
| Times Online | 0 | |
| Fox Boston | 0 | |
| Merc. News | 0 | |
| Big Govt | Obama’s Shock Troops: SEIU and Political Intimidation in St. Louis |
0 |
| NYT | 0 |
We know it’s not being in favor of victory in Iraq, so what could it possibly be? Mary Katharine Ham explains.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
© 2003 - 2009 Sister Toldjah • All Rights Reserved
Powered by: WordPress • Design by: E.Webscapes • Hosted by: Hosting Matters
Hey, damnit! We’re the ones who’re supposed to be shreddin’ the Constitution!!! The bastards!
but but but Its a Living Document……
Perhaps we can get some votes in the House for Mexico and France. After that we’ll ask Iran if they’re interested.
What a jolly good idea.
If you’re a ninny!
A tempest in a teapot, and a feel-good measure. If the delegates’ votes in a Committee of the Whole are the margin of victory (or defeat) of a measure, it gets revoted upon by the House, without the “bonus” votes. In other words, they’re there for show; they get to vote, but their votes aren’t important, and they don’t really count.
This situation existed the last time the Democrats controlled the House, and the Republic didn’t end.
I didn’t assert the “Republic was going to end”, Dana – here’s what bothers me:
This is about Dem expansion of power. Pelosi saying we need to expand democracy, that is just an idiot”ic” statement. Have we heard Nancy say 1 good thing about Iraq?? I have not heard it if she has. I just now looked and couldn’t find a single good thing. So obviously she isn’t concerned about democracy. She is concerned about her keeping her power. – Lorica