
What the hell? Via AP:
WASHINGTON – The Federal Election Commission on Thursday took steps to encourage politicians and contributors to report their own possible violations of campaign finance laws by offering them significantly reduced fines.
Commission officials said the number of self-reported violations has increased recently, prompting the need for a specific policy that spells out how the FEC will dispose of such cases.
“This is not meant to be a get out of jail free card,” said Commissioner Ellen Weintraub. “If you’re racing to the FEC three steps in front of the guy who’s got the complaint in his hand against you, this policy is probably not for you.”
Before fully adopting the policy, the commission has asked for public comment on the proposal by Jan. 29.
The proposal contains two penalty recommendations for violators who voluntarily blow the whistle on themselves. One would reduce civil penalties by 50 to 75 percent of standard fines, depending on the steps taken to report and correct the violation. Another would set the reduction at 50 percent, but give the commission leeway to lower or increase the discount based on mitigating factors.
“What this policy focuses on are people who come in and tell us things that we would not otherwise know,” Weintraub said.
Right! I’m sure at a time where campaign violations are used against a political opponent with a vengeance and will continue to do so, that politicans are going to be “encouraged” more now to step forth and admit they violated campaign laws, because their fines won’t be as big. Oh, and I don’t buy the bit in the article about “the number of self-reported violations has increased recently” because if they had, there would be no need to provide incentive to do so.
Is there anyone with a functioning brain at the FEC these days?
RSS feed for comments on this post.
You have got to be kidding!
ST, I do believe you are correct in your question of functioning brains.
It actually does make some sense: the regulations can be so screwed up that someone could have a technical violation or something caused by a poorly trained campaign worker. You say, “We found this, and are reporting it, and have taken X steps to prevent a such from happening again.”
This way people think you are honest, simply had a mistake made, corrected it internally, and reported it properly. It’s hard for an opponent to make much of an issue of that.
Look at it this way: if George Bush had admitted to his ancient history DUI arrest back when he said he had stopped drinking because alcohol was ruining his life, would the Democrats have been able to use it as an October surprise? My guess is that he’d have won the popular vote as well, which was what the polls showed was going to happen right up until the revelation.