>Why is it that all the pseudo-science pushers are all in the computer field? You, a guy named Aghast, the modelers who push global warming nonsense packaged as science? I honestly think that computer science teaches too much reliance on mental masturbation and looped code and not enough on reality and practical aspects. Too many models and processes that are divorced from reality. </p>
<p>If we cut through all your BS, we see the traditional leftist rant. Pharmaceutical companies are evil short term profit motive bastards who won&#8217;t work on a cure if they can&#8217;t sell a drug (I bet you&#8217;re one of the types who believes that they have a cure for AIDS but are evilly repressing it so they can sell tons of antiviral meds). Republicans and their supporters are all religious fanatics who stomp on science for fun and because Jesus told them to. It&#8217;s governments job to spend billions on things that offer little to no benefit just because money grows on taxpayers, yada yada yada&#8230;<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_talktohand.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#64;' class='wp-smiley' width='31' height='16' title='&#58;&#45;&#64;' /><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_talktohand.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#64;' class='wp-smiley' width='31' height='16' title='&#58;&#45;&#64;' /><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_talktohand.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#64;' class='wp-smiley' width='31' height='16' title='&#58;&#45;&#64;' /></p>
<p>For your information, I personally have no moral or ethical problem with embryonic stem cells. I know it must shock you, but there are a lot of Republicans and conservatives like me. I&#8217;m an atheist, not a Bible thumper, but I also happen to think that people who do have strong ethical problems shouldn&#8217;t just be thrown under the bus. I just happen to know a thing or three about real science, since that&#8217;s how I make my living, and don&#8217;t think the government is made of money to piss down a hole. </p>
<p>I notice that you whine and cry, but don&#8217;t provide any solid info on the wonderful benefits shown by embryonic stem cells. And besides the evil pharmacutical companies, there are plenty of private funded organizations and trusts, liberal as hell, and tons of colleges that can do this research and can fund it without it coming out of my taxes. But then, to people like you, government is the alpha and the omega, you worship government the same way others do God. Embryonic stem cell research is not illegal, get that, NOT ILLEGAL. So, go back to school, finish that biochem or whatever degree and knock youself out. Or would you have to sacrifice that good paying computer job, and you&#8217;d rather the government tax the hell out of someone else to pay for it. </p>
<p>Half truths, distortions, misrepresentations, and lies, as we&#8217;ve come to expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
