Comments on: Supremes to NYTimes: Gov’t should be allowed to review your phone records

By: Steve Skubinna

Steve Skubinna — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:33:30 +0000

Does this mean that journalists are covered by the same Constitution the rest of us live under? Say it ain’t so! What’s next, dismantling their pedestals?

By: Webloggin

Webloggin — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:19:42 +0000

The New York Times Fails In Effort To Block Justice Department Investigation

Where is the line drawn between informing the public and causing them harm? Thankfully we are about to learn the answer to that question courtesy of the man who was going to bring the New York Times “Fitzmas” just a short while back.

…

By: Dana

Dana — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:29:04 +0000

Sis, it’s spelled Bu$hCo; you’ve got to include the dollar sign. Didn’t you get the memo?

By: Marshall Art

Marshall Art — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:33:59 +0000

This is great news, particularly the unanimous decision by the Supremes. If all that comes of this is that there will be no more leaks, I’d be fairly happy. But it would be nice to find and punish the perpetrators of these seditious acts.

By: TedintheShed

TedintheShed — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:14:05 +0000

Now that they got a hold of the phone records, I sure hope that if there are any indicators as to who leaked this information those that did get prosecuted for high treason.

The abundance of leaks, especially those for political conveneience, is out of control.