<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems want to identify pork sponsors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wake up America</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-589719</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake up America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-589719</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lets Get Ready to Rummmmmmbbble&lt;/strong&gt;

So.... she has left her party with two options... either she gets her way in her first decision as house speaker and puts a crook in the position, OR she loses her first battle with her own party, which is more than just a possibility. Nice start huh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lets Get Ready to Rummmmmmbbble</strong></p>
<p>So&#8230;. she has left her party with two options&#8230; either she gets her way in her first decision as house speaker and puts a crook in the position, OR she loses her first battle with her own party, which is more than just a possibility. Nice start huh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tidbits And Treasures</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-589522</link>
		<dc:creator>Tidbits And Treasures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-589522</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tuesday Rounup posts&lt;/strong&gt;

These are some great posts this morning; well worth your reading! Learn about your congress.

   1. Sister Toljah - Dems want to identify pork sponsors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tuesday Rounup posts</strong></p>
<p>These are some great posts this morning; well worth your reading! Learn about your congress.</p>
<p>   1. Sister Toljah &#8211; Dems want to identify pork sponsors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense Political Thought &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Welcome to the jungle!</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-589504</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense Political Thought &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Welcome to the jungle!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-589504</guid>
		<description>[...] But, as Sister Toldjah noted, Mr Murtha has been a long time opponent of ethics reform, and not only opposes &#8220;earmarks&#8221; reform but is one of the bigger Democratic beneficiaries of porcine spending, something he does not want to change. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But, as Sister Toldjah noted, Mr Murtha has been a long time opponent of ethics reform, and not only opposes &#8220;earmarks&#8221; reform but is one of the bigger Democratic beneficiaries of porcine spending, something he does not want to change. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thisainthell.us Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Draining the swamp</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-589431</link>
		<dc:creator>thisainthell.us Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Draining the swamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-589431</guid>
		<description>[...] Sister Toldya and Flopping AcesÂ are beating the snot out of Nancy Pelosi this morning. I can&#8217;t even try to compete with these two excellent bloggers on this subject. But please read. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sister Toldya and Flopping AcesÂ are beating the snot out of Nancy Pelosi this morning. I can&#8217;t even try to compete with these two excellent bloggers on this subject. But please read. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Ross @ Journal</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-589346</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Ross @ Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-589346</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The No Zone&lt;/strong&gt;

Democrats claim they want energy independence, but their strategy is nonsensical, to say the least. Their so-called strategy? I encourage you to read their position paper because I&#039;m not making this stuff up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The No Zone</strong></p>
<p>Democrats claim they want energy independence, but their strategy is nonsensical, to say the least. Their so-called strategy? I encourage you to read their position paper because I&#8217;m not making this stuff up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-589231</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-589231</guid>
		<description>Things in the capitol are becoming increasingly distressing.  The left is sleazy, the right is sleazy.  Now they are trying to promote &#039;amnesty by any other name&#039; Martinez to head the RNC!

Remember when only one of the parties was the liberal one?  It seems so long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things in the capitol are becoming increasingly distressing.  The left is sleazy, the right is sleazy.  Now they are trying to promote &#8216;amnesty by any other name&#8217; Martinez to head the RNC!</p>
<p>Remember when only one of the parties was the liberal one?  It seems so long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bang Hunter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-589105</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bang Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-589105</guid>
		<description>&quot;....Representative Murtha was unavalaible for House hearings on &quot;Earmarks&quot; before the Finance commitee, since he was subpeoned to appear as a witness in front of the House &quot;industry profiteering&quot; committee, which is fortunate since the first Senator to be grilled is Nancy Pelosi (D,CA), his boss.....In other news....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;.Representative Murtha was unavalaible for House hearings on &#8220;Earmarks&#8221; before the Finance commitee, since he was subpeoned to appear as a witness in front of the House &#8220;industry profiteering&#8221; committee, which is fortunate since the first Senator to be grilled is Nancy Pelosi (D,CA), his boss&#8230;..In other news&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pelosi Doing Her Part To Fill That Swamp</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-589072</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pelosi Doing Her Part To Fill That Swamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-589072</guid>
		<description>[...] Sister Toldjah [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sister Toldjah [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-588934</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 01:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-588934</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pelosi Backs Murtha For House Majority Leader&lt;/strong&gt;

Can you honestly say you&#039;re surprised?  I&#039;m not:

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), in line to become Speaker in January, is throwing her support to Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) in the race for Majority Leader, a move that will be an early test of her infl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pelosi Backs Murtha For House Majority Leader</strong></p>
<p>Can you honestly say you&#8217;re surprised?  I&#8217;m not:</p>
<p>Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), in line to become Speaker in January, is throwing her support to Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) in the race for Majority Leader, a move that will be an early test of her infl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake up America</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-588902</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake up America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-588902</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Withdraw NOW... Cut and Run.&lt;/strong&gt;

Well why don&#039;t you proclaim just as loudly the need to leave THIS country then? After all, those numbers above are people within our country killing each other.... are WE in the midst of a civil war also??????
Get a little perspective folks and whil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Withdraw NOW&#8230; Cut and Run.</strong></p>
<p>Well why don&#8217;t you proclaim just as loudly the need to leave THIS country then? After all, those numbers above are people within our country killing each other&#8230;. are WE in the midst of a civil war also??????<br />
Get a little perspective folks and whil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-588851</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-588851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dana.  There is a difference between Dem leaders&#039;s earmarks cited in the linked article and those that are ANONYMOUS.  If you can&#039;t put your name on it, or it is slipped in at the last minute, something smells. 

From the USA Today article
&lt;em&gt;House Republican leaders adopted a disclosure rule in September, but no earmark sponsors have been identified under the rule because it effectively exempted bills that dictate spending for 2007.&lt;/em&gt; 

This is indefensible.  They basically gave themselves one last round of pork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Dana.  There is a difference between Dem leaders&#8217;s earmarks cited in the linked article and those that are ANONYMOUS.  If you can&#8217;t put your name on it, or it is slipped in at the last minute, something smells. </p>
<p>From the USA Today article<br />
<em>House Republican leaders adopted a disclosure rule in September, but no earmark sponsors have been identified under the rule because it effectively exempted bills that dictate spending for 2007.</em> </p>
<p>This is indefensible.  They basically gave themselves one last round of pork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/comment-page-1/#comment-588629</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/13/dems-want-to-identify-pork-sponsors/#comment-588629</guid>
		<description>Hey, if the Democrats actualy want to reduce spending, and have said that they will, I&#039;m perfectly willing to give them a chance.  And if they actually do so, I&#039;ll give them their props.

But I wouldn&#039;t bet an empty Mountain Dew can that I&#039;ll actually have to do that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if the Democrats actualy want to reduce spending, and have said that they will, I&#8217;m perfectly willing to give them a chance.  And if they actually do so, I&#8217;ll give them their props.</p>
<p>But I wouldn&#8217;t bet an empty Mountain Dew can that I&#8217;ll actually have to do that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
