<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems determined to repeat &#8216;nam defeat with a defeat in Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:53:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-661327</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/#comment-661327</guid>
		<description>Again, no one is making the Democrats BE specific and making them explain victory or how their plans achieve victory.  Could it be the Democrats are not honest and can not admit they are Defeatocrats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, no one is making the Democrats BE specific and making them explain victory or how their plans achieve victory.  Could it be the Democrats are not honest and can not admit they are Defeatocrats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-661305</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/#comment-661305</guid>
		<description>Just noted the correction in my post - thanks for letting me know :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noted the correction in my post &#8211; thanks for letting me know <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_smiley.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dickerson</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-660403</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dickerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/10/dems-determined-to-repeat-nam-defeat-with-a-defeat-in-iraq/#comment-660403</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking to the piece. A tiny clarification:

You say:

&quot;John Dickerson at Slate thinks that Senator Ted Kennedy is on his own in wanting to &#039;stop the surge&#039; via cutting off war funding. I think on that score, he&#039;s incorrect&quot;

You link to a piece that says Murtha also wants to cut off funds. That very point is in my piece:

&quot;Kennedy may find more allies on the House side. On Sunday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi hinted that Democrats might cut off funding for the troop increase when Bush makes his supplemental budget request to keep the war going. John Murtha, who chairs the defense appropriations committee, where the supplemental would be debated, is planning to hold hearings within a week to pick apart the president&#039;s plan and perhaps put forward his own surge-killing legislation to limit funding and troop levels.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking to the piece. A tiny clarification:</p>
<p>You say:</p>
<p>&#8220;John Dickerson at Slate thinks that Senator Ted Kennedy is on his own in wanting to &#8217;stop the surge&#8217; via cutting off war funding. I think on that score, he&#8217;s incorrect&#8221;</p>
<p>You link to a piece that says Murtha also wants to cut off funds. That very point is in my piece:</p>
<p>&#8220;Kennedy may find more allies on the House side. On Sunday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi hinted that Democrats might cut off funding for the troop increase when Bush makes his supplemental budget request to keep the war going. John Murtha, who chairs the defense appropriations committee, where the supplemental would be debated, is planning to hold hearings within a week to pick apart the president&#8217;s plan and perhaps put forward his own surge-killing legislation to limit funding and troop levels.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
