<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Those &#8220;destroyed Sunni mosques&#8221; were not destroyed afterall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mwalimu Daudi</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-676437</link>
		<dc:creator>Mwalimu Daudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/#comment-676437</guid>
		<description>Our local &quot;newspaper&quot; exclusively uses AP, &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Washington Post&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt; when covering national and international news. Talk about the blind leading the blind!

Thanks to ST and Michelle Malkin for keeping the heat on AP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our local &#8220;newspaper&#8221; exclusively uses AP, <em>New York Times</em>, <em>Washington Post</em> and <em>Los Angeles Times</em> when covering national and international news. Talk about the blind leading the blind!</p>
<p>Thanks to ST and Michelle Malkin for keeping the heat on AP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom TB</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-676425</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/#comment-676425</guid>
		<description>...this just in...unnamed anonymous sources reported that unknown extra-terrestrial vehicles dropped encrypted documents on unspecified places of religious worship announcing the arrival of aliens from a previously recognized planet...stay tuned for up-dates...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;this just in&#8230;unnamed anonymous sources reported that unknown extra-terrestrial vehicles dropped encrypted documents on unspecified places of religious worship announcing the arrival of aliens from a previously recognized planet&#8230;stay tuned for up-dates&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-676358</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/#comment-676358</guid>
		<description>The problem with the AP is that it gives the local Piss-ant rags cover when the liberally biased articles are printed.  No sources? Take it up with AP dear reader.  Editorializing within the article? Take it up with AP.  The reporter is lying/using non-existant evidence or sources?  Take it up with AP.

It just lets your local paper lie to you, yet THEY aren&#039;t the ones lying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the AP is that it gives the local Piss-ant rags cover when the liberally biased articles are printed.  No sources? Take it up with AP dear reader.  Editorializing within the article? Take it up with AP.  The reporter is lying/using non-existant evidence or sources?  Take it up with AP.</p>
<p>It just lets your local paper lie to you, yet THEY aren&#8217;t the ones lying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-676308</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/#comment-676308</guid>
		<description>This:
Everyone not parroting the government establishment liberal point of view is to be trusted.

was supposed to be this:
Everyone &lt;strike&gt;not&lt;/strike&gt; parroting the government establishment liberal point of view is to be trusted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This:<br />
Everyone not parroting the government establishment liberal point of view is to be trusted.</p>
<p>was supposed to be this:<br />
Everyone <strike>not</strike> parroting the government establishment liberal point of view is to be trusted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/comment-page-1/#comment-676301</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/22/those-destroyed-sunni-mosques-were-not-destroyed-afterall/#comment-676301</guid>
		<description>More of the legacy drive by media hoisting their expertise on the American people. Did I tell you that journalists are better at everything (being an officer, architect, historian, climatologist, etc) than everyone else. Now we can add truth teller to that list. Because the drive-by legacy press will give us the true picture right?

Everyone not liberal is to be questioned. Everyone not parroting the government establishment liberal point of view is to be trusted.

ST wrote, &quot;&lt;em&gt;Though we do now know that he does in fact exist, his credibilty is still in question.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

By a bunch of non-peer reviewed wackos like us only!! AP has no questions of credibility that I know of. And most Republicans I would gather are not aware of any questions of credibility with respect to Iraq and Lebanon reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of the legacy drive by media hoisting their expertise on the American people. Did I tell you that journalists are better at everything (being an officer, architect, historian, climatologist, etc) than everyone else. Now we can add truth teller to that list. Because the drive-by legacy press will give us the true picture right?</p>
<p>Everyone not liberal is to be questioned. Everyone not parroting the government establishment liberal point of view is to be trusted.</p>
<p>ST wrote, &#8220;<em>Though we do now know that he does in fact exist, his credibilty is still in question.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>By a bunch of non-peer reviewed wackos like us only!! AP has no questions of credibility that I know of. And most Republicans I would gather are not aware of any questions of credibility with respect to Iraq and Lebanon reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
