<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senator Chuck Schumer on the &#8220;Today&#8221; show &#8211; priceless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/senator-chuck-schumer-on-the-today-show-priceless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/senator-chuck-schumer-on-the-today-show-priceless/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense Political Thought &#187; Archives &#187; The Democrats&#8217; dirty little secret</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/senator-chuck-schumer-on-the-today-show-priceless/comment-page-1/#comment-682038</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense Political Thought &#187; Archives &#187; The Democrats&#8217; dirty little secret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 02:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/senator-chuck-schumer-on-the-today-show-priceless/#comment-682038</guid>
		<description>[...] Sister Toldjah has a short article on the loquacious Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), and his appearance on the Today show:  Mark Finkelstein at Newsbusters has a partial transcript of yesterday&#039;s &quot;Today&quot; show where David Gregory interviewed Senator Chuck Schumer. It&#039;s very revealing, as you&#039;ll soon see (emphasis added): Gregory: &quot;The Vice-President is dismissive of this [resolution] effort yesterday saying it&#039;s not going to stop the president, and in fact he goes further, saying this will be detrimental to the troops on the ground.&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sister Toldjah has a short article on the loquacious Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), and his appearance on the Today show:  Mark Finkelstein at Newsbusters has a partial transcript of yesterday&#8217;s &#8220;Today&#8221; show where David Gregory interviewed Senator Chuck Schumer. It&#8217;s very revealing, as you&#8217;ll soon see (emphasis added): Gregory: &#8220;The Vice-President is dismissive of this [resolution] effort yesterday saying it&#8217;s not going to stop the president, and in fact he goes further, saying this will be detrimental to the troops on the ground.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/senator-chuck-schumer-on-the-today-show-priceless/comment-page-1/#comment-681930</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/senator-chuck-schumer-on-the-today-show-priceless/#comment-681930</guid>
		<description>The non-binding resolution is simple: it&#039;s a way for the Democrats (and not a few Republicans) to have a Recorded Vote that expresses some disagreement with the President concerning the conduct of the war, but without actually &lt;i&gt;doing&lt;/i&gt; anything about it.

The Democrats won the last elections, no doubt about it, and they won it based on the electorate&#039;s displeasure with the conduct of the war. That being the case, why don&#039;t the Democrats have the &lt;i&gt;cojones&lt;/i&gt; to end the war?  All that they have to do is to refuse to fund it any more.  While President Bush could veto any fund cut-off for the current fiscal year, the Democrats could simply refuse to pass an appropriation for any funds for any troops in Iraq for FY2008 -- which would mean that President Bush would &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; to withdraw every last one of them by September 30, 2007.

The dirty little secret is that the Democrats want the war to continue, at least until election day, 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The non-binding resolution is simple: it&#8217;s a way for the Democrats (and not a few Republicans) to have a Recorded Vote that expresses some disagreement with the President concerning the conduct of the war, but without actually <i>doing</i> anything about it.</p>
<p>The Democrats won the last elections, no doubt about it, and they won it based on the electorate&#8217;s displeasure with the conduct of the war. That being the case, why don&#8217;t the Democrats have the <i>cojones</i> to end the war?  All that they have to do is to refuse to fund it any more.  While President Bush could veto any fund cut-off for the current fiscal year, the Democrats could simply refuse to pass an appropriation for any funds for any troops in Iraq for FY2008 &#8212; which would mean that President Bush would <i>have</i> to withdraw every last one of them by September 30, 2007.</p>
<p>The dirty little secret is that the Democrats want the war to continue, at least until election day, 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/senator-chuck-schumer-on-the-today-show-priceless/comment-page-1/#comment-681209</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/senator-chuck-schumer-on-the-today-show-priceless/#comment-681209</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Lorica, I moved this to &lt;a href=&quot;http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/friday-open-thread-15/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;today&#039;s open thread&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  :) --ST&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Lorica, I moved this to <a href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/01/26/friday-open-thread-15/" rel="nofollow"><strong>today&#8217;s open thread</strong></a>.  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_smiley.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;' /> &#8211;ST</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
