<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment thread: The President&#8217;s State of the Union address and the Dem response to it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-682816</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-682816</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reaction To The State Of The Union From Around The Right Side Of The Blogosphere&lt;/strong&gt;

There didn&#039;t seem to be much excitement around the right side of the blogosphere about Bush&#039;s State of the Union speech -- and I mean that literally. There didn&#039;t seem to be a lot of scathing criticism (although the immigration...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reaction To The State Of The Union From Around The Right Side Of The Blogosphere</strong></p>
<p>There didn&#8217;t seem to be much excitement around the right side of the blogosphere about Bush&#8217;s State of the Union speech &#8212; and I mean that literally. There didn&#8217;t seem to be a lot of scathing criticism (although the immigration&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Proctor: Bottom Line Up Front</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-679052</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Proctor: Bottom Line Up Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-679052</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;State of the Union 2007&lt;/strong&gt;

A great tradition of the State of the Union event is the honoring of ordinary individuals in extraordinary circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>State of the Union 2007</strong></p>
<p>A great tradition of the State of the Union event is the honoring of ordinary individuals in extraordinary circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678794</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678794</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reaction To The State Of The Union From Around The Right Side Of The Blogosphere&lt;/strong&gt;

There didn&#039;t seem to be much excitement around the right side of the blogosphere about Bush&#039;s State of the Union...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reaction To The State Of The Union From Around The Right Side Of The Blogosphere</strong></p>
<p>There didn&#8217;t seem to be much excitement around the right side of the blogosphere about Bush&#8217;s State of the Union&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom TB</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678786</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678786</guid>
		<description>On illegal immigration; I don&#039;t like rewarding people whose very first experience in our Nation was evading uniformed law enforcement officers, and if they are given some &quot;amnesty&quot;, two things will certainly happen; they will have learned nothing but cheerful disregard for our system of law; and the Legal immigrants who waited years to play by the rules will have nothing but contempt for the illegals!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On illegal immigration; I don&#8217;t like rewarding people whose very first experience in our Nation was evading uniformed law enforcement officers, and if they are given some &#8220;amnesty&#8221;, two things will certainly happen; they will have learned nothing but cheerful disregard for our system of law; and the Legal immigrants who waited years to play by the rules will have nothing but contempt for the illegals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678744</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678744</guid>
		<description>This is too funny. A Congresswoman can&#039;t keep her hands off Bush.

At least some in Congress love Bush...[laughs]

&lt;blockquote&gt;
MN congresswoman can&#039;t keep her hand off Bush 
Newly-elected Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann got quite a bit of face time with President Bush after his State of the Union Speech Tuesday night. 

While the President was signing autographs for members of Congress after the speech, the sixth-district Republican put her hand on Bush&#039;s shoulder. However, it wasn&#039;t just a tap. After he signed an autograph for her, Bachmann grabbed the president and did not let go for almost 30 seconds. 

After signing the autograph for Bachmann, the president turns away, but Bachmann doesn&#039;t let go. In fact, the video shows her reaching out to get a better grip on him. 

Bush then leans over to kiss another congresswoman, but Bachmann is still holding on. Bachmann then gets more attention, a kiss and an embrace from the president. A few seconds later, Bachman&#039;s hand finally comes off the presidential shoulder. 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S26304.shtml?cat=89&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;

Click the link and watch the video also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is too funny. A Congresswoman can&#8217;t keep her hands off Bush.</p>
<p>At least some in Congress love Bush&#8230;[laughs]</p>
<blockquote><p>
MN congresswoman can&#8217;t keep her hand off Bush<br />
Newly-elected Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann got quite a bit of face time with President Bush after his State of the Union Speech Tuesday night. </p>
<p>While the President was signing autographs for members of Congress after the speech, the sixth-district Republican put her hand on Bush&#8217;s shoulder. However, it wasn&#8217;t just a tap. After he signed an autograph for her, Bachmann grabbed the president and did not let go for almost 30 seconds. </p>
<p>After signing the autograph for Bachmann, the president turns away, but Bachmann doesn&#8217;t let go. In fact, the video shows her reaching out to get a better grip on him. </p>
<p>Bush then leans over to kiss another congresswoman, but Bachmann is still holding on. Bachmann then gets more attention, a kiss and an embrace from the president. A few seconds later, Bachman&#8217;s hand finally comes off the presidential shoulder. </p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S26304.shtml?cat=89" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>
<p>Click the link and watch the video also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senator Webb: how we see the health of our economy â€“ how we measure it, and how we ensure that its benefits are properly shared among all Americans.</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678681</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senator Webb: how we see the health of our economy â€“ how we measure it, and how we ensure that its benefits are properly shared among all Americans.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678681</guid>
		<description>[...] Sister Toldjah Â» Comment thread: The President&#039;s State of the Union address and the Dem response to it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sister Toldjah Â» Comment thread: The President&#8217;s State of the Union address and the Dem response to it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Thoughts On Bush&#8217;s State Of The Union Speech at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678580</link>
		<dc:creator>My Thoughts On Bush&#8217;s State Of The Union Speech at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678580</guid>
		<description>[...] Right Wing News Hot Air Captain&#8217;s Quarters Sister Toldjah Michelle Malkin Stop The ACLU Ed Driscoll Dean Barnett Instapundit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right Wing News Hot Air Captain&#8217;s Quarters Sister Toldjah Michelle Malkin Stop The ACLU Ed Driscoll Dean Barnett Instapundit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678568</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678568</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;My Thoughts On Bush&#8217;s State Of The Union Speech&lt;/strong&gt;

I did watch it, for the most part, especially the beginning, and I walked away from it with one thought, and one thought alone: no matter what this man does, the Democrats are hell-bent on his dest&#8230;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>My Thoughts On Bush&#8217;s State Of The Union Speech</strong></p>
<p>I did watch it, for the most part, especially the beginning, and I walked away from it with one thought, and one thought alone: no matter what this man does, the Democrats are hell-bent on his dest&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedintheShed</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678377</link>
		<dc:creator>TedintheShed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678377</guid>
		<description>Not bd, over all.

Some specifics:

I liked the increase of the armed forces by 92,000 over the next five years. I dislike that it is only 92,000. However, Clinton really hurt us as a military power when he cut troops and support by 800,000. That kind of cut takes a generation to recover from.

I didn&#039;t like how soft he remained on the birder issue.

I like how he was talking about not incresing taxes, and being fiscally conservative (something I haven&#039;t seen from him till this point).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bd, over all.</p>
<p>Some specifics:</p>
<p>I liked the increase of the armed forces by 92,000 over the next five years. I dislike that it is only 92,000. However, Clinton really hurt us as a military power when he cut troops and support by 800,000. That kind of cut takes a generation to recover from.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t like how soft he remained on the birder issue.</p>
<p>I like how he was talking about not incresing taxes, and being fiscally conservative (something I haven&#8217;t seen from him till this point).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Moderate Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bush&#8217;s Pleads For More Time On Iraq In Less Partisan Speech</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678330</link>
		<dc:creator>The Moderate Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bush&#8217;s Pleads For More Time On Iraq In Less Partisan Speech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 05:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678330</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211;Ezra Klein:&#8221;He&#8217;s weak, and you sense he knows it. The speech hit the notes it needed to and no more. It was, this time, a formality, a book report bound and delivered to Congress, just as the assignment called for. He sought checkmarks for attendance and completion, and went home.&#8221; &#8211;The Jawa Report:&#8221;One of Bush&#8217;s better speeches. Which means the content was good, the delivery a bit lacking as usual&#8230;So do you think Nancy and Dick will become best friends after sharing that pack butterrum of Lifesavers during the speech? Hey, anything is possible.&#8221; &#8211;Powerline&#8217;s John Hinderaker:&#8221;I thought President Bush was back on his game tonight. The speech was a reminder that it&#8217;s a good thing to be President. When he offered a sentence about Iraq that ended with the word &#8220;victory,&#8221; the Democrats had no alternative but to stand up and cheer. Apart from the ceremonial trappings, there was a good reason why so many Senators and Congressmen had to voice their approval: the President&#8217;s logic was compelling. The importance of Iraq; the disastrous consequences of failure; the grave long-term stakes in the Global War on Terror; and the need to give our new strategy a chance to succeed, are all hard to dissent from.&#8221; &#8211;An interesting summary from No More Mister Nice Blog.. &#8211;Flashpoint:&#8221;I &#039;ll give Bush a C+ for his State of the Union speech tonight, which is a fairly high mark for him these days. I consider the bulk of the domestic agenda he laid out to be pure rubbish. Fortunately very few of Bush&#039;s SOTU proposals ever see the light of day.&#8221; &#8211;Sister Toldjah:&#8221;Anyone else notice how the Dems didn&#039;t stand up en masse and applaud when the President talked about the pursuit of victory and security in the WOT? Telling, but not exactly â€˜revealing&#039; to most of us.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211;Ezra Klein:&#8221;He&#8217;s weak, and you sense he knows it. The speech hit the notes it needed to and no more. It was, this time, a formality, a book report bound and delivered to Congress, just as the assignment called for. He sought checkmarks for attendance and completion, and went home.&#8221; &#8211;The Jawa Report:&#8221;One of Bush&#8217;s better speeches. Which means the content was good, the delivery a bit lacking as usual&#8230;So do you think Nancy and Dick will become best friends after sharing that pack butterrum of Lifesavers during the speech? Hey, anything is possible.&#8221; &#8211;Powerline&#8217;s John Hinderaker:&#8221;I thought President Bush was back on his game tonight. The speech was a reminder that it&#8217;s a good thing to be President. When he offered a sentence about Iraq that ended with the word &#8220;victory,&#8221; the Democrats had no alternative but to stand up and cheer. Apart from the ceremonial trappings, there was a good reason why so many Senators and Congressmen had to voice their approval: the President&#8217;s logic was compelling. The importance of Iraq; the disastrous consequences of failure; the grave long-term stakes in the Global War on Terror; and the need to give our new strategy a chance to succeed, are all hard to dissent from.&#8221; &#8211;An interesting summary from No More Mister Nice Blog.. &#8211;Flashpoint:&#8221;I &#8216;ll give Bush a C+ for his State of the Union speech tonight, which is a fairly high mark for him these days. I consider the bulk of the domestic agenda he laid out to be pure rubbish. Fortunately very few of Bush&#8217;s SOTU proposals ever see the light of day.&#8221; &#8211;Sister Toldjah:&#8221;Anyone else notice how the Dems didn&#8217;t stand up en masse and applaud when the President talked about the pursuit of victory and security in the WOT? Telling, but not exactly â€˜revealing&#8217; to most of us.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Art</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678269</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678269</guid>
		<description>I watched.  I would have preferred a bit more passion from Bush, but the message overall was good regarding the war in particular.  Perhaps he&#039;s just tired.  Don&#039;t blame him.

I caught the Web response shortly after it began, but couldn&#039;t watch it all.  I bailed after the usual inference that this is the first war that hasn&#039;t gone perfectly.  It disgusts me.

I particularly liked the end where he highlighted guests beginning with Dikembe Motumbo of the NBA.  When he spoke of these as examples of what Americans are like, his demeanor picked up noticeably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched.  I would have preferred a bit more passion from Bush, but the message overall was good regarding the war in particular.  Perhaps he&#8217;s just tired.  Don&#8217;t blame him.</p>
<p>I caught the Web response shortly after it began, but couldn&#8217;t watch it all.  I bailed after the usual inference that this is the first war that hasn&#8217;t gone perfectly.  It disgusts me.</p>
<p>I particularly liked the end where he highlighted guests beginning with Dikembe Motumbo of the NBA.  When he spoke of these as examples of what Americans are like, his demeanor picked up noticeably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Mind / Bush&#8217;s State of the Union 2007</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678260</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Mind / Bush&#8217;s State of the Union 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678260</guid>
		<description>[...] Bryan Preston talks about the Democrats&#8217; concerns for Darfur. I noticed Speaker Pelosi didn&#8217;t stand when Bush talked about the &#8220;cause of freedom&#8221; in Cuba, but jumped when Darfur was mentioned. [via Sister Toldjah]  Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bryan Preston talks about the Democrats&#8217; concerns for Darfur. I noticed Speaker Pelosi didn&#8217;t stand when Bush talked about the &#8220;cause of freedom&#8221; in Cuba, but jumped when Darfur was mentioned. [via Sister Toldjah]  Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Political Pit Bull</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678230</link>
		<dc:creator>The Political Pit Bull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678230</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;State of the Union: Not A Complete Disappointment&lt;/strong&gt;

My expectations about what the president would say about the war against jihadism and Iraq were low, so maybe that&#039;s why I found myself somewhat surprised. And since there&#039;s a good deal of disappointment out there in addition to my...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>State of the Union: Not A Complete Disappointment</strong></p>
<p>My expectations about what the president would say about the war against jihadism and Iraq were low, so maybe that&#8217;s why I found myself somewhat surprised. And since there&#8217;s a good deal of disappointment out there in addition to my&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geezer</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678222</link>
		<dc:creator>geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678222</guid>
		<description>1st SOTU since &#039;01 I&#039;m not watching live (will catch it later either on Fox News or C-Span, or maybe not at all.)  No matter, since I&#039;m sure Dubya did well, the Dems still hate him, the MSM will downplay the good/play up the bad and we&#039;ll all drift a little further towards &#039;08.

In the meantime, what a Super Bowl we&#039;ll have!  Bears over the Colts by 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st SOTU since &#8216;01 I&#8217;m not watching live (will catch it later either on Fox News or C-Span, or maybe not at all.)  No matter, since I&#8217;m sure Dubya did well, the Dems still hate him, the MSM will downplay the good/play up the bad and we&#8217;ll all drift a little further towards &#8216;08.</p>
<p>In the meantime, what a Super Bowl we&#8217;ll have!  Bears over the Colts by 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/comment-page-1/#comment-678204</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/23/comment-thread-the-presidents-state-of-the-union-address-and-the-dem-response-to-it/#comment-678204</guid>
		<description>Yes Sanity. I don&#039;t know when it started but it&#039;s been happening as long as I rememember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Sanity. I don&#8217;t know when it started but it&#8217;s been happening as long as I rememember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
