Comments on: UK: Doctors urge ‘active euthanasia’ for disabled babies

By: Marshall Art

Marshall Art — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:29:31 +0000

I saw this last night but was too incensed to post a civil comment. This is the most contemptable thing I’ve ever heard. You know, that defense of the innocent excuse used by those who’ve killed abortion doctors will make perfect sense now. Some aren’t prepared to say that abortion is murder. Even Dennis Prager won’t. There’s no doubt here. This would be murder. No. This IS murder.

By: Lorica

Lorica — Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:45:43 +0000

Whatever it takes not to be inconvienced. It amazes me how these guys all say it is out of compassion. How is it compassionate to murder innocent children?? Just continues to show how evil the agenda is of some on the left. – Lorica

By: David S.

David S. — Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:20:24 +0000

Libertarianobservre says:

“I’m very sad that I’ve lived long enough to see this. The only thing left to do is to pray. A lot.”

This hurts my heart as well. I couldn’t agree with you more. As a young boy and teenager I grew up with a sister that was profoundly retarded from shortly after birth when she had a strong reaction to an immuinization.

Everyone of of my family members were involved in caring for my sister and I learned valuable lessons from my very “disabled” sister. I learned the importance of family and the value of life. I learned that life, at times, is not fair. I learned that in spite of hardships, families pull together and make the most of what they are given. They do this with a foundation of love and acceptance. These were just some of the valuable lessons learned early that have often sustained me in later life.

Thank you Cheryl Ann, and may God continue to bless your memory.

By: Gina Cobb

Gina Cobb — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:56:17 +0000

Thank you for your strong voice on this issue! I want to mention that the post on this subject at my website was written by Dr. Melissa Clouthier, who was guest blogging at my website this weekend. She brings her own personal experience to bear, along with her intelligence, common sense and compassion.

It is bizarre and sad to me that anybody is even thinking about how to take the lives of children after they have already been born. One of their justifications is that this may reduce late-term abortions — but by replacing them with active killing of babies who are even older, and whose nervous systems are even more developed. Somehow that doesn’t seem like an improvement.

By: I. M. Neiman

I. M. Neiman — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:47:00 +0000

It was inevitable! Once you can kill a baby in the womb (abortion), condone assisted suicide and sanction euthansia then there is nothing to stop society from taking the next step and eventually, social euthansia of all undesireables. If you can commit one evil and society calls it good, then the next and worse evil is just a tiny step!

By: libertarianobserver

libertarianobserver — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:39:35 +0000

I’m very sad that I’ve lived long enough to see this. The only thing left to do is to pray. A lot.

By: Bindare4u

Bindare4u — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:39:57 +0000

This is coming from a country that believes it is morally superior to the USA because they are against the death penalty for vicious criminals but will consider murdering helpless babies because the babies are not perfect. It is only a matter of time before post-pregnancy abortions (executions) become legal and common.

By: Don Singleton

Don Singleton — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:25:59 +0000

Active Euthanasia

If we failed to abort them in the womb, kill them in the nursery. If you are considering this your ethics definitely need a review