<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FEC to politicians: Feel free to report yourself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/30/fec-to-politicians-feel-free-to-report-yourself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/30/fec-to-politicians-feel-free-to-report-yourself/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:28:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/30/fec-to-politicians-feel-free-to-report-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-604567</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 13:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/30/fec-to-politicians-feel-free-to-report-yourself/#comment-604567</guid>
		<description>It actually does make some sense: the regulations can be so screwed up that someone could have a technical violation or something caused by a poorly trained campaign worker.  You say, &quot;We found this, and are reporting it, and have taken X steps to prevent a such from happening again.&quot;  

This way people think you are honest, simply had a mistake made, corrected it internally, and reported it properly.  It&#039;s hard for an opponent to make much of an issue of that.

Look at it this way: if George Bush had admitted to his ancient history DUI arrest back when he said he had stopped drinking because alcohol was ruining his life, would the Democrats have been able to use it as an October surprise?  My guess is that he&#039;d have won the popular vote as well, which was what the polls showed was going to happen right up until the revelation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually does make some sense: the regulations can be so screwed up that someone could have a technical violation or something caused by a poorly trained campaign worker.  You say, &#8220;We found this, and are reporting it, and have taken X steps to prevent a such from happening again.&#8221;  </p>
<p>This way people think you are honest, simply had a mistake made, corrected it internally, and reported it properly.  It&#8217;s hard for an opponent to make much of an issue of that.</p>
<p>Look at it this way: if George Bush had admitted to his ancient history DUI arrest back when he said he had stopped drinking because alcohol was ruining his life, would the Democrats have been able to use it as an October surprise?  My guess is that he&#8217;d have won the popular vote as well, which was what the polls showed was going to happen right up until the revelation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa In Texas</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/30/fec-to-politicians-feel-free-to-report-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-603460</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa In Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/30/fec-to-politicians-feel-free-to-report-yourself/#comment-603460</guid>
		<description>You have &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;got&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; to be kidding!
ST, I do believe you are correct in your question of functioning brains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have <em><strong>got</strong></em> to be kidding!<br />
ST, I do believe you are correct in your question of functioning brains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
